PFD report

Kimberley Sampson and Samantha Mulcahy · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Sep 2023•Central and South East Kent

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to include Herpes Simplex as a diagnosis to consider in sepsis pathways
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis
  2. Unclear advice on testing staff during infection investigations
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigations
  3. Lack of guidance on antiviral therapy for postpartum women with signs of systemic infection
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Update the combined maternal sepsis guideline to include timely identification and treatment guidance for herpes simplex, scheduled for publication in March 2024.

    Stated by Royal College of Obstetricians and GynaecologistsStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 22 September 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Responsibility for relevant national sepsis guidance lies with the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

    Stated by NHS EnglandRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to include Herpes Simplex as a diagnosis to consider in sepsis pathways

Wider context from the report

“(2) Evidence given at the inquest revealed that Herpes Simplex can be fatal if contracted in pregnancy and whilst deaths are rare there is no specific guidance in relation to treating women in the post-partum period with anti-viral therapy. It was accepted by all who gave evidence that antiviral medication would have been recognised treatment for Herpes Simplex (specifically Acyclovir). The Trust has made some minor amendments to its protocols but there is no national guidance either in place back in 2018 or currently in 2023 on prescribing antiviral medication to women who present with signs of systemic infection. Had Acyclovir been prescribed at an earlier stage it is likely to have significantly reduced the risk of death from progression of the disease. Sepsis protocols cover antibiotic therapy but not antiviral therapy. What was abundantly clear from the evidence before the court was that this is a rare but often fatal disease if contracted in the peripartum period and more needs to be done to raise awareness of it as a potential diagnosis to exclude in sepsis pathways and for early consideration of the use to Acyclovir. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unclear advice on testing staff during infection investigations

Wider context from the report

“(1) The inquest heard evidence of steps having been taken to try to establish if the deaths of both women were linked and if there was a common source of infection. In both inquests the women had been treated in separate hospitals but within the same Trust and two members of staff had been involved in treating both women. The inquest heard that Public Health England were involved in the investigation following the deaths and advice on testing staff was unclear which meant neither of the members of staff involved with both women were tested. The inquest was however unable to establish if the strain of the virus was the same in both women as the evidence on this was inconsistent and on balance the evidence did not support a conclusion that both women were infected by the same source. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of guidance on antiviral therapy for postpartum women with signs of systemic infection

Wider context from the report

“(2) Evidence given at the inquest revealed that Herpes Simplex can be fatal if contracted in pregnancy and whilst deaths are rare there is no specific guidance in relation to treating women in the post-partum period with anti-viral therapy. It was accepted by all who gave evidence that antiviral medication would have been recognised treatment for Herpes Simplex (specifically Acyclovir). The Trust has made some minor amendments to its protocols but there is no national guidance either in place back in 2018 or currently in 2023 on prescribing antiviral medication to women who present with signs of systemic infection. Had Acyclovir been prescribed at an earlier stage it is likely to have significantly reduced the risk of death from progression of the disease. Sepsis protocols cover antibiotic therapy but not antiviral therapy. What was abundantly clear from the evidence before the court was that this is a rare but often fatal disease if contracted in the peripartum period and more needs to be done to raise awareness of it as a potential diagnosis to exclude in sepsis pathways and for early consideration of the use to Acyclovir. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the combined maternal sepsis guideline to include timely identification and treatment guidance for herpes simplex, scheduled for publication in March 2024.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The College is currently in the process of updating its Green-top Guidelines on Sepsis in pregnancy (No. 64a) and Bacterial sepsis following pregnancy (No. 64b). The new name of the combined guideline will be Identification and management of maternal sepsis during and following pregnancy (No. 64). We will ensure that this updated version will contain guidance on the timely identification and treatment of herpes simplex. This is currently scheduled for publication in March 2024.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
Page 2 · response
Published 22 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for relevant national sepsis guidance lies with the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The relevant national guidance does not come under the remit of NHS England. The Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists (RCOG), who you also addressed your Report to, are one of the organisations responsible for the national guidance on diagnosing and treating sepsis during pregnancy and we note their response to you that they are in the process of updating their Green-top Guidelines on Sepsis in pregnancy (No. 64a) and Bacterial sepsis following pregnancy (No. 64b). The update will result in a new combined guideline titled Identification and management of maternal sepsis during and following pregnancy (No. 64), which will include guidance on the timely and routine identification and treatment of herpes simplex. NHS England notes that this is scheduled for publication in March 2024.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 22 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

National guidance on diagnosing and treating pregnancy-related sepsis and antiviral prescribing is outside the organisation’s remit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your second concern related to the delays in prescribing the antiviral medication Acyclovir to Kimberley and Samantha and that there was no national guidance in relation to prescribing antiviral medication in such cases, and that more needed to be done to raise awareness of the possibility of HSV to exclude in sepsis pathways.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 22 September 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Work collaboratively with stakeholders, including coroners, to improve the standard of care for women.

    Stated by Royal College of Obstetricians and GynaecologistsStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 September 2023.
  2. 2

    Discuss all Regulation 28 reports through the Working Group and share learning across national and regional NHS services.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 September 2023.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.3

  1. 1

    Investigating the source of the HSV-1 infections is outside the organisation’s appropriate remit.

    Stated by NHS EnglandOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.
  2. 2

    Identical HSV sequences do not establish a common source or transmission chain because of the virus’s evolutionary rate.

    Stated by NHS EnglandDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  3. 3

    Responsibility for investigating the HSV-1 infections lies with the Trust or UKHSA.

    Stated by NHS EnglandRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work collaboratively with stakeholders, including coroners, to improve the standard of care for women.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The RCOG is committed to improving the standard of care provided for women by working collaboratively with all stakeholders, including Coroners.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
Page 2 · response
Published 22 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss all Regulation 28 reports through the Working Group and share learning across national and regional NHS services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 22 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Investigating the source of the HSV-1 infections is outside the organisation’s appropriate remit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The first matter of concern in your Report was that the inquest was unable to establish if the strain of Herpes Simplex 1 infection suffered by both Kimberley and Samantha was of the same strain and came from the same source and that the evidence on whether this was the case was inconsistent.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 22 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Identical HSV sequences do not establish a common source or transmission chain because of the virus’s evolutionary rate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England has however engaged with UKHSA and the Trust following receipt of your Report. We have been sighted on a letter sent from PHE to the Trust on 12 September 2018, following phylogenetic analysis of the HSV samples that were provided to them following the deaths of Kimberley and Samantha. NHS England notes PHE’s findings that while the sequences within both samples are identical, due”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 22 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for investigating the HSV-1 infections lies with the Trust or UKHSA.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England are not the appropriate organisation to provide comment on any investigation into the source of Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) 1 infection contracted by Kimberley and Samantha. You may wish to refer this matter of concern to East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust (hereafter “the Trust”) or to the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), who assumed many of the public health and health protection responsibilities following the disbandment of Public Health England (PHE) in October 2021.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 22 September 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026