PFD report

Khalif Mohammed · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Sep 2025•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Insufficient resources for timely allocation of police officers to priority cases
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable case allocation and resolution of allocation disputesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable police incident dispatch and response under service demand
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Provide £200 million nationally to kickstart recruitment of 13,000 additional neighbourhood-policing officers, PCSOs and special constables.

    Stated by Home OfficeStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 September 2025.
  2. Action

    Provide increased police funding for 2025–26 settlements, pay awards, employer contributions and officer maintenance.

    Stated by Home OfficeStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 September 2025.
  3. Action

    Set expectations for forces to reduce inefficiencies and maximise productivity through the Police Efficiency and Collaboration Programme.

    Stated by Home OfficeStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 September 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Local Police and Crime Commissioners, Mayors and Chief Constables are responsible for resourcing decisions according to local needs.

    Stated by Home OfficeRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient resources for timely allocation of police officers to priority cases

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard that West Midlands Police had insufficient resources to allocate police officers to deal with Khalif's case on 06/01/25 which was classed as a priority case with expected allocation of resources within an hour. As a result, there was a significant delay in officers being allocated to the case. Whilst it could not be shown that this affected the outcome for Khalif, there is a risk of future deaths if the available resources are not sufficient to deal with the large numbers of cases received each day and in my view, action should be taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable case allocation and resolution of allocation disputes; Unreliable police incident dispatch and response under service demand.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide £200 million nationally to kickstart recruitment of 13,000 additional neighbourhood-policing officers, PCSOs and special constables.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the funding announced at the settlement, we are providing £120 million of in-year funding to support forces in meeting the cost of the 2025-26 pay award. The settlement also includes funding to support the costs of the 2024-25 pay award, the increase in the employer national insurance contributions, funding for officer maintenance and an additional £200 million nationally to kickstart the first phase of recruiting 13,000 additional police officers, PCSOs and special constables into neighbourhood policing roles.”

Source location

Response from Home Office
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide increased police funding for 2025–26 settlements, pay awards, employer contributions and officer maintenance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Chancellor has announced a real terms increase in police spending power over the next three years. For this financial year, the 2025-26 final police funding settlement provides funding of up to £19.6 billion for the policing system in England and Wales. This is an overall increase of up to £1.2 billion when compared to the 2024-25 settlement. West Midlands Police will receive up to £846.9 million in funding in 2025-26, an increase of up to £56.5 million (7.2%) when compared to the 2024-25 police settlement.”

Source location

Response from Home Office
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Set expectations for forces to reduce inefficiencies and maximise productivity through the Police Efficiency and Collaboration Programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is the responsibility of locally elected Police and Crime Commissioners, Mayors and Chief Constables to take decisions around their resourcing according to local needs. However, the Government recognises the challenges faced by police chiefs in prioritising finite resources and is committed to ensure that police forces can effectively tackle a wide range of public safety issues. We have set out our expectation to forces to reduce inefficiencies and maximise productivity driven through a new Police Efficiency and Collaboration Programme. This will free up cashable savings and officer time to reinvest in frontline activities. The Government will continue to engage with forces to ensure that”

Source location

Response from Home Office
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Local Police and Crime Commissioners, Mayors and Chief Constables are responsible for resourcing decisions according to local needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is the responsibility of locally elected Police and Crime Commissioners, Mayors and Chief Constables to take decisions around their resourcing according to local needs. However, the Government recognises the challenges faced by police chiefs in prioritising finite resources and is committed to ensure that police forces can effectively tackle a wide range of public safety issues. We have set out our expectation to forces to reduce inefficiencies and maximise productivity driven through a new Police Efficiency and Collaboration Programme. This will free up cashable savings and officer time to reinvest in frontline activities. The Government will continue to engage with forces to ensure that”

Source location

Response from Home Office
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Continue engaging with police forces through ongoing policy and funding discussions to understand and address their challenges and pressures.

    Stated by Home OfficeStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 September 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue engaging with police forces through ongoing policy and funding discussions to understand and address their challenges and pressures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is the responsibility of locally elected Police and Crime Commissioners, Mayors and Chief Constables to take decisions around their resourcing according to local needs. However, the Government recognises the challenges faced by police chiefs in prioritising finite resources and is committed to ensure that police forces can effectively tackle a wide range of public safety issues. We have set out our expectation to forces to reduce inefficiencies and maximise productivity driven through a new Police Efficiency and Collaboration Programme. This will free up cashable savings and officer time to reinvest in frontline activities. The Government will continue to engage with forces to ensure that”

Source location

Response from Home Office
Page 1 · response
Published 16 September 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026