PFD report

Brandon-Robert William Collins-Hayward · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 Dec 2020•Dorset

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of national guidance for close monitoring of mothers and babies following discharge after birth
  2. Lack of national guidance for medical assessment of a baby when the mother is admitted to hospital with potential sepsis
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Produce parent and carer posters explaining symptoms, urgency and routes to medical help for unwell babies under three months.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 March 2021.
  2. Action

    Produce open-access paediatric sepsis podcasts for healthcare and social care professionals.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 March 2021.
  3. Action

    Update NICE guidance on neonatal infection to cover late neonatal infection through 28 days.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 March 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    The Royal College of General Practitioners considers other professional bodies better placed to comment on and develop the recommended guidance.

    Stated by Royal College of General PractitionersRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national guidance for close monitoring of mothers and babies following discharge after birth

Wider context from the report

“i. I am concerned that due to the lack of national guidance regarding close monitoring of mothers and babies following discharge after birth, and the fact that there is no national guidance for a medical assessment of a baby when the mother is admitted to hospital with potential sepsis, there could be a death in the future. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national guidance for medical assessment of a baby when the mother is admitted to hospital with potential sepsis

Wider context from the report

“i. I am concerned that due to the lack of national guidance regarding close monitoring of mothers and babies following discharge after birth, and the fact that there is no national guidance for a medical assessment of a baby when the mother is admitted to hospital with potential sepsis, there could be a death in the future. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Produce parent and carer posters explaining symptoms, urgency and routes to medical help for unwell babies under three months.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is also important that safety netting interventions are provided to all parents and carers following discharge from hospital care after birth. In 2020, the RCPCH produced a set of posters for families living in the UK about when and how to get medical help for their child. A specific poster was created for parents/carers of babies less than 3 months old⁸ with advice on what to do if their baby is unwell and the signs and symptoms to recognise when urgent medical help is required.”

Source location

2021-0088-Responses-Redacted
Page 10 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Produce open-access paediatric sepsis podcasts for healthcare and social care professionals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The physiology of infants and their response to sepsis is particularly difficult to identify and a different approach from adults is required. In 2020, the RCPCH supported a complete revision and update of ‘Spotting the Sick Child’⁵, an interactive tool to support all health professionals in the assessment and recognition of the seriously ill child. The RCPCH also produced free to access paediatric sepsis podcasts⁶ designed as educational resources for all health and social care professionals exploring what sepsis is, and the complexities of recognising it.”

Source location

2021-0088-Responses-Redacted
Page 9 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update NICE guidance on neonatal infection to cover late neonatal infection through 28 days.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NICE also has a guideline on neonatal infection: antibiotics for prevention and treatment (CG149). This guideline covers preventing infection within 72 hours of birth in healthy babies, treating pregnant women whose baby is at risk, and caring for babies who have a suspected or confirmed infection. This guideline is also currently in the process of being updated, and the guideline’s scope has been extended to cover late neonatal infection (>72 hours to 28 days).”

Source location

2021-0088-Responses-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support development of a consistent paediatric early warning system across hospital and community settings in England.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The RCPCH is currently supporting the NHS System-wide Paediatric Observations Tracking Programme⁷ (SPOT) led by NHS England, which aims to deliver a consistent PEWS across England in both hospital and community settings. It is hoped that community use of PEWS established by NHS SPOT would provide healthcare professionals with the ability to track observations over time,”

Source location

2021-0088-Responses-Redacted
Page 9 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise and update the Spotting the Sick Child clinical decision-support tool.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The physiology of infants and their response to sepsis is particularly difficult to identify and a different approach from adults is required. In 2020, the RCPCH supported a complete revision and update of ‘Spotting the Sick Child’⁵, an interactive tool to support all health professionals in the assessment and recognition of the seriously ill child. The RCPCH also produced free to access paediatric sepsis podcasts⁶ designed as educational resources for all health and social care professionals exploring what sepsis is, and the complexities of recognising it.”

Source location

2021-0088-Responses-Redacted
Page 9 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update NICE guidance on postnatal care through eight weeks after birth.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NICE has published a clinical guideline on postnatal care up to 8 weeks after birth (CG37). This guideline covers the routine postnatal care that women and their babies should receive for 6–8 weeks after the birth. It includes advice given on breastfeeding, and the management of common and serious health problems in women and their babies after the birth. This guideline is currently in the process of being updated.”

Source location

2021-0088-Responses-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update postnatal care guidance to recommend assessing babies when mothers have confirmed or suspected puerperal sepsis.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The concerns raised in your report surrounding the circumstances of Brandon-Robert’s death were, whether there is sufficient guidance relating to the monitoring of mothers and babies in the immediate time following discharge from hospital after birth, and the assessment of babies when the mother is admitted to hospital within 28 days of birth (especially when diagnosed with infection and at high risk of developing sepsis).”

