PFD report

Mr. Steven John Welch · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Aug 2018•South Wales Central

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
6

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 6 recipients

Stated actions
14

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of employed interventional radiologists to provide tertiary support
  2. Lack of software enabling electronic transfer of radiology for external review and consultation
  3. Failure to provide rapid A&E review for head injury patients with reducing or fluctuating Glasgow Coma Scores
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to assess and respond promptly to significant signs of injury
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Schedule the transfer of radiology between health bodies into the current work programme.

    Stated by NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership Legal and Risk Services and the Welsh Risk Pool ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 October 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Health boards are responsible for ensuring identified changes and service changes, not the support service.

    Stated by NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership Legal and Risk Services and the Welsh Risk Pool ServiceRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of employed interventional radiologists to provide tertiary support

Wider context from the report

“At inquest, the errors in assessing the urgency of the need for medical assistance and the delay in providing that assistance were considered unlikely to have contributed to Steven Welch’s death. However, it was acknowledged that such errors could cause or contribute to the death of others where a subarachnoid haemorrhage had been sustained and for this reason, the Cwm Taf University Health Board is invited through this Regulation 28 to consider the following: i) Provision of rapid A&E review of a patient with a reported head injury and reducing or fluctuating Glasgow Coma Score even at times of public holidays; ii) Rapid transfer to a hospital or specialist centre providing neurosurgical diagnosis and treatment when such facilities are unavailable within the admitting hospital; iii) Failure by the Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board to have any interventionist radiologists in employment at the time thereby failing to provide tertiary support to the RGH and necessitating its patients to be sent out of area to England for treatment with inevitable delay; iv) Failure by the Cwm Taf Health Board and Vale University Local Health Board to have computer software in place to enable electronic transfer of radiology to hospitals and specialist centres out of Wales for review and consultation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of software enabling electronic transfer of radiology for external review and consultation

Wider context from the report

“At inquest, the errors in assessing the urgency of the need for medical assistance and the delay in providing that assistance were considered unlikely to have contributed to Steven Welch’s death. However, it was acknowledged that such errors could cause or contribute to the death of others where a subarachnoid haemorrhage had been sustained and for this reason, the Cwm Taf University Health Board is invited through this Regulation 28 to consider the following: i) Provision of rapid A&E review of a patient with a reported head injury and reducing or fluctuating Glasgow Coma Score even at times of public holidays; ii) Rapid transfer to a hospital or specialist centre providing neurosurgical diagnosis and treatment when such facilities are unavailable within the admitting hospital; iii) Failure by the Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board to have any interventionist radiologists in employment at the time thereby failing to provide tertiary support to the RGH and necessitating its patients to be sent out of area to England for treatment with inevitable delay; iv) Failure by the Cwm Taf Health Board and Vale University Local Health Board to have computer software in place to enable electronic transfer of radiology to hospitals and specialist centres out of Wales for review and consultation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide rapid A&E review for head injury patients with reducing or fluctuating Glasgow Coma Scores

Wider context from the report

“At inquest, the errors in assessing the urgency of the need for medical assistance and the delay in providing that assistance were considered unlikely to have contributed to Steven Welch’s death. However, it was acknowledged that such errors could cause or contribute to the death of others where a subarachnoid haemorrhage had been sustained and for this reason, the Cwm Taf University Health Board is invited through this Regulation 28 to consider the following: i) Provision of rapid A&E review of a patient with a reported head injury and reducing or fluctuating Glasgow Coma Score even at times of public holidays; ii) Rapid transfer to a hospital or specialist centre providing neurosurgical diagnosis and treatment when such facilities are unavailable within the admitting hospital; iii) Failure by the Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board to have any interventionist radiologists in employment at the time thereby failing to provide tertiary support to the RGH and necessitating its patients to be sent out of area to England for treatment with inevitable delay; iv) Failure by the Cwm Taf Health Board and Vale University Local Health Board to have computer software in place to enable electronic transfer of radiology to hospitals and specialist centres out of Wales for review and consultation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to assess and respond promptly to significant signs of injury.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in transferring patients to hospitals or specialist centres providing neurosurgical diagnosis and treatment

