PFD report

Cheryl Dawn Lorna Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Sep 2025•Hertfordshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised1

  1. Excessive speed limit on the specified stretch of Sarratt Road
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Maintain the current speed limit at this location while focusing on systemic road-safety improvements.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 September 2025.
  2. Action

    Review the Speed Management Strategy, including area-wide rural approaches and rural speed-limit requirements.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 September 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    Available evidence indicates excessive speed was not a cause; visibility and reaction time were the key contributory factors.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Excessive speed limit on the specified stretch of Sarratt Road

Wider context from the report

“(1) That the speed limit of 60mph is too high for the stretch of Sarratt Road between the M25 over-bridge and the speed restriction sign for Sarratt Village. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain the current speed limit at this location while focusing on systemic road-safety improvements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• In light of the evidence in relation to speed, and in line with the Department for Transport Circular 01/2013 and our Speed Management Strategy, we will maintain the current limit, focusing on systemic improvements rather than changing the speed limit for an isolated hazard.”

Source location

Response from Hertfordshire County Council
Page 3 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the Speed Management Strategy, including area-wide rural approaches and rural speed-limit requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will consider area wide rural speed management approaches as part of our Speed Management Strategy review, which is underway, and strengthen messaging to the public to explain speed limits and road user behaviour in a rural context.”

Source location

Response from Hertfordshire County Council
Page 3 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Available evidence indicates excessive speed was not a cause; visibility and reaction time were the key contributory factors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Speed: The Police Investigation Report estimated impact speed between 24–44mph; no evidence of excessive speed was found. Separate evidence shows that mean vehicle speeds on Sarratt Road are typically 30–40mph, significantly below the national speed limit. We acknowledge that speed has been cited as a proxy cause of the incident, suggesting the driver of the car had insufficient time to respond in the situation.”

Source location

Response from Hertfordshire County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The current speed limit will be maintained because it remains consistent with evidence, police advice and applicable speed-management strategies.

Verbatim wording from the response

““…the police Traffic Management Officer opinion is that the speed limit does not need to be reduced and remains within the consistency and parameters of speed management strategies.””

Source location

Response from Hertfordshire County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The speed limit need not be reduced because it remains consistent with local and national speed management strategies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Furthermore this road has had only 1 fatality /serious collision in the last 5 years, speed limit was not evidenced as a key issue within the forensic collision report, albeit analysis was difficult due to the nature of the collision and relying on pedestrian throw distance, therefore the police Traffic Management Officer opinion is that the speed limit does not need to be reduced and remains within the consistency and parameters of speed management strategies.”

Source location

Response from Road Policing Unit
Page 2 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hertfordshire County Council is responsible for determining any road safety solutions using its expert assessment and applicable strategies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Both documents seek to ensure consistency across similar road types and speed setting should not be a singular solution to any safety concerns for a road where road death and injury rates are known to be high. Therefore, the refined, considered and nuanced Roads Policing position, on behalf of Hertfordshire Constabulary, is this: that any determination on road safety solutions, if any, should be at the considered direction of HCC as the responsible authority utilising their own expert assessment and being consistent with local and national strategy.”

Source location

Response from Road Policing Unit
Page 2 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.8

  1. 1

    Review frontage design constraints and address them through appropriate processes to meet safety standards.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 September 2025.
  2. 2

    Strengthen public messaging explaining rural speed limits and road-user behaviour.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 September 2025.
  3. 3

    Apply targeted vegetation clearance to safety-critical sightlines while retaining visual cues discouraging higher speeds.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 September 2025.
  4. 4

    Strengthen public messaging about third-party vegetation responsibilities.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 September 2025.
  5. 5

    Continue the internal review of vegetation management processes to improve safety-critical sightline management.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 September 2025.
  6. 6

    Strengthen liaison with the coroner’s office to improve investigation recommendation timelines and clarity.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 September 2025.
  7. 7

    Establish regular multi-agency collision review meetings after life-changing, serious or fatal collisions.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 September 2025.
  8. 8

    Highlight property-owner vegetation requirements through the planning process.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 September 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review frontage design constraints and address them through appropriate processes to meet safety standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Review frontage design constraints and address these through appropriate processes to ensure safety standards are met, without creating community conflict.”

Source location

Response from Hertfordshire County Council
Page 3 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen public messaging explaining rural speed limits and road-user behaviour.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will consider area wide rural speed management approaches as part of our Speed Management Strategy review, which is underway, and strengthen messaging to the public to explain speed limits and road user behaviour in a rural context.”

Source location

Response from Hertfordshire County Council
Page 3 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Apply targeted vegetation clearance to safety-critical sightlines while retaining visual cues discouraging higher speeds.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Apply targeted vegetation clearance for safety critical sightlines, while maintaining visual cues that discourage higher speeds.”

Source location

Response from Hertfordshire County Council
Page 3 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen public messaging about third-party vegetation responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Strengthen our messaging to the public on third party vegetation responsibilities.”

Source location

Response from Hertfordshire County Council
Page 3 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue the internal review of vegetation management processes to improve safety-critical sightline management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Initiated internal review of vegetation management processes.”

Source location

Response from Hertfordshire County Council
Page 3 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen liaison with the coroner’s office to improve investigation recommendation timelines and clarity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Strengthen liaison with your office to improve timelines and clarity of recommendations as part of the initial investigation process.”

Source location

Response from Hertfordshire County Council
Page 4 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish regular multi-agency collision review meetings after life-changing, serious or fatal collisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Propose a regular multi-agency collision review meeting after life changing, serious or fatal collisions to identify systemic issues earlier.”

Source location

Response from Hertfordshire County Council
Page 4 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Highlight property-owner vegetation requirements through the planning process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Seek to highlight the requirements on property owners through the planning process.”

Source location

Response from Hertfordshire County Council
Page 3 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026