PFD report

Kenneth Smalley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Dec 2013•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Handset emergency stop buttons failing to operate independently when other handset parts are damaged
  2. Inadequate staff training and auditing of pre-operative equipment checks
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable pre-operative preparation and safety checks
  3. Pre-operation checks failing to assess handset function, condition, seals and position
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable pre-operative preparation and safety checks
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Hold the arranged discussion with the MHRA to strengthen future communication and information sharing.

    Stated by Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2013.
  2. Action

    Implement and disseminate a theatre-preparation procedure requiring operating-table checks before daily lists.

    Stated by Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2013.
  3. Action

    Implement a daily checklist for critical equipment across all theatres, with sign-off and monthly auditing.

    Stated by Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2013.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing maintenance contracts and theatre preparation checks are considered sufficient to identify damage to operating tables and handsets.

    Stated by Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Handset emergency stop buttons failing to operate independently when other handset parts are damaged

Wider context from the report

“(3) I have concerns with regard to the Eschmann Group in relation to a review of the operation of handsets attached to operating tables in view of the number of unexplained and uncontrolled movements of operating tables with particular reference to the isolation of the emergency stop button on the handsets to ensure that the emergency stop button operates in all circumstances when there is damage to other parts of the handset. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate staff training and auditing of pre-operative equipment checks

Wider context from the report

“(2) I have concerns with regard to the Wrightington, Wigan & Leigh NHS Foundation Trust in relation to i) The function of operating tables and handsets particularly the review of all operating tables and handsets used at the Hospital following the incident on the 27th March 2013. ii) Pre-operation checks of equipment particularly the function of handsets attached to operating tables with particular attention to the general condition of the handsets, the seals, and the position of the handsets at the side of the operating table to avoid the handsets being placed on the floor of the Operating Theatre to reduce the risk of fluid ingress. iii) The procedures relating to inspection of operating tables and handsets used at the Hospital particularly to identify any damage to the handsets to ensure the immediate replacement of any damaged handsets. iv) The training of staff in relation to pre-operative checks of equipment in the operating theatres at the Hospital with emphasis on operating tables and handsets including the correct positioning of the handsets with effective auditing of such inspections. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable pre-operative preparation and safety checks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Pre-operation checks failing to assess handset function, condition, seals and position

Wider context from the report

“(2) I have concerns with regard to the Wrightington, Wigan & Leigh NHS Foundation Trust in relation to i) The function of operating tables and handsets particularly the review of all operating tables and handsets used at the Hospital following the incident on the 27th March 2013. ii) Pre-operation checks of equipment particularly the function of handsets attached to operating tables with particular attention to the general condition of the handsets, the seals, and the position of the handsets at the side of the operating table to avoid the handsets being placed on the floor of the Operating Theatre to reduce the risk of fluid ingress. iii) The procedures relating to inspection of operating tables and handsets used at the Hospital particularly to identify any damage to the handsets to ensure the immediate replacement of any damaged handsets. iv) The training of staff in relation to pre-operative checks of equipment in the operating theatres at the Hospital with emphasis on operating tables and handsets including the correct positioning of the handsets with effective auditing of such inspections. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable pre-operative preparation and safety checks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inspection procedures failing to identify handset damage and secure immediate replacement

Wider context from the report

“(2) I have concerns with regard to the Wrightington, Wigan & Leigh NHS Foundation Trust in relation to i) The function of operating tables and handsets particularly the review of all operating tables and handsets used at the Hospital following the incident on the 27th March 2013. ii) Pre-operation checks of equipment particularly the function of handsets attached to operating tables with particular attention to the general condition of the handsets, the seals, and the position of the handsets at the side of the operating table to avoid the handsets being placed on the floor of the Operating Theatre to reduce the risk of fluid ingress. iii) The procedures relating to inspection of operating tables and handsets used at the Hospital particularly to identify any damage to the handsets to ensure the immediate replacement of any damaged handsets. iv) The training of staff in relation to pre-operative checks of equipment in the operating theatres at the Hospital with emphasis on operating tables and handsets including the correct positioning of the handsets with effective auditing of such inspections. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to share investigation information with interested agencies promptly

Wider context from the report

“(4) I have concerns with regard to the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in relation to contact with all interested Agencies following an investigation to ensure the sharing of information with all interested Agencies particularly to enable lessons to be learned and corrective action to be taken as soon as possible. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable national sharing of safety-critical incident information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review operating tables and handsets used at the Hospital