Wider context from the report

“At inquest, the errors in assessing the urgency of the need for medical assistance and the delay in providing that assistance were considered unlikely to have contributed to Steven Welch’s death. However, it was acknowledged that such errors could cause or contribute to the death of others where a subarachnoid haemorrhage had been sustained and for this reason, the Cwm Taf University Health Board is invited through this Regulation 28 to consider the following: i) Provision of rapid A&E review of a patient with a reported head injury and reducing or fluctuating Glasgow Coma Score even at times of public holidays; ii) Rapid transfer to a hospital or specialist centre providing neurosurgical diagnosis and treatment when such facilities are unavailable within the admitting hospital; iii) Failure by the Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board to have any interventionist radiologists in employment at the time thereby failing to provide tertiary support to the RGH and necessitating its patients to be sent out of area to England for treatment with inevitable delay; iv) Failure by the Cwm Taf Health Board and Vale University Local Health Board to have computer software in place to enable electronic transfer of radiology to hospitals and specialist centres out of Wales for review and consultation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Schedule the transfer of radiology between health bodies into the current work programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Staff spend lengthy periods undertaking reviews into issues which present as a trend in the claims reimbursement process, for example, review into the incidence and early identification of pressure sores. The Head of Safety and Learning of WRP is invited by health bodies to offer advice and assistance to clinical departments to improve patient outcomes; however we have no mandate to introduce any reforms or improvements ourselves. The issue of the transfer of radiology between health bodies both within Wales and across the border will be scheduled into the current work programme.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-NHS-Wales
Page 2 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Health boards are responsible for ensuring identified changes and service changes, not the support service.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During the course of the conduct of clinical negligence claims, including those where there has been or will be an inquest, it is common for us to recommend obtaining an independent expert opinion to identify those issues which may represent a standard of care which falls below that which is acceptable: on occasion, that expert identifies a real cause for concern which may affect patient safety. In those circumstances the content of the report is drawn to those senior clinical directors in the health body who are in a position to review the current provision of care and policies and who will be able to make urgent changes where necessary. We are not responsible for ensuring those changes are made nor do we seek to influence clinical decisions. That is not to say that I do not recognise the importance of”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-NHS-Wales
Page 1 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No mandate exists to introduce reforms or improvements directly.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Staff spend lengthy periods undertaking reviews into issues which present as a trend in the claims reimbursement process, for example, review into the incidence and early identification of pressure sores. The Head of Safety and Learning of WRP is invited by health bodies to offer advice and assistance to clinical departments to improve patient outcomes; however we have no mandate to introduce any reforms or improvements ourselves. The issue of the transfer of radiology between health bodies both within Wales and across the border will be scheduled into the current work programme.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-NHS-Wales
Page 2 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.13

  1. 1

    Continue collaborative work with Cwm Taf University Health Board to reduce ambulance conveyance, strengthen out-of-hospital pathways and improve patient flow.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 25 October 2018.
  2. 2

    Work with IAED to improve telephone breathing assessment using the Breathing Verification tool.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 25 October 2018.
  3. 3

    Recruit and train 90 additional staff, including staff allocated to Cwm Taf, to increase operational and reserve capacity.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 25 October 2018.
  4. 4

    Maintain structured training, competency sign-off, refresher training and ongoing performance monitoring for emergency medical dispatchers.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 October 2018.
  5. 5

    Continue monitoring MPDS performance and improving call-taker performance.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 25 October 2018.
  6. 6

    Develop and model an Optima Predict plan to strengthen emergency-demand and resource-capacity planning.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 25 October 2018.
  7. 7

    Review six months of call-taker errors to assess whether MPDS complexity contributes to operational errors.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 October 2018.
  8. 8

    Undertake reviews of trends identified through the claims reimbursement process, including pressure-sore incidence and early identification.

    Stated by NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership Legal and Risk Services and the Welsh Risk Pool ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 25 October 2018.
  9. 9

    Provide support and assistance to health bodies delivering training to improve risk management and clinical standards.

    Stated by NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership Legal and Risk Services and the Welsh Risk Pool ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 October 2018.
  10. 10

    Recommend independent expert opinions during clinical negligence claims to identify potential patient-safety concerns.

    Stated by NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership Legal and Risk Services and the Welsh Risk Pool ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 October 2018.
  11. 11

    Draw identified patient-safety concerns to senior clinical directors for review of care provision and policies.

    Stated by NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership Legal and Risk Services and the Welsh Risk Pool ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 October 2018.
  12. 12

    Review internal and independent reports to help clinical teams identify and reduce patient harm.

    Stated by NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership Legal and Risk Services and the Welsh Risk Pool ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 October 2018.
  13. 13

    Scrutinise health bodies’ evidence of lessons learned and require clear, auditable action plans before approving reimbursement.

