PFD report

Tracey Bannister · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 Nov 2014•Black Country

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to advise discharged patients to contact the treating department as well as their GP when pain or raised temperature continues for more than 24 hours
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Revise, approve, disseminate and implement the discharge leaflet with instructions to contact the treating department as well as a GP when symptoms persist.

    Stated by Walsall Healthcare NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 November 2014.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to advise discharged patients to contact the treating department as well as their GP when pain or raised temperature continues for more than 24 hours

Wider context from the report

“My concern is that patients should be advised not only to contact their GP but also the department where surgery had been performed if symptoms of pain, raised temperature continue for more than 24 hours. In this case medical evidence suggested that she attended Hospital twenty four hours earlier then the outcome may have been different. Therefore, you may consider that the information and advice given to patients on discharge may need to be altered to take into account the lessons learnt from this inquest. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise, approve, disseminate and implement the discharge leaflet with instructions to contact the treating department as well as a GP when symptoms persist.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Coroner’s concern is that patients should be advised not only to contact their GP but also the department where surgery had been performed if symptoms of pain, raised temperature continue for more than 24 hours. In this case medical evidence suggested that had she attended Hospital twenty four hours earlier then the outcome may have been different.”

Source location

2014-0506-Response-by-Walsall-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2014

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Share learning from the inquest and internal investigation with staff across the organisation.

    Stated by Walsall Healthcare NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 November 2014.
  2. 2

    Improve record keeping and patient observation practices following the Root Cause Analysis.

    Stated by Walsall Healthcare NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 November 2014.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning from the inquest and internal investigation with staff across the organisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would like to take the opportunity to assure you that as an organisation, we have formal processes for investigating serious incidents. We have taken this case seriously and have conducted a full review. To this end, a Root Cause Analysis was completed which included a review of the systems in place for maintaining safety at the time. The learning from both the inquest and the internal investigation will be shared with staff across the organisation.”

Source location

2014-0506-Response-by-Walsall-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 21 November 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve record keeping and patient observation practices following the Root Cause Analysis.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A Root Cause Analysis was undertaken following Ms Bannister’s death and action was taken with regard to record keeping and observation of patients. Additionally, a review of the discharge information leaflet was undertaken; however we fully acknowledge that the review did not adequately address the risks that have been identified during the inquest.”

Source location

2014-0506-Response-by-Walsall-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026