PFD report

Aeran Luke Sebastian Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 31 Jan 2025•West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of readily available, fully funded, long-term rehabilitation and substance-abuse recovery for veterans with PTSD
  2. Lack of formal clinical mental-health assessment at discharge
  3. Failure to inquire into possible PTSD or other reasons for illicit drug use after an operational tour
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Ensure continued efforts to increase awareness of regimental welfare associations among current and former personnel.

    Stated by Ministry of DefenceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 February 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Post-transition healthcare for veterans is delivered by statutory health services in collaboration with the third sector.

    Stated by Ministry of DefenceRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of readily available, fully funded, long-term rehabilitation and substance-abuse recovery for veterans with PTSD

Wider context from the report

“Despite the introduction of Op Courage and sharing of information between - and recognised efforts by - MoD, NHS and organisations such as Combat Stress to treat individuals, there appears to remain a lack of readily available, fully funded, long term rehabilitation and substance abuse recovery for veterans with PTSD at risk, notably for those only diagnosed well after leaving the Armed Forces, and/or who are ‘long term cases’ for whom treatment has not succeeded and/or who have relapsed after and despite such interventions. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of formal clinical mental-health assessment at discharge

Wider context from the report

“There appears to have been no formal, clinical assessment of mental health at point of discharge, which may have identified the emergence of PTSD. I understand this may now be routine, or more prevalent, but there remains a community of veterans at risk for whom no such assessment may have been in place. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to inquire into possible PTSD or other reasons for illicit drug use after an operational tour

Wider context from the report

“When found to have taken illicit drugs months after completing an operational tour, there appears to have been no inquiry or check as to possible correlation with potential PTSD or other reasons for the behaviour, such as a lack of effective post-tour decompression. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of veteran awareness of regimental welfare staff and their role in the veteran support landscape

Wider context from the report

“I heard evidence of a lack of awareness of regimental welfare staff and the role such organisations can play in supporting veterans. Again, those now serving may be more aware but there appears to be a community of veterans at risk who remain unaware, including as to how such organisations fit and work within the overall veteran support landscape. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to and navigation of veteran support services.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure continued efforts to increase awareness of regimental welfare associations among current and former personnel.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Raising awareness of the support available will include the promotion of regimental welfare associations, whom I agree have an important role to play. While membership is voluntary, each Regimental or Corps Headquarters in the Army has an Association or equivalent for its serving personnel and veterans. In Mr Taylor’s regiment, the RRF, everyone who has served is entitled to be a member and receive support from the Regimental Charity, The Fusiliers Aid Society (FAS), who I understand did provide Mr Taylor with support. I know that the RRF ensure that all Fusiliers are briefed on joining and discharge on the support available to them. However, I accept that does not mean support and awareness is universal, but I would highlight that Regimental and Corps Headquarters are working to increase awareness of their Associations to current and former personnel. I will ensure that this continues.”

Source location

Response from Ministry of Defence
Page 2 · response
Published 3 February 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Post-transition healthcare for veterans is delivered by statutory health services in collaboration with the third sector.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The delivery of support for veterans, including long term treatment, is a multi-agency effort. On discharge, the MOD makes every effort to ensure individuals are appropriately transitioned into civilian life and that aftercare is in place should this be required. Support”

Source location

Response from Ministry of Defence
Page 1 · response
Published 3 February 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing discharge assessments and Structured Mental Health Assessments are considered sufficient to identify possible links between service and drug-related behaviour.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is evident from Mr Taylor’s service records that checks were made as part of the discharge process to establish any mitigating factors which may have led to his drug use. Mr Taylor was interviewed following a positive compulsory drug test and his mental health was reviewed by the Medical Officer as part of his release medical. No significant concerns were noted on the contemporaneous record to indicate a possible correlation with potential PTSD, or other reasons for the behaviour. As you highlight, clinical mental health assessments are routine and since 2012, all personnel at discharge medicals or boards potentially leading to discharge undergo a Structured Mental Health Assessment (SMHA).”

Source location

Response from Ministry of Defence
Page 1 · response
Published 3 February 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Continue raising awareness of support available to the Armed Forces community.

    Stated by Ministry of DefenceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 February 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue raising awareness of support available to the Armed Forces community.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I hope my response is clear and reassures you that there are sufficient processes in place to identify any possible correlations between an individual’s service and a behaviour. Ensuring veterans can access the support available to them is a priority for me, and this Government. We will continue to work hard to raise awareness of the support available to our Armed Forces community to ensure it does not go unnoticed by those who most need it.”

Source location

Response from Ministry of Defence
Page 2 · response
Published 3 February 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026