    Stated by NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership Legal and Risk Services and the Welsh Risk Pool ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 October 2018.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.4

  1. 1

    Existing training, competency assessment, auditing and remedial-support systems are sufficient; the Trust does not propose changing its systems.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  2. 2

    The Health Board is responsible for sharing actions to continue minimising hospital handover delays, while the Trust undertakes supporting measures.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  3. 3

    The Trust does not believe MPDS is too complex for emergency medical dispatchers, based on its call-compliance review.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  4. 4

    Increasing staffing and reserve capacity remains constrained by the number of vehicles available and available budgets.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue collaborative work with Cwm Taf University Health Board to reduce ambulance conveyance, strengthen out-of-hospital pathways and improve patient flow.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst our colleagues at the Health Board will share with you the actions they are taking to continue to minimise handover delays, in response to the Regulation 28 report you issued separately to them, I would like to assure you that the Trust also continues to try and avoid conveyance of patients to the Emergency Departments when it is safe to do so. Whilst the following actions do not directly affect how long ambulance take to hand over the care of patients when they arrive at hospitals, these actions see a reduction in the number of patients being conveyed to Emergency Departments across Wales and improve the flow of patients within the NHS. Please find appended to this response further details of these supporting actions.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services
Page 5 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with IAED to improve telephone breathing assessment using the Breathing Verification tool.

Verbatim wording from the response

“With regard to the use of the breathing tool the Trust is and has been working with the International Academy of Emergency Dispatch (IAED) to try and improve the assessment of breathing over the phone. It is well recognised that this is very difficult to assess with callers and to aid EMDs the Breathing Verification tool has been developed. It is very clear in MPDS guidelines that if there is uncertainty about whether the patient is breathing they should act as if the patient is not breathing. If the patient is unconscious and is reported as breathing abnormally the caller is asked to check if they can feel or hear breathing. If the answer is “no”, then Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation is started. If the answer is “yes”, the breathing will be further evaluated using the Breathing Verification tool.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services
Page 2 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recruit and train 90 additional staff, including staff allocated to Cwm Taf, to increase operational and reserve capacity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has also undertaken the recruitment of 90 additional staff, who are undergoing training and will be operational by December 2018. Whilst the increase in staff is pan Wales, a proportion of the new staff will be operational in the Cwm Taf area. This will enable the Trust to increase the number of staff available to it and the number of staff that can be considered as being available “in reserve”, although we are obviously restricted by the number of vehicles available and available budgets.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services
Page 5 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain structured training, competency sign-off, refresher training and ongoing performance monitoring for emergency medical dispatchers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that the call handlers, known as Emergency Medical Dispatchers (EMDs), training schedule was last reviewed prior to the last induction of new recruits in July 2018. All trainees have to be signed off as competent before they are allowed to go live within the operational service. The auditors within the clinical contact centre act as mentors to the new EMDs and are experts in the level of competency required to take 999 calls.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services
Page 1 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring MPDS performance and improving call-taker performance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Having reviewed this evidence the Trust does not believe the EMDs find MPDS too complex to use. The Trust will continue to monitor the EMD’s performance using MPDS and continue to work to improve call takers performance.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services
Page 4 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and model an Optima Predict plan to strengthen emergency-demand and resource-capacity planning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is aware of the need to consider changes to the demographics in Wales, both current and predicted, and as such the Trust’s Planning & Performance Directorate, since July 2018, have been working on a project in relation to Optima Predict.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services
Page 4 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review six months of call-taker errors to assess whether MPDS complexity contributes to operational errors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to the Regulation 28 received from yourself we have undertaken a review of the calls taken for the first 6 months of the year to explore if there is any evidence to support the supposition that MPDS is too complex for call handlers to use effectively. Of the calls audited only 7% of calls were non-compliant. A total of 85% were of high compliance and in order to get a recorded result of high compliance the call taker has to have scored a perfect 100%.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services
Page 3 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake reviews of trends identified through the claims reimbursement process, including pressure-sore incidence and early identification.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Staff spend lengthy periods undertaking reviews into issues which present as a trend in the claims reimbursement process, for example, review into the incidence and early identification of pressure sores. The Head of Safety and Learning of WRP is invited by health bodies to offer advice and assistance to clinical departments to improve patient outcomes; however we have no mandate to introduce any reforms or improvements ourselves. The issue of the transfer of radiology between health bodies both within Wales and across the border will be scheduled into the current work programme.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-NHS-Wales
Page 2 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide support and assistance to health bodies delivering training to improve risk management and clinical standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Welsh Risk Pool Service has two primary functions: the first is to reimburse health bodies which have paid compensation and costs in respect of a clinical negligence or other personal injury claim made against it. In order for the advisory board of WRPS to approve reimbursement, a careful scrutiny of papers submitted to provide evidence of the lessons learned from the events leading to the claim is undertaken, notwithstanding that these events may have been some years before. Insufficient or unsubstantiated submissions are rejected and reimbursement deferred or even, in extreme cases refused, until clear, auditable action plans are produced. The second function is to provide support and assistance to health bodies in the provision of training to improve risk management and clinical standards.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-NHS-Wales
Page 2 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recommend independent expert opinions during clinical negligence claims to identify potential patient-safety concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During the course of the conduct of clinical negligence claims, including those where there has been or will be an inquest, it is common for us to recommend obtaining an independent expert opinion to identify those issues which may represent a standard of care which falls below that which is acceptable: on occasion, that expert identifies a real cause for concern which may affect patient safety. In those circumstances the content of the report is drawn to those senior clinical directors in the health body who are in a position to review the current provision of care and policies and who will be able to make urgent changes where necessary. We are not responsible for ensuring those changes are made nor do we seek to influence clinical decisions. That is not to say that I do not recognise the importance of”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-NHS-Wales
Page 1 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Draw identified patient-safety concerns to senior clinical directors for review of care provision and policies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During the course of the conduct of clinical negligence claims, including those where there has been or will be an inquest, it is common for us to recommend obtaining an independent expert opinion to identify those issues which may represent a standard of care which falls below that which is acceptable: on occasion, that expert identifies a real cause for concern which may affect patient safety. In those circumstances the content of the report is drawn to those senior clinical directors in the health body who are in a position to review the current provision of care and policies and who will be able to make urgent changes where necessary. We are not responsible for ensuring those changes are made nor do we seek to influence clinical decisions. That is not to say that I do not recognise the importance of”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-NHS-Wales
Page 1 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review internal and independent reports to help clinical teams identify and reduce patient harm.

