Investigation and inquest
On 12 March 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Lee James STAMMERS. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 22nd August 2025. The medical cause of death was :
1a Acute Cardiac Event
1b Lung Infection, Myocardial Ischaemia, Pericardial Effusion
II Haemorrhage from punctured right and left ventricles from pericardiocentesis
The inquest concluded with a narrative conclusion as follows:-
Mr Lee Stammers died as a result of an acute cardiac event which developed due to the combined effects of infection, myocardial ischaemia, and pericardial effusion, and occurred on a background of recognised complications of pericardiocentesis during resuscitation efforts.
Circumstances of the death
Mr Lee Stammers, 47 year old, attended Doncaster Royal Infirmary at 12:06 hours on the 10th February 2025 with chest pain, shortness of breath and nausea. He was treated for infection, with intravenous fluids and antibiotics. At 19:15 hours, Lee suffered a cardiorespiratory arrest and despite prolonged resuscitation attempts he was pronounced deceased at 20:00 hours.
During Mr Stammers admission, there were missed opportunities for the myocardial ischemia to be identified prior to his collapse. Electrocardiography was incomplete, not reported, or repeated. Blood tests were not performed as requested. If these actions had occurred, his clinical management would have been different.
Although, it is not possible to determine if the cardiac arrest would have been avoided and/or the ultimate outcome would have been different, if his cardiac ischaemia had been identified earlier and managed sooner but it would have given Mr Stammers the best possible chance of survival.
Coroner’s concerns
(1) Poor documentation, Communication, and systems–
There were no clear communication, documentation, or systems in place, to identify if investigations had been performed as requested. For example, the medical records indicated blood had been obtained and collected by the laboratory and the result was awaited. When blood had not been obtained.
Inaccurate information in the medical records and poor communication, led to a failure of urgent tests being undertaken. A comparable situation occurred, in relation to confusion regarding the performance of the electrocardiogram.
Poor communication, documentation, and systems allowed tests/actions to be cancelled by student nurses, temporary staff and locum clinicians, who can also access the system and cancel tests without any rationale, accountability or identifying themselves in the records. These individuals were referred to as “unknown” at the inquest and have not been identified.
Finally, there was clear and consistent evidence of poor documentation throughout the medical records, from admission to the emergency department continuing through to the resuscitation attempts.