PFD report

Allison Louise Bird · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Apr 2020•West Yorkshire (west)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to escalate monitoring of patients’ vital signs
  2. Failure to consistently seek clinical review following non-reassuring vital signs results
  3. Failure to provide adequate preoperative discussion and explanation before consent
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate informed-consent processes for medical treatment
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to escalate monitoring of patients’ vital signs

Wider context from the report

“2. There did not appear to be an escalation of monitoring of Allison’s vital signs by nursing staff in the 24 hour period commencing at 11.00am on 12th March 2018. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consistently seek clinical review following non-reassuring vital signs results

Wider context from the report

“3. Nursing staff did not appear to be consistently seeking clinical review following non reassuring vital signs results actually taken in the same 24 hour period referred to in 2 above. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide adequate preoperative discussion and explanation before consent

Wider context from the report

“1. There was no discussion/explanation provided to Allison before she underwent planned major thoracic surgery on the 5th March 2018, the explanation given was immediately before she was asked to provide her written consent in the theatre area minutes before surgery commenced, a situation which if repeated causes me concern for a patient being able to appropriately consider the risks associated with proposed surgery and determine if they are willing to consent. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate informed-consent processes for medical treatment.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.