Verbatim wording from the response

“the work that we do to support the clinical teams to reduce harm to patients by our careful review of the internal and the independent reports obtained into care complained of.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-NHS-Wales
Page 2 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Scrutinise health bodies’ evidence of lessons learned and require clear, auditable action plans before approving reimbursement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Welsh Risk Pool Service has two primary functions: the first is to reimburse health bodies which have paid compensation and costs in respect of a clinical negligence or other personal injury claim made against it. In order for the advisory board of WRPS to approve reimbursement, a careful scrutiny of papers submitted to provide evidence of the lessons learned from the events leading to the claim is undertaken, notwithstanding that these events may have been some years before. Insufficient or unsubstantiated submissions are rejected and reimbursement deferred or even, in extreme cases refused, until clear, auditable action plans are produced. The second function is to provide support and assistance to health bodies in the provision of training to improve risk management and clinical standards.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-NHS-Wales
Page 2 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing training, competency assessment, auditing and remedial-support systems are sufficient; the Trust does not propose changing its systems.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst the Trust does not propose to change its systems following the receipt of the Regulation 28 report, I hope this reassures you that the Trust does have in place systems for considering call takers initial training needs, as well as monitoring their ongoing performance, with built in occasions to identify and act on remedial training needs.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services
Page 2 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Health Board is responsible for sharing actions to continue minimising hospital handover delays, while the Trust undertakes supporting measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst our colleagues at the Health Board will share with you the actions they are taking to continue to minimise handover delays, in response to the Regulation 28 report you issued separately to them, I would like to assure you that the Trust also continues to try and avoid conveyance of patients to the Emergency Departments when it is safe to do so. Whilst the following actions do not directly affect how long ambulance take to hand over the care of patients when they arrive at hospitals, these actions see a reduction in the number of patients being conveyed to Emergency Departments across Wales and improve the flow of patients within the NHS. Please find appended to this response further details of these supporting actions.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services
Page 5 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust does not believe MPDS is too complex for emergency medical dispatchers, based on its call-compliance review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to the Regulation 28 received from yourself we have undertaken a review of the calls taken for the first 6 months of the year to explore if there is any evidence to support the supposition that MPDS is too complex for call handlers to use effectively. Of the calls audited only 7% of calls were non-compliant. A total of 85% were of high compliance and in order to get a recorded result of high compliance the call taker has to have scored a perfect 100%.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services
Page 3 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increasing staffing and reserve capacity remains constrained by the number of vehicles available and available budgets.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has also undertaken the recruitment of 90 additional staff, who are undergoing training and will be operational by December 2018. Whilst the increase in staff is pan Wales, a proportion of the new staff will be operational in the Cwm Taf area. This will enable the Trust to increase the number of staff available to it and the number of staff that can be considered as being available “in reserve”, although we are obviously restricted by the number of vehicles available and available budgets.”

Source location

2018-0267-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services
Page 5 · response
Published 25 October 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/6

Data last updated 7 September 2026