PFD report

Shahbaz Salim Bhim and Shana Sutaria · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Sep 2017•Nottinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to effectively drain the collision scene
  2. Gap in the vehicle restraint barrier permitting unimpeded vehicle passage from the carriageway
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate roadside vehicle-restraint barriersPart of recurring concern: Inadequate vehicle restraint protection at hazardous edges
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Assess options for removing the field access and determine associated costs and a reasonable land-access value for an offer to the landowner.

    Stated by National HighwaysStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 3 October 2017.
  2. Action

    Progress the drainage scheme, including ditch clearance, pipe repairs or replacement, cleaning, and additional drainage installation.

    Stated by National HighwaysStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 October 2017.
  3. Action

    Continue discussions with the landowner and agent to secure removal of the field access and closure of the barrier gap.

    Stated by National HighwaysStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 October 2017.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Vehicle restraint barrier alterations cannot be implemented until agreement is reached with the landowner to close the field access.

    Stated by National HighwaysUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to effectively drain the collision scene

Wider context from the report

“c. The scene of the collision is in a natural ‘bowl’ and that, unless effectively drained, it is a point at which standing water will accumulate during and/or after heavy rainfall; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Gap in the vehicle restraint barrier permitting unimpeded vehicle passage from the carriageway

Wider context from the report

“d. The gap in the vehicle restraint barrier (Highways England’s location code X-465224,Y-328926) at the entrance to the land owned and/or occupied by ████████ (and registered at the Land Registry under title number TN514257) is a hazard to traffic in that it permits vehicles to pass unimpeded from the carriageway. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate roadside vehicle-restraint barriers; Inadequate vehicle restraint protection at hazardous edges.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess options for removing the field access and determine associated costs and a reasonable land-access value for an offer to the landowner.

Verbatim wording from the response

“████████ and his land agent understand the Coroner’s reasons for raising the entrance to the field as a matter of concern and are open to discussions on how the closure of the access can be achieved. Highways England will assess the options to remove the access to the field and close the corresponding gap in the centre reservation. Highways England Land Team will assist in assessing the relevant costs and allow us to place a reasonable monetary value on the land access so that we are able to offer this to ████████ in return for closing the existing access.”

Source location

Response from Highways England
Page 2 · response
Published 3 October 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Progress the drainage scheme, including ditch clearance, pipe repairs or replacement, cleaning, and additional drainage installation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“a. The drainage scheme is progressing as planned through the design and development phases with an estimated start date on the A46 in February 2018. The work will take place over a period of approximately 20 weeks with a planned completion date of June 2018.”

Source location

Response from Highways England
Page 2 · response
Published 3 October 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue discussions with the landowner and agent to secure removal of the field access and closure of the barrier gap.

Verbatim wording from the response

“b. Highways England are in discussions with ████████ his land agent ████████ Shouler & Son) regarding the removal of the access to the field which will allow us to install a continuous vehicle safety restraint barrier. Communication was made with ████████ during week commencing 25 September 2017 immediately following the inquest. As a result, discussions with ████████ began on the 4 October 2017 and continued on the 23 October 2017.”

Source location

Response from Highways England
Page 2 · response
Published 3 October 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Vehicle restraint barrier alterations cannot be implemented until agreement is reached with the landowner to close the field access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“████████ and his land agent understand the Coroner’s reasons for raising the entrance to the field as a matter of concern and are open to discussions on how the closure of the access can be achieved. Highways England will assess the options to remove the access to the field and close the corresponding gap in the centre reservation. Highways England Land Team will assist in assessing the relevant costs and allow us to place a reasonable monetary value on the land access so that we are able to offer this to ████████ in return for closing the existing access.”

Source location

Response from Highways England
Page 2 · response
Published 3 October 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026