PFD report

Michael Ernest Kerslake · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Jun 2025•Somerset

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of a risk assessment warning workers about the risks of using machinery near electrical equipment
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety controls for high-risk machinery work
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Further safety work at the sold incident site cannot be undertaken because the respondent has no influence over its tenants.

    Stated by Kenny And Murphy LimitedOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a risk assessment warning workers about the risks of using machinery near electrical equipment

Wider context from the report

“1. There was no risk assessment in place warning workers on the estate of the risks of using machinery in the vicinity of electrical equipment. 2. Kenny & Murphy no longer own the estate in question but they own other sites. 3. It remains the case that no risk assessment as described above is in place. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety controls for high-risk machinery work.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Further safety work at the sold incident site cannot be undertaken because the respondent has no influence over its tenants.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Kenny & Murphy Ltd sold the incident site together with the main part of the Estate in March, 2024 and so have no influence over those tenants. Kenny & Murphy Ltd currently own one site at Bridgwater and a 50% interest in two sites at Southampton. We have undertaken an assessment on all three sites and submit that they differ from the incident site as they only have one tenant per site and there are no shared areas outside of their individual control and responsibility. None of the sites has any H Pole within its boundary or any transformer to handle incoming electricity at the same 11000v level. However, I have taken steps to discuss with the tenants the concerns raised by yourself regarding working safely around electricity and have also provided the tenants with the NGED "Stay Away Stay Safe!" leaflet and a copy of the HSE Electricity at Work Safe Working Practice document HSG85.”

Source location

Response from Kenny & Murphy Ltd
Page 1 · response
Published 14 July 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Discuss safe working around electricity with tenants at the three sites.

    Stated by Kenny And Murphy LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 July 2025.
  2. 2

    Assess all three sites for differences relevant to electricity safety risks.

    Stated by Kenny And Murphy LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 July 2025.
  3. 3

    Provide tenants with the NGED “Stay Away Stay Safe!” leaflet and HSE Electricity at Work Safe Working Practice document HSG85.

    Stated by Kenny And Murphy LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 July 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss safe working around electricity with tenants at the three sites.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Kenny & Murphy Ltd sold the incident site together with the main part of the Estate in March, 2024 and so have no influence over those tenants. Kenny & Murphy Ltd currently own one site at Bridgwater and a 50% interest in two sites at Southampton. We have undertaken an assessment on all three sites and submit that they differ from the incident site as they only have one tenant per site and there are no shared areas outside of their individual control and responsibility. None of the sites has any H Pole within its boundary or any transformer to handle incoming electricity at the same 11000v level. However, I have taken steps to discuss with the tenants the concerns raised by yourself regarding working safely around electricity and have also provided the tenants with the NGED "Stay Away Stay Safe!" leaflet and a copy of the HSE Electricity at Work Safe Working Practice document HSG85.”

Source location

Response from Kenny & Murphy Ltd
Page 1 · response
Published 14 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess all three sites for differences relevant to electricity safety risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Kenny & Murphy Ltd sold the incident site together with the main part of the Estate in March, 2024 and so have no influence over those tenants. Kenny & Murphy Ltd currently own one site at Bridgwater and a 50% interest in two sites at Southampton. We have undertaken an assessment on all three sites and submit that they differ from the incident site as they only have one tenant per site and there are no shared areas outside of their individual control and responsibility. None of the sites has any H Pole within its boundary or any transformer to handle incoming electricity at the same 11000v level. However, I have taken steps to discuss with the tenants the concerns raised by yourself regarding working safely around electricity and have also provided the tenants with the NGED "Stay Away Stay Safe!" leaflet and a copy of the HSE Electricity at Work Safe Working Practice document HSG85.”

Source location

Response from Kenny & Murphy Ltd
Page 1 · response
Published 14 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide tenants with the NGED “Stay Away Stay Safe!” leaflet and HSE Electricity at Work Safe Working Practice document HSG85.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Kenny & Murphy Ltd sold the incident site together with the main part of the Estate in March, 2024 and so have no influence over those tenants. Kenny & Murphy Ltd currently own one site at Bridgwater and a 50% interest in two sites at Southampton. We have undertaken an assessment on all three sites and submit that they differ from the incident site as they only have one tenant per site and there are no shared areas outside of their individual control and responsibility. None of the sites has any H Pole within its boundary or any transformer to handle incoming electricity at the same 11000v level. However, I have taken steps to discuss with the tenants the concerns raised by yourself regarding working safely around electricity and have also provided the tenants with the NGED "Stay Away Stay Safe!" leaflet and a copy of the HSE Electricity at Work Safe Working Practice document HSG85.”

Source location

Response from Kenny & Murphy Ltd
Page 1 · response
Published 14 July 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026