PFD report

Teresa Chmielek · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Nov 2023•Manchester North

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
9

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised9

  1. Failure to conduct meaningful multi-team discussion at screening MDT meetings
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient multi-disciplinary coordination in mental health care
  2. Failure to record and confirm communication of referral rejection reasons
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable communication to referrers about referral service access and expectations
  3. Failure to record recent suicide attempts in screening MDT notes
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable recording of safety-critical mental health informationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable recording of suicide-risk information
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to conduct meaningful multi-team discussion at screening MDT meetings

Wider context from the report

“(2) The Court heard that the practice at the screening MDT meeting was for the SPoE Nurse to read out the contents of the referral to the Psychiatrist who would then advise on next steps. There was no evidence to show that any form of meaningful multi-team discussion took place at the screening MDT meeting ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient multi-disciplinary coordination in mental health care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record and confirm communication of referral rejection reasons

Wider context from the report

“(4) The Consultant Psychiatrist present at the MDT meeting has no recollection of discussing the referral and whilst the evidence was that a letter to the GP practice explaining the reason for rejecting the referral was generated there is no record of this letter on the Trust's electronic systems or having been received by the GP practice ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable communication to referrers about referral service access and expectations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record recent suicide attempts in screening MDT notes

Wider context from the report

“(1) The notes made by the SPoE Nurse for use during discussion at the screening MDT meeting did not include any reference to the report of a recent suicide attempt and the Court was not satisfied that the risk of suicide had been identified or recognised by the SPoE Nurse ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable recording of safety-critical mental health information; Unreliable recording of suicide-risk information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make direct contact with referred patients before rejecting referrals

Wider context from the report

“(3) There was no direct contact between the mental health team and the Deceased (either by telephone or in person) before the decision to reject the referral was made ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of audit of SPoE referral management and related decision-making

Wider context from the report

“(7) There is currently no system by which the management of referrals into the SPoE and related decision-making are audited. As such there is a risk that poor quality decision-making is going unchecked. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a Standard Operating Procedure for managing SPoE Older Adults referrals

Wider context from the report

“(6) There is currently no Standard Operating Procedure on how referrals into the SPoE Older Adults should be managed ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to identify or recognise suicide risk during referral screening

Wider context from the report

“(1) The notes made by the SPoE Nurse for use during discussion at the screening MDT meeting did not include any reference to the report of a recent suicide attempt and the Court was not satisfied that the risk of suicide had been identified or recognised by the SPoE Nurse ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate mental health risk assessment; Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk; Unreliable identification of urgent mental-health needs during initial screening.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of referral cover during SPoE Nurse absence

Wider context from the report

“(5) The evidence was that there is no member of staff allocated to deal with referrals when the SPoE Nurse is absent from work which means that during their absence, urgent referrals are not being reviewed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate contingency planning for safe patient care during staffing shortages.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to discuss referrals during consultant psychiatric review

Wider context from the report

“(4) The Consultant Psychiatrist present at the MDT meeting has no recollection of discussing the referral and whilst the evidence was that a letter to the GP practice explaining the reason for rejecting the referral was generated there is no record of this letter on the Trust's electronic systems or having been received by the GP practice ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide effective consultant psychiatrist oversight in mental health care.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.