PFD report

Daniel Lee HODGIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Apr 2015•Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of an effective Environment Agency notification system for critical river levels
  2. Unprotected towpath without railings
  3. Failure to close and lock the Dorset Street gate when river levels reach the threshold
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Develop automatic river-level alerts using Environment Agency gauge data.

    Stated by Shropshire CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 20 April 2015.
  2. Action

    Add or improve barriers along the towpath where the existing provision is considered necessary.

    Stated by Shropshire CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 April 2015.
  3. Action

    Send SMS flood alerts to council, highways, police and emergency-planning contacts to support timely gate closure.

    Stated by Shropshire CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 20 April 2015.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Additional towpath barriers cannot yet be determined pending structural assessment and engineering judgment about access, flood damage and maintenance impacts.

    Stated by Shropshire CouncilUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of an effective Environment Agency notification system for critical river levels

Wider context from the report

“(1) According to a Shropshire Council plan of the Dorset Street area the gate at Dorset Street leading to the towpath should have been closed and locked when the water level at the Welsh Bridge gauge reached 1.95 meters. (2) At between 5 a.m. and 6 a.m. on the 23rd November 2014 when the deceased most likely entered the water, the level at the Welsh Bridge gauge was recorded at between 2.00 and 1.99 meters. (3) Had the gate been closed and locked the deceased would have been unable to pass through. (4) No clear system was established whereby the Environment Agency notified, or was required to notify, Shropshire Council as to the water level or likelihood of the water level reaching 1.95 meters at the Welsh Bridge gauge. The Council’s instruction to close and lock the gate at Dorset Street was found to fail, there being no effective system in place to achieve the same. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unprotected towpath without railings

Wider context from the report

“(6) The concerns raised here not only affect those adversely affected by alcohol but anyone who may be unfamiliar with the area when the river is in flood and is dangerously high covering the towpath. For completeness, and this does not directly concern the Environment Agency, there was a recent reported incident of a pram being blown into the River Severn where the towpath was unprotected by railings. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to close and lock the Dorset Street gate when river levels reach the threshold

Wider context from the report

“(1) According to a Shropshire Council plan of the Dorset Street area the gate at Dorset Street leading to the towpath should have been closed and locked when the water level at the Welsh Bridge gauge reached 1.95 meters. (2) At between 5 a.m. and 6 a.m. on the 23rd November 2014 when the deceased most likely entered the water, the level at the Welsh Bridge gauge was recorded at between 2.00 and 1.99 meters. (3) Had the gate been closed and locked the deceased would have been unable to pass through. (4) No clear system was established whereby the Environment Agency notified, or was required to notify, Shropshire Council as to the water level or likelihood of the water level reaching 1.95 meters at the Welsh Bridge gauge. The Council’s instruction to close and lock the gate at Dorset Street was found to fail, there being no effective system in place to achieve the same. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Dangerously high floodwater covering the towpath

Wider context from the report

“(6) The concerns raised here not only affect those adversely affected by alcohol but anyone who may be unfamiliar with the area when the river is in flood and is dangerously high covering the towpath. For completeness, and this does not directly concern the Environment Agency, there was a recent reported incident of a pram being blown into the River Severn where the towpath was unprotected by railings. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop automatic river-level alerts using Environment Agency gauge data.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Environment Agency have, however, been looking at the relationship between river levels at their Montford Bridge river level gauge and the Welsh Bridge gauge. We have asked that they work to levels of 1.6 meters at the Welsh Bridge gauge, to be on the cautious side. Their analysis indicates that when levels reach 2.78 meters at Montford Bridge, then the levels will exceed 1.6 meters at the Welsh Bridge within 4 to 8 hours. The Environment Agency is unable, at this time, to provide flood warnings for levels of 1.6 meters, but they do have regularly updated “river levels”, shown on their website. Shropshire Council have engaged the services of local software company to assist in taking the information from the website and generating automatic “alerts” when levels reach 2.78 meters at the Montford Bridge gauge.”

Source location

2015-0146-Response-by-Shropshire-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 20 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add or improve barriers along the towpath where the existing provision is considered necessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From concern numbered 6 from your Regulation 28 Report it is understood that consideration be given to additional barriers along the towpath. The area of particular concern, to both yourself and myself, is the length from the English Bridge down to the Weir. My concerns are raised further with the development of a University in the town, particularly as properties in the Castlefields area lend themselves to student accommodation. To this end I have requested a structural report on the integrity of the towpath facing wall. We have had a collapse in another part of town and have to undertake regular maintenance on this section of most concern. With that information we can determine what is possible or what needs to be done to make it possible. In the meantime we have reviewed the existing provision and added or improved barriers as felt necessary.”

Source location

2015-0146-Response-by-Shropshire-Council
Page 3 · response
Published 20 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Send SMS flood alerts to council, highways, police and emergency-planning contacts to support timely gate closure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At the time of this reply to the Regulation 28 Report this development work has not been completed. It is our intention to send a SMS (text) message to; the Central Highways Emergency Phone (operated 24 hours a day 365 days per year by a Highways Technician, who is familiar with all gate locations on the River Severn in Shrewsbury and the closure procedures), the Police Control Room, Shropshire Councils Emergency Planning Unit on call phone and the Shropshire Council Car Park Commissioner. It is believed that through this process the necessary people will get notification to ensure timely closure of the gates, before the towpath is likely to be submerged in flood waters.”

