PFD report

Pauline May Pryor · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Jan 2018•Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to complete quarterly kidney function and lithium-level monitoring
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable medication-specific blood-level monitoringPart of recurring concern: Unreliable monitoring and follow-up of clinically required laboratory testsPart of recurring concern: Unsafe lithium treatment management
  2. Failure to review and act on specialist medication advice
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable doctor-to-doctor coordination of prescribing
  3. Failure of clinical alert processes to reflect applicable lithium monitoring guidelines
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical safety-alert systemsPart of recurring concern: Unsafe lithium treatment management
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Highlight lithium monitoring requirements to GPs and practices and remind them that current BNF and local CCG prescribing guidance is available.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 March 2018.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete quarterly kidney function and lithium-level monitoring

Wider context from the report

“• Mrs Pryor suffered from bipolar affective disorder and was on Lithium treatment which had been successful for many years in controlling her mood. Patients on Lithium are required to have quarterly blood tests to check kidney function and lithium levels. This was not carried out for a number of reasons do to with unclear communication between the Nursing Home and GP surgery. The practice did have in place a computer system to highlight test/reviews for certain groups of patients based on “Quality Outcome Framework Targets” (QOF) guidelines and were unaware these did not necessarily mirror the NICE Guidelines or Local Prescribing /Care Guidelines such as in the case of Lithium Toxicity • A blood test on 29th April 2015 showed Mrs Pryor’s kidney function dropped (eGFR 25) despite a lithium test being requested by Nursing Home and GP it did not occurred. As a result of the kidney function test result the GP wrote to Mrs Pryor’s Consultant Psychiatrist for advice on medication. The Psychiatrist replied by e-mail on the 15.6.15 and advised the GP to reduce and stop the Lithium medication. The E-mail was sent to the GP Practice e-mail but was not seen by the GP for reasons unknown nor was the reply chased up ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable medication-specific blood-level monitoring; Unreliable monitoring and follow-up of clinically required laboratory tests; Unsafe lithium treatment management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review and act on specialist medication advice

Wider context from the report

“• Mrs Pryor suffered from bipolar affective disorder and was on Lithium treatment which had been successful for many years in controlling her mood. Patients on Lithium are required to have quarterly blood tests to check kidney function and lithium levels. This was not carried out for a number of reasons do to with unclear communication between the Nursing Home and GP surgery. The practice did have in place a computer system to highlight test/reviews for certain groups of patients based on “Quality Outcome Framework Targets” (QOF) guidelines and were unaware these did not necessarily mirror the NICE Guidelines or Local Prescribing /Care Guidelines such as in the case of Lithium Toxicity • A blood test on 29th April 2015 showed Mrs Pryor’s kidney function dropped (eGFR 25) despite a lithium test being requested by Nursing Home and GP it did not occurred. As a result of the kidney function test result the GP wrote to Mrs Pryor’s Consultant Psychiatrist for advice on medication. The Psychiatrist replied by e-mail on the 15.6.15 and advised the GP to reduce and stop the Lithium medication. The E-mail was sent to the GP Practice e-mail but was not seen by the GP for reasons unknown nor was the reply chased up ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable doctor-to-doctor coordination of prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of clinical alert processes to reflect applicable lithium monitoring guidelines

Wider context from the report

“• Mrs Pryor suffered from bipolar affective disorder and was on Lithium treatment which had been successful for many years in controlling her mood. Patients on Lithium are required to have quarterly blood tests to check kidney function and lithium levels. This was not carried out for a number of reasons do to with unclear communication between the Nursing Home and GP surgery. The practice did have in place a computer system to highlight test/reviews for certain groups of patients based on “Quality Outcome Framework Targets” (QOF) guidelines and were unaware these did not necessarily mirror the NICE Guidelines or Local Prescribing /Care Guidelines such as in the case of Lithium Toxicity • A blood test on 29th April 2015 showed Mrs Pryor’s kidney function dropped (eGFR 25) despite a lithium test being requested by Nursing Home and GP it did not occurred. As a result of the kidney function test result the GP wrote to Mrs Pryor’s Consultant Psychiatrist for advice on medication. The Psychiatrist replied by e-mail on the 15.6.15 and advised the GP to reduce and stop the Lithium medication. The E-mail was sent to the GP Practice e-mail but was not seen by the GP for reasons unknown nor was the reply chased up ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical safety-alert systems; Unsafe lithium treatment management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Highlight lithium monitoring requirements to GPs and practices and remind them that current BNF and local CCG prescribing guidance is available.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Lithium monitoring. Thank you for pointing out that the QOF framework which is designed to reward GPs for quality, is not the mirror of lithium monitoring guidelines. We will ensure that this is highlighted to GPs and practices and a reminder that up to date guidance is available from the latest BNF, and also local CCG prescribing guidelines.”

Source location

2018-0008-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 1 · response
Published 7 March 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Raise the communication concern in the GP bulletin and provide information to the Local Medical Committee for distribution.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 March 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Raise the communication concern in the GP bulletin and provide information to the Local Medical Committee for distribution.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHSE will raise this concern in our GP bulletin and also provide information to the LMC for distribution.”

Source location

2018-0008-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 1 · response
Published 7 March 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026