PFD report

JOAN WILLIAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Jun 2020•Bedfordshire and Luton

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to require direct referral of Alzheimer’s dementia diagnoses to the DVLA/DVA
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable DVLA medical fitness notification arrangements
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Mandatory doctor notification of dementia diagnoses is not planned because current notification arrangements are considered effective and sufficient.

    Stated by Department for TransportExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to require direct referral of Alzheimer’s dementia diagnoses to the DVLA/DVA

Wider context from the report

“(3) Current legislation makes the driver legally responsible for telling the DVLA or DVA about Alzheimer’s dementia. Doctors are only required to alert patients to such a condition that can affect their ability to drive and to remind them of their duty to tell the appropriate agency. Doctors are only told that they should disclose this information directly to the DVA or DVLA without consent IF they are aware that the patient is continuing to drive and they consider it to be in the public interest to do so; (4) The Alzheimer’s Society reports that, in 2013, there were 815,827 people with dementia in the UK (including 1 in every 14 of the population aged 65 years and over) and that, if current trends continue, the number of people with dementia in the UK is forecast to increase to 1,142,677 by 2025 and 2,092,945 by 2051, which will be an increase of 40% over the next 12 years and of 156% over the next 38 years. (5) GPs are extremely busy professionals and may not always be made aware of a patient’s day to day activities. It was discussed at the Inquest that this tragedy, which involved not only the death of the deceased but also the death of her husband, might suggest that the public interest could be better served by the introduction of legislation to require ALL such diagnoses to be referred directly to the DVA/DVLA from the Memory Assessment Clinic and/or GP. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable DVLA medical fitness notification arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Mandatory doctor notification of dementia diagnoses is not planned because current notification arrangements are considered effective and sufficient.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There are no plans to place a legal obligation on doctors to notify a diagnosis of dementia. The current arrangements work well by respecting the rights of those diagnosed with dementia who retain insight, to be trusted to notify the DVLA. Where a doctor assesses that insight has been lost, a notification to the DVLA by the doctor is already allowed in the public interest.”

Source location

Department for Transport Response
Page 3 · response
Published 26 August 2020

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Keep road-safety policies under constant review.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 26 August 2020.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Keep road-safety policies under constant review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can assure you that we take road safety most seriously, and while our roads are some of the safest in the world we are not complacent and keep our policies under constant review.”

Source location

Department for Transport Response
Page 3 · response
Published 26 August 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026