Wider context from the report

“(2) I have concerns with regard to the Wrightington, Wigan & Leigh NHS Foundation Trust in relation to i) The function of operating tables and handsets particularly the review of all operating tables and handsets used at the Hospital following the incident on the 27th March 2013. ii) Pre-operation checks of equipment particularly the function of handsets attached to operating tables with particular attention to the general condition of the handsets, the seals, and the position of the handsets at the side of the operating table to avoid the handsets being placed on the floor of the Operating Theatre to reduce the risk of fluid ingress. iii) The procedures relating to inspection of operating tables and handsets used at the Hospital particularly to identify any damage to the handsets to ensure the immediate replacement of any damaged handsets. iv) The training of staff in relation to pre-operative checks of equipment in the operating theatres at the Hospital with emphasis on operating tables and handsets including the correct positioning of the handsets with effective auditing of such inspections. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold the arranged discussion with the MHRA to strengthen future communication and information sharing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We note in your letter your concerns about communications between the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency and the Trust. We have contacted the MHRA to request a discussion to strengthen communication and sharing of information in the future. We are pleased to confirm that this has been arranged for Monday 10 February 2014.”

Source location

2013-0367-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS
Page 3 · response
Published 19 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement and disseminate a theatre-preparation procedure requiring operating-table checks before daily lists.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A Standard Operating Procedure for the preparation of Theatres prior to commencement of their daily list was ratified and disseminated in December 2013. Checks on the theatre tables must be performed as part of this SOP.”

Source location

2013-0367-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a daily checklist for critical equipment across all theatres, with sign-off and monthly auditing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition we have developed a daily checklist for all critical equipment, in all theatres across the trust, which must be signed by the person performing the checks and audited on a monthly basis. The disciplinary procedure for non compliance is quite clear within the ‘Preparation of RAEI & Leigh Theatres SOP’. This policy is currently under review to include Wrightington Theatres.”

Source location

2013-0367-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a theatre-staff training system and matrix covering medical-device competence, compliance records, assessments and manufacturer guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have reviewed our staff training and now have a more robust system and matrix for training theatre staff maintaining records of training compliance. Building on the self assessment packs developed within the Trust for medical devices we have expanded our data base within theatres to cover all medical devices including medium and low risk items. Staff are assessed on competence and knowledge of devices and further training given as required. The medical device packs also include manufacturer’s user instructions and cleaning instructions.”

Source location

2013-0367-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS
Page 3 · response
Published 19 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and complete safety checks of all operating tables using Trust checklists based on manufacturer manuals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has four different types of powered operating theatre tables in use and a total of twenty-four units. All theatre tables are maintained via external maintenance contracts. Since this incident, the Trust has developed its own checklist for each type of table based on the Manufacturers User Manuals. The Trusts own qualified Medical Engineering Technicians have undertaken thorough checks of all operating tables against these checklists to confirm their safety for use. The completed checklists will be attached to work orders as evidence of the findings should remedial actions be required.”

Source location

2013-0367-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the theatre-preparation procedure to extend it to Wrightington Theatres.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition we have developed a daily checklist for all critical equipment, in all theatres across the trust, which must be signed by the person performing the checks and audited on a monthly basis. The disciplinary procedure for non compliance is quite clear within the ‘Preparation of RAEI & Leigh Theatres SOP’. This policy is currently under review to include Wrightington Theatres.”

Source location

2013-0367-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing maintenance contracts and theatre preparation checks are considered sufficient to identify damage to operating tables and handsets.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As outlined above, all operating tables are covered by external maintenance contracts. The two RX Eschmann tables have been serviced since the incident by the contracted provider, Eschmann Group in addition to the Trusts own inspection outlined previously.”

Source location

2013-0367-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2013

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Prepare a business case seeking approval to replace the two remaining Eschmann RX-series tables.

    Stated by Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 December 2013.
  2. 2

    Remove the operating table involved in the incident from service.

    Stated by Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2013.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prepare a business case seeking approval to replace the two remaining Eschmann RX-series tables.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the investigation, the table involved in this serious incident has been taken out of service and is no longer in use at the Trust. There are two other Eschmann RX series tables in use (an RX500 and an RX600). These have been serviced in October 2013 and November 2013 respectively. A proposal to replace these tables has been taken to the Trusts Capital Medical Equipment Group and a business case is being prepared to secure approval to replace both tables.”

Source location

2013-0367-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remove the operating table involved in the incident from service.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the investigation, the table involved in this serious incident has been taken out of service and is no longer in use at the Trust. There are two other Eschmann RX series tables in use (an RX500 and an RX600). These have been serviced in October 2013 and November 2013 respectively. A proposal to replace these tables has been taken to the Trusts Capital Medical Equipment Group and a business case is being prepared to secure approval to replace both tables.”

Source location

2013-0367-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2013

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026