Source location

Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Page 1 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Royal College of General Practitioners considers other professional bodies better placed to comment on and develop the recommended guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The report's recommendations for better national guidance regarding the monitoring of mothers and babies following discharge after birth, and that babies are medically assessed when a mother is admitted to hospital, seem sensible but the Royal College of Midwives, the Institute of Health Visitors and the Royal Colleges of Emergency medicine and of Physicians may be in a better position to comment on these. General practitioners (GPs) usually undertake the postnatal check for mothers and babies slightly later at 6-8 weeks. Of course, patients can contact their GP earlier if they have any concerns but in terms of routine checks, earlier checks than 6-8 weeks tend to be undertaken by midwives and health visitors.”

Source location

2021-0088-Responses-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS bodies and clinical departments are responsible for ensuring operational compliance with national guidance and monitoring practice and outcomes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS bodies and individual clinical departments are also expected to ensure that their operational activities comply with NICE and RCOG guidelines. We would emphasise that there should be in place in all NHS organisations clear systems and processes for clinical governance that monitor and audit practice and outcomes. These arrangements should also ensure that clinicians of all professions practise under the latest national guidance.”

Source location

2021-0088-Responses-Redacted
Page 9 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

National learning and guidance changes should be pursued through NICE and relevant professional colleges rather than the Institute of Health Visiting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However what you ask for is national learning from this sad case. NICE produce national guidance used by all the relevant professions. ‘Normal Postnatal Care’ covers the postnatal period for mother and baby up until 8 weeks post partum. We note that you have already written to NICE. Whilst there is a time lag with their process this would seem the most efficient way of ultimately getting the messaging out to all the relevant professionals who will base their own guidance on that produced by NICE. There is also national guidance produced by Public Health England on identifying sepsis in babies which health visitors will use to inform their practice – you can find details here if you haven’t already been alerted to it: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/648381/Sepsis_guidance_for_health_professionals_and_school_nurses.pdf”

Source location

2021-0088-Responses-Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for developing and implementing any new NHS guidance sits with NHS Improvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The RCM was saddened to read about the tragic death of baby Brandon. We note that the direction of the Section 28 to us was undertaken in good faith by ████████ Vice President RCOG, however the RCM is a membership organisation and trade union, we have no jurisdiction over the education, employment or registration of maternity staff. The remit for the development and implementation of any new NHS guidance would sit with NHS Improvement.”

Source location

2021-0088-Responses-Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Continue advocating for adequate resources in child health.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 March 2021.
  2. 2

    Provide open-access guidance supporting the wider workforce to identify acutely unwell children in the community.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 March 2021.
  3. 3

    Update neonatal infection guidance to cover late neonatal infection from more than 72 hours through 28 days.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 March 2021.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    The Royal College of Midwives has no jurisdiction over maternity staff education, employment or registration, limiting its ability to undertake the requested work.

    Stated by Royal College of MidwivesOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.
  2. 2

    The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health cannot comment on case-specific practice involving healthcare professions and specialties beyond paediatrics.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue advocating for adequate resources in child health.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The RCPCH has also raised concerns on the redeployment of health visitors during the COVID-19 pandemic⁹, and published a recent Insight article¹⁰ on the important role of health visitors in supporting families who have new babies in the community. We will continue to advocate for the provision of adequate resources in child health and support the wider workforce by providing open access guidance on identifying the acutely unwell child in the community.”

Source location

2021-0088-Responses-Redacted
Page 10 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide open-access guidance supporting the wider workforce to identify acutely unwell children in the community.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The RCPCH has also raised concerns on the redeployment of health visitors during the COVID-19 pandemic⁹, and published a recent Insight article¹⁰ on the important role of health visitors in supporting families who have new babies in the community. We will continue to advocate for the provision of adequate resources in child health and support the wider workforce by providing open access guidance on identifying the acutely unwell child in the community.”

Source location

2021-0088-Responses-Redacted
Page 10 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update neonatal infection guidance to cover late neonatal infection from more than 72 hours through 28 days.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The scope of our updated guidance for Neonatal infection: antibiotics for prevention and treatment (NG195) also covers late neonatal infection”

Source location

Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Page 1 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Royal College of Midwives has no jurisdiction over maternity staff education, employment or registration, limiting its ability to undertake the requested work.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The RCM was saddened to read about the tragic death of baby Brandon. We note that the direction of the Section 28 to us was undertaken in good faith by ████████ Vice President RCOG, however the RCM is a membership organisation and trade union, we have no jurisdiction over the education, employment or registration of maternity staff. The remit for the development and implementation of any new NHS guidance would sit with NHS Improvement.”

Source location

2021-0088-Responses-Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health cannot comment on case-specific practice involving healthcare professions and specialties beyond paediatrics.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Medical Royal Colleges are membership-based professional bodies, which set the standards for training of specialist doctors in some or all parts of the UK and contribute to the further development of professional medical practice. As such, the RCPCH is unable to comment on the specifics of the case relating to the practice of other healthcare professions and specialties beyond paediatrics.”

Source location

2021-0088-Responses-Redacted
Page 8 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026