PFD report

Oлеgs Sulaimovs · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Aug 2014•Staffordshire South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Lack of encouragement to wear reflective clothing
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure people wear reflective or high-visibility clothing
  2. Lack of information about the nature of the road for the migrant population
  3. Lack of speed restrictions in a highly populated area
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Provide reflective vests in staff accommodation and include their recommended nighttime use in employment terms, induction and 2015 recruitment processes.

    Stated by T.W. Busby & SonStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 August 2014.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of encouragement to wear reflective clothing

Wider context from the report

“2. The lack of supply/encouragement to wear reflective clothing. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure people wear reflective or high-visibility clothing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of information about the nature of the road for the migrant population

Wider context from the report

“1. The lack of information given to the migrant population temporally resident in the area with regard to the nature of the road. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of speed restrictions in a highly populated area

Wider context from the report

“4. The lack of speed restrictions in an apparently highly populated area. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of a footpath

Wider context from the report

“3. The absence of a footpath and suitable lighting. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide safe pedestrian routes alongside roads.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of suitable lighting

Wider context from the report

“3. The absence of a footpath and suitable lighting. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of supply of reflective clothing

Wider context from the report

“2. The lack of supply/encouragement to wear reflective clothing. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide reflective vests in staff accommodation and include their recommended nighttime use in employment terms, induction and 2015 recruitment processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“But we will make available the supply of reflective vests in their accommodation and part of our terms of employment and they will be recommended to wear them at night in walking on the A518 and include this in our induction, recruitment process going forward for 2015 as all our seasonal staff are departing now.”

Source location

2014-0375-Response-by-T.W.-Busby-Son
Page 1 · response
Published 14 August 2014

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Movement restrictions outside working hours cannot be enforced because they would conflict with employees’ rights to freedom of movement.

    Stated by T.W. Busby & SonUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Movement restrictions outside working hours cannot be enforced because they would conflict with employees’ rights to freedom of movement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As an employer it is our duty of care to our staff during working hours but as you can appreciate we cannot enforce restrictions on their movements during non-working hours or after a work shift this is against their rights of movement and freedom to live and enjoy their stay at our farm.”

Source location

2014-0375-Response-by-T.W.-Busby-Son
Page 1 · response
Published 14 August 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026