PFD report

Colleen Alice FLETCHER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Jul 2022•Rutland and North Leicestershire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to treat raised glucose levels as an ambulance-service emergency before hyperglycaemic collapse
  2. Lack of standby rapid-acting insulin prescriptions for otherwise stable diabetic patients
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable diabetes care and management
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Embed Home First into the revised pathway to support administration of rapid-acting insulin within two hours of referral when clinically necessary.

    Stated by NHS Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Integrated Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 10 October 2022.
  2. Action

    Revise insulin authorisation forms, require their use, and include frailty-based dosing guidance and recorded authorisation for ad hoc rapid-acting insulin.

    Stated by NHS Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Integrated Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 10 October 2022.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to treat raised glucose levels as an ambulance-service emergency before hyperglycaemic collapse

Wider context from the report

“I understand that patients who have volatile glucose levels have the availability of pre-issued prescriptions for rapid acting insulin. Those patients, like Mrs Fletcher, whose glucose levels are relatively stable don’t have the availability of the same prescription. Should their glucose levels begin to rise they would have to be referred to a GP, reviewed by that GP, possibly asked to monitor further and/or a prescription issued and collected from the surgery/chemist, before increased insulin could be administered. I was told that this could take in excess of a 24 hour period, during which time a patient’s glucose levels could continue to rise. I was told that raised glucose levels in and of themselves would not be considered an emergency for the ambulance service until a patient went into a state of hyperglycaemic collapse, which, as in the case of Mrs Fletcher, was a point of no return. I understand that discussions are taking place to ensure the availability of fast acting insulin to be prescribed for all patients who are diabetic (regardless of volatility in their blood glucose levels) and that whilst progress has been made for those whose readings are volatile there is still work to be done to have the standby provision of bolus injections available for patients otherwise stable, whose glucose levels could at any point become unstable (by contracting an infection for example). I consider that this is an essential tool for nurses on the front line to have at their disposal in treating effectively rising glucose levels and preventing hyperglycaemia and subsequent death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of standby rapid-acting insulin prescriptions for otherwise stable diabetic patients

Wider context from the report

“I understand that patients who have volatile glucose levels have the availability of pre-issued prescriptions for rapid acting insulin. Those patients, like Mrs Fletcher, whose glucose levels are relatively stable don’t have the availability of the same prescription. Should their glucose levels begin to rise they would have to be referred to a GP, reviewed by that GP, possibly asked to monitor further and/or a prescription issued and collected from the surgery/chemist, before increased insulin could be administered. I was told that this could take in excess of a 24 hour period, during which time a patient’s glucose levels could continue to rise. I was told that raised glucose levels in and of themselves would not be considered an emergency for the ambulance service until a patient went into a state of hyperglycaemic collapse, which, as in the case of Mrs Fletcher, was a point of no return. I understand that discussions are taking place to ensure the availability of fast acting insulin to be prescribed for all patients who are diabetic (regardless of volatility in their blood glucose levels) and that whilst progress has been made for those whose readings are volatile there is still work to be done to have the standby provision of bolus injections available for patients otherwise stable, whose glucose levels could at any point become unstable (by contracting an infection for example). I consider that this is an essential tool for nurses on the front line to have at their disposal in treating effectively rising glucose levels and preventing hyperglycaemia and subsequent death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable diabetes care and management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Embed Home First into the revised pathway to support administration of rapid-acting insulin within two hours of referral when clinically necessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. Prioritising availability and administration of rapid acting insulin for the patient where it is deemed necessary by linking the pathway to our existing Home First service for a faster response. Home First is our expert rapid response team that are on hand within two hours to help keep older people well at home and avoid hospital admissions, this will ensure that diabetic care home residents who are experiencing an episode of unstable glucose will receive administration of insulin bolus within 2 hours of a referral. | 1st October 2022 | 15th October 2022 | Started and in progress. Home First have agreed to support and will be embedded into the revised pathway.”

Source location

Response from Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland
Page 2 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise insulin authorisation forms, require their use, and include frailty-based dosing guidance and recorded authorisation for ad hoc rapid-acting insulin.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. Review the existing insulin authorisation form and make it mandatory for primary care and hospital clinicians to use Insulin authorisation forms to quality assure safe prescribing of insulin including authorisation for bolus insulin in the community.”

Source location

Response from Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland
Page 2 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. 1

    Provide training and support to healthcare professionals and care-home staff on identifying and managing residents with raised blood glucose.

    Stated by NHS Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Integrated Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 10 October 2022.
  2. 2

    Review and improve the existing pathway and guidance for managing hyperglycaemia in care homes.

    Stated by NHS Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Integrated Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 10 October 2022.
  3. 3

    Support development of a system-wide business case seeking funding to expand continuous glucose-monitor use for care-home residents with diabetes.

    Stated by NHS Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Integrated Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 10 October 2022.
  4. 4

    Develop a communication plan to embed the revised pathway and clarify diabetic-care responsibilities across health and care settings.

    Stated by NHS Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 10 October 2022.
  5. 5

    Scope gaps in care-home diabetes support and guidance and seek service-development funding for a pilot project.

    Stated by NHS Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Integrated Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 10 October 2022.
  6. 6

    Update and circulate the amended pathway and guidance in an accessible flow chart for all relevant staff.

    Stated by NHS Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 10 October 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide training and support to healthcare professionals and care-home staff on identifying and managing residents with raised blood glucose.

Verbatim wording from the response

“b. appropriate training and support for health care professionals and care home staff so that they are able to identify and manage care home residents that are experiencing raised blood sugars. | 1st October 2022 - 15th October 2022 | August 2022; March 2023 | A series of training via roadshows currently in progress. Training for improving diabetic care in care homes had already been identified as a priority for 2022-23.”

Source location

Response from Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland
Page 2 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and improve the existing pathway and guidance for managing hyperglycaemia in care homes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The ICB has established a Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland wide task and finish group to review the existing clinical pathway for management of Hyperglycaemia in Care Homes. This task and finish group draws on clinical experts across the system specialising in diabetic care and includes:”

Source location

Response from Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland
Page 1 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support development of a system-wide business case seeking funding to expand continuous glucose-monitor use for care-home residents with diabetes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“6. Supporting the development of a system wide business case to access funding to expand the use of continuous glucose monitors devices for patients in a care home who are living with diabetes. This will assist the care home staff with monitoring and management of their resident’s glucose levels on a day-to-day basis. | June 2022 | October 2022 | Business case in development for submission for system review in October 2022”

Source location

Response from Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland
Page 2 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a communication plan to embed the revised pathway and clarify diabetic-care responsibilities across health and care settings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. To develop a communication plan to embed the revised pathway among health care professionals and care home staff. This will include providing,”

Source location

Response from Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland
Page 2 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Scope gaps in care-home diabetes support and guidance and seek service-development funding for a pilot project.

Verbatim wording from the response

“7. Further scope any gaps in support / guidance to care homes for the effective management of patients with diabetes and look to access service development funding for a pilot project | Aug 2022 | Nov 2022 | Started and in progress. Aim for all work relating to improving insulin management and support to care homes to be completed by Nov 2022”

Source location

Response from Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland
Page 2 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update and circulate the amended pathway and guidance in an accessible flow chart for all relevant staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. To update and circulate the amended pathway and associated guidance and ensure the patient pathway is available for all staff in an easy-to-follow flow chart. | 1st October 2022 | 15th October 2022 |”

Source location

Response from Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland
Page 2 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026