Source location

2015-0146-Response-by-Shropshire-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 20 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage Shropshire County Council to support its use of Environment Agency river-level information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have spoken to Shropshire County Council to help them make full use of the information that we provide. We have produced a technical briefing note for the council, to help them implement a system for closing the gate at Dorset Street using the live information we put on the internet. The briefing note is enclosed with this letter.”

Source location

2015-0146-Response-by-Environment-Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 20 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Produce a technical briefing note to help the council implement a Dorset Street gate-closing system using live river-level information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have spoken to Shropshire County Council to help them make full use of the information that we provide. We have produced a technical briefing note for the council, to help them implement a system for closing the gate at Dorset Street using the live information we put on the internet. The briefing note is enclosed with this letter.”

Source location

2015-0146-Response-by-Environment-Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 20 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Additional towpath barriers cannot yet be determined pending structural assessment and engineering judgment about access, flood damage and maintenance impacts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From concern numbered 6 from your Regulation 28 Report it is understood that consideration be given to additional barriers along the towpath. The area of particular concern, to both yourself and myself, is the length from the English Bridge down to the Weir. My concerns are raised further with the development of a University in the town, particularly as properties in the Castlefields area lend themselves to student accommodation. To this end I have requested a structural report on the integrity of the towpath facing wall. We have had a collapse in another part of town and have to undertake regular maintenance on this section of most concern. With that information we can determine what is possible or what needs to be done to make it possible. In the meantime we have reviewed the existing provision and added or improved barriers as felt necessary.”

Source location

2015-0146-Response-by-Shropshire-Council
Page 3 · response
Published 20 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Environment Agency cannot currently provide flood warnings for Welsh Bridge levels of 1.6 metres.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Environment Agency have, however, been looking at the relationship between river levels at their Montford Bridge river level gauge and the Welsh Bridge gauge. We have asked that they work to levels of 1.6 meters at the Welsh Bridge gauge, to be on the cautious side. Their analysis indicates that when levels reach 2.78 meters at Montford Bridge, then the levels will exceed 1.6 meters at the Welsh Bridge within 4 to 8 hours. The Environment Agency is unable, at this time, to provide flood warnings for levels of 1.6 meters, but they do have regularly updated “river levels”, shown on their website. Shropshire Council have engaged the services of local software company to assist in taking the information from the website and generating automatic “alerts” when levels reach 2.78 meters at the Montford Bridge gauge.”

Source location

2015-0146-Response-by-Shropshire-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 20 April 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Request a structural report on the towpath-facing wall to inform possible safety measures.

    Stated by Shropshire CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 April 2015.
  2. 2

    Develop and install high-resolution CCTV cameras with control-room feeds and safety alert capabilities along the river corridor.

    Stated by Shropshire CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 20 April 2015.
  3. 3

    Implement a multi-agency River Safety action plan with recurring operational, tactical and strategic coordination meetings.

    Stated by Shropshire CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 20 April 2015.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request a structural report on the towpath-facing wall to inform possible safety measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From concern numbered 6 from your Regulation 28 Report it is understood that consideration be given to additional barriers along the towpath. The area of particular concern, to both yourself and myself, is the length from the English Bridge down to the Weir. My concerns are raised further with the development of a University in the town, particularly as properties in the Castlefields area lend themselves to student accommodation. To this end I have requested a structural report on the integrity of the towpath facing wall. We have had a collapse in another part of town and have to undertake regular maintenance on this section of most concern. With that information we can determine what is possible or what needs to be done to make it possible. In the meantime we have reviewed the existing provision and added or improved barriers as felt necessary.”

Source location

2015-0146-Response-by-Shropshire-Council
Page 3 · response
Published 20 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and install high-resolution CCTV cameras with control-room feeds and safety alert capabilities along the river corridor.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the above we are looking to provide CCTV cameras, one looking up from the Railway Bridge to the English Bridge, one looking down the Weir. These will be high resolution cameras that feed into the CCTV Control Room and will be fitted with alerts that can be set to identify loitering on the towpath and hopefully will be provided with software that is capable of spotting potential bodies in the river and monitor river levels. This will happen in tandem with the work on the Environmental Agency monitoring gauges. We are in early discussions with the suppliers but they are confident they will be able to deliver this.”

Source location

2015-0146-Response-by-Shropshire-Council
Page 4 · response
Published 20 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a multi-agency River Safety action plan with recurring operational, tactical and strategic coordination meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The closure of the gates is only part of the issue surrounding river safety and through consideration of previous Regulation 43 Reports to Shropshire Council and our desire to continually improve safety, Shropshire Council continue to review river safety. In January this year, I visited the river in the evening with the Police Chief Inspector, Town Centre Inspector and the Town Clerk for Shrewsbury Town Council. It was felt that these are the parties which might work more effectively together to improve river safety. The Town Council provide the lighting along the towpath. At that time we had developed an embryonic “Team Shrewsbury” approach to protecting public realm, addressing issues such as; drugs misuse, antisocial behaviour, environmental crime and other criminal activity, by working more closely together. It was felt that river safety leant itself to this approach.”

Source location

2015-0146-Response-by-Shropshire-Council
Page 3 · response
Published 20 April 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026