PFD report

Benjamin James Carroll · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Feb 2014•Gwent

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to close or control traffic on the road during the cycling sprint
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Remind riders, officials, and support staff before events about highway conditions, marshal limits, and oncoming traffic.

    Stated by Welsh CyclingStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 February 2014.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Accredited marshals cannot suspend standard highway conditions or enforce road closures anywhere on the course, including finishes.

    Stated by Welsh CyclingUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to close or control traffic on the road during the cycling sprint

Wider context from the report

“As the cyclists grouped together and sprinted towards the finish line, the road remained open to traffic despite the presence of accredited marshals with powers to stop/direct Traffic. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind riders, officials, and support staff before events about highway conditions, marshal limits, and oncoming traffic.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Prior to all British Cycling / Welsh Cycling events, all participants, including riders, officials, and support staff, are reminded of the conditions that the race is held under, including highlighting the risks associated with the event. All participants are reminded that events are held under standard highway conditions, that accredited marshals are only permitted to stop and hold traffic for short durations, typically at junctions, and that there will be oncoming traffic.”

Source location

2014-0068-Response-by-Welsh-Cycling
Page 1 · response
Published 20 February 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Accredited marshals cannot suspend standard highway conditions or enforce road closures anywhere on the course, including finishes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is important to note, therefore, that accredited marshals are not empowered to suspend standard highway conditions or enforce any kind of road closure, at any point on the course, including race finishes.”

Source location

2014-0068-Response-by-Welsh-Cycling
Page 1 · response
Published 20 February 2014

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Continue enhancing officials’ safety training and education through courses, online resources, conferences, and risk-management workshops.

    Stated by Welsh CyclingStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 20 February 2014.
  2. 2

    Implement a broader programme of participant training, education, and publicity on racing conditions, regulations, and responsibilities.

    Stated by Welsh CyclingStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 20 February 2014.
  3. 3

    Launch the ‘racesmart’ awareness campaign using online-entry communications, educational digital content, and managed social media messaging.

    Stated by Welsh CyclingStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 20 February 2014.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Welsh Cycling cannot unilaterally change cycle-sport rules without British Cycling and constituent-club agreement.

    Stated by Welsh CyclingUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue enhancing officials’ safety training and education through courses, online resources, conferences, and risk-management workshops.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Such measures, taken to ensure the safety of our competitors, are not limited to officiating on the day, but also involve continuous training and education of officials through a range of interventions which takes place throughout the year.”

Source location

2014-0068-Response-by-Welsh-Cycling
Page 1 · response
Published 20 February 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a broader programme of participant training, education, and publicity on racing conditions, regulations, and responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In light of the recent tragic death of Ben and given the desire of more people to get active through competitive cycle sport, we are in the process of implementing a further significant and more widespread programme of training, education and publicity to continue to ensure that all participants are aware of the conditions and regulations under which racing is held and responsible.”

Source location

2014-0068-Response-by-Welsh-Cycling
Page 2 · response
Published 20 February 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Launch the ‘racesmart’ awareness campaign using online-entry communications, educational digital content, and managed social media messaging.

Verbatim wording from the response

“More specifically we will be launching an awareness campaign called ‘racesmart’. The campaign will primarily target participants, but will also support event organisers and officials in their voluntary roles, to ensure the safe running of all events. Racemart will carry consistent core messages focussing on safety and responsibility. Targeted activity will range from direct communication to participants via British Cycling’s online entry system, through to the development of educational digital content and a managed social media campaign.”

Source location

2014-0068-Response-by-Welsh-Cycling
Page 2 · response
Published 20 February 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Welsh Cycling cannot unilaterally change cycle-sport rules without British Cycling and constituent-club agreement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Welsh Cycling is the national governing body for cycle sport in Wales and all cycling competition in Great Britain is regulated by British Cycling (The British Cycling Federation). It is important to note, therefore, that Welsh Cycling cannot unilaterally change the rules and regulations of the sport without the agreement of British Cycling and its constituent clubs.”

Source location

2014-0068-Response-by-Welsh-Cycling
Page 1 · response
Published 20 February 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026