PFD report

Ronald VOLANTE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Jan 2016•Liverpool and the Wirral

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to use available medical history to advise ambulance services of cardiac problems
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable provision of safety-critical patient information to paramedics
  2. Failure to advise doctors or emergency services of changes in circumstances after the first call
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe emergency call handling
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Brief all trained community alarm call handlers on the revised procedures, record their understanding, and provide the updated procedure.

    Stated by Magenta LivingStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 January 2016.
  2. Action

    Require call handlers to update emergency services about changes in a client’s circumstances and maintain contact until key holders or emergency services arrive.

    Stated by Magenta LivingStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 January 2016.
  3. Action

    Require call handlers to share relevant medical details with emergency services at initial contact unless instructed otherwise.

    Stated by Magenta LivingStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 January 2016.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to use available medical history to advise ambulance services of cardiac problems

Wider context from the report

“(1) Magenta Living Support Link had access to Mr Volante’s medical history and there is no evidence that this was used to advise the ambulance service of his cardiac problems – is this covered in the induction training of call handlers? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable provision of safety-critical patient information to paramedics.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to advise doctors or emergency services of changes in circumstances after the first call

Wider context from the report

“(2) Magenta Living Support Link were aware that there had been a change in Mr Volante’s presentation by 18.46 as he did not respond to the news that an ambulance was on the way – is this covered in induction training of call handlers with regard to advising a doctor or emergency service of a change in circumstances after the first call? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe emergency call handling.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Brief all trained community alarm call handlers on the revised procedures, record their understanding, and provide the updated procedure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a result of this change of procedure, all Magenta Living community alarmed trained call handlers were briefed with effect from 28ᵗʰ January 2016 as to this change and provided with a copy of the updated procedure that now includes this additional stage. As part of this discussion, staff confirmed their understanding of the new procedure which is recorded in their training record. This change of procedure will also be addressed with any new staff as part of their normal induction programme.”

Source location

2016-0499-Response-by-Magenta-Living
Page 2 · response
Published 28 January 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require call handlers to update emergency services about changes in a client’s circumstances and maintain contact until key holders or emergency services arrive.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response to Coroner’s concerns”

Source location

2016-0499-Response-by-Magenta-Living
Page 2 · response
Published 28 January 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require call handlers to share relevant medical details with emergency services at initial contact unless instructed otherwise.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the concerns raised at the inquest and subsequently detailed in the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Further Deaths Notice we have revised how we will deal with calls to the Ambulance service. We have written to all of our community alarm customers, including those organisations with whom we have contracts to provide a similar service. We have confirmed that with immediate effect that there will be an addition to current procedures in”

Source location

2016-0499-Response-by-Magenta-Living
Page 1 · response
Published 28 January 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor staff implementation of procedural changes through spot audits, call-recording reviews, data checks, and performance improvement measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, in light of the Coroner’s concerns and appreciating that standards can always be improved, Magenta Living has incorporated a number of additions to the procedures manual as a result of the Coroner’s recommendations as set out above. Our standard practice, which has been followed in respect of these changes, is that any changes or amendments made to procedures are always quickly communicated to staff across the various shifts. This is carried out on a one-to-one basis and also at team level. For assurance purposes, Team Leaders and managers ensure staff implement any changes smoothly and effectively and measures are put in place to monitor this such as spot auditing, listening to call recordings, data checks. Any concerns are immediately brought to the attention of the member of staff and a performance improvement plan is established.”

Source location

2016-0499-Response-by-Magenta-Living
Page 3 · response
Published 28 January 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Address the revised procedures with new call-handling staff through the normal induction programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a result of this change of procedure, all Magenta Living community alarmed trained call handlers were briefed with effect from 28ᵗʰ January 2016 as to this change and provided with a copy of the updated procedure that now includes this additional stage. As part of this discussion, staff confirmed their understanding of the new procedure which is recorded in their training record. This change of procedure will also be addressed with any new staff as part of their normal induction programme.”

Source location

2016-0499-Response-by-Magenta-Living
Page 2 · response
Published 28 January 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026