PFD report

Christopher Allan MURFET · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Nov 2020•Lincolnshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
0

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

No concerns are currently included for this report.

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    The circumstances did not warrant detention under the Mental Health Act because the patient engaged willingly with informal psychiatric assessment.

    Stated by United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The circumstances did not warrant detention under the Mental Health Act because the patient engaged willingly with informal psychiatric assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“████████Consultant and Clinical Lead for A&E has reviewed Mr Murfet’s two previous attendances at Pilgrim Hospital A&E Department on 28 November 2019 and 7 December 2019. On both of these occasions, Christopher was seen and referred to the appropriate psychiatric service from the A&E Department, and subsequently discharged by them. As such we had no reason to use the Mental Health Act to detain him as on both occasions he was willing to engage in the informal assessment process.”

Source location

2020-0273-Response-from-United-Lincolnshire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 5 January 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026