PFD report

Sidi Chax Bojang · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 Aug 2025•North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to obtain psychiatrist review before discharge
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely continuing mental health reviews and follow-upPart of recurring concern: Inadequate psychiatrist review of mental health admission and discharge decisionsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical review and authorisation of discharge decisions
  2. Discharge decisions falling to a senior psychiatric nurse
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate psychiatrist review of mental health admission and discharge decisionsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical review and authorisation of discharge decisionsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processes
  3. Failure to account for recent self-harm, suicidal behaviour or suicidal thoughts when presentation appears improved
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate mental health risk assessmentPart of recurring concern: Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to obtain psychiatrist review before discharge

Wider context from the report

“Where there is a significant change in presentation when assessed suggesting that the patient is now well, when either the same day, or a short time before presentation, acts of self harm, suicidal behaviour or thoughts were present. That a psychiatrist did not review the person presenting before discharge. The discharge of the person in these circumstances fell to a senior psychiatric nurse. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely continuing mental health reviews and follow-up; Inadequate psychiatrist review of mental health admission and discharge decisions; Unreliable clinical review and authorisation of discharge decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discharge decisions falling to a senior psychiatric nurse

Wider context from the report

“Where there is a significant change in presentation when assessed suggesting that the patient is now well, when either the same day, or a short time before presentation, acts of self harm, suicidal behaviour or thoughts were present. That a psychiatrist did not review the person presenting before discharge. The discharge of the person in these circumstances fell to a senior psychiatric nurse. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate psychiatrist review of mental health admission and discharge decisions; Unreliable clinical review and authorisation of discharge decisions; Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to account for recent self-harm, suicidal behaviour or suicidal thoughts when presentation appears improved

Wider context from the report

“Where there is a significant change in presentation when assessed suggesting that the patient is now well, when either the same day, or a short time before presentation, acts of self harm, suicidal behaviour or thoughts were present. That a psychiatrist did not review the person presenting before discharge. The discharge of the person in these circumstances fell to a senior psychiatric nurse. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate mental health risk assessment; Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Publish the Men’s Health Strategy, including actions addressing mental health and suicide among men.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 August 2025.
  2. 2

    Invest up to £3.6 million over three years in Suicide Prevention Support Pathfinders for middle-aged men in high-risk areas.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 August 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish the Men’s Health Strategy, including actions addressing mental health and suicide among men.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Furthermore, on 19 November, to coincide with International Men’s Health Day, we published the Men’s Health Strategy. The Strategy includes tangible actions to improve access to healthcare, provide the right support to enable men to make healthier choices, develop healthy living and working conditions, foster strong social, community and family networks and address societal norms. It also considers how to prevent and tackle the biggest health problems affecting men of all ages, which include mental health and suicide, respiratory illness, prostate cancer, and heart disease.”

Source location

Response from Department for Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 29 August 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Invest up to £3.6 million over three years in Suicide Prevention Support Pathfinders for middle-aged men in high-risk areas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You may also be interested to hear that we have announced the Suicide Prevention Support Pathfinders programme for middle-aged men. This program will invest up to £3.6 million over 3 years in areas of England where middle-aged men are at most risk taking their own lives and will tackle the barriers that they face in seeking support.”

Source location

Response from Department for Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 29 August 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026