PFD report

Richard Stephen LITTLEWOOD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Jun 2023•East Riding and Hull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Repeated incidents on a particular stretch or bend of the A1033
  2. Failure to set a timescale for assessment of additional road markings
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road markings for road-user safety
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Replace chevron signs warning of bends for traffic approaching from both directions.

    Stated by East Riding of Yorkshire CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 July 2023.
  2. Action

    Complete winter and summer visibility surveys to assess sightlines around the bends against the 40mph speed limit and existing centre lines.

    Stated by East Riding of Yorkshire CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 July 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Visibility is suitable for the 40mph limit and existing hazard warning centre lines are appropriate; no additional works are planned.

    Stated by East Riding of Yorkshire CouncilExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Repeated incidents on a particular stretch or bend of the A1033

Wider context from the report

“(1) Evidence was heard that, on this particular stretch/bend of the A1033, there have been 3 incidents that have occurred within a short space of time. • A fatality leading to the death of Mr Littlewood in July 2022. • A fatality leading to the death of another male in November 2022. • An incident involving a farm vehicle which shed its load in late June/early July 2022 (very little details are known of this, suffice that it occurred near the location of the bend in the road where Mr Littlewood died, albeit on the opposite side). I do acknowledge that each of these incidents are completely different scenarios. It may be worthwhile to note that it is local road users that have been involved in all the incidents. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to set a timescale for assessment of additional road markings

Wider context from the report

“(2) During evidence it was heard that signage and road markings have been discussed between the police and Highways that may make the road safer. Some signage had been put in place but an assessment needs to be completed for additional road markings and the timings for this were unclear. I am aware that after every fatality in this area the police and the Highways liaise with each other over signage/road markings as a matter of course. I have concerns only regarding the fact that no timescale had been set for the assessment to take place. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road markings for road-user safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Replace chevron signs warning of bends for traffic approaching from both directions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The chevron signs warning of the bends facing traffic in both directions have been replaced. This work was carried out in July 2023.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 1 · response
Published 3 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete winter and summer visibility surveys to assess sightlines around the bends against the 40mph speed limit and existing centre lines.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. A winter visibility survey was undertaken at the bends on 17th January 2023.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 1 · response
Published 3 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Visibility is suitable for the 40mph limit and existing hazard warning centre lines are appropriate; no additional works are planned.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. These surveys confirmed that the visibility available around the bends is suitable for the 40mph speed limit that is in place and that the existing hazard warning centre lines are appropriate.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 1 · response
Published 3 July 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Continue monitoring the condition of the highway and signing at the site.

    Stated by East Riding of Yorkshire CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 July 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring the condition of the highway and signing at the site.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There are no additional works planned at this site, though we will continue to monitor the condition of the highway and signing.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 1 · response
Published 3 July 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026