Stephen Paul PAGE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Dec 2025•Kent and Medway

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of sufficiently conspicuous alarm alerts for electronic sensor activation

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. the centre manager

    Arrange on-site suicide prevention awareness training delivered by an external provider.

  2. the centre manager

    Implement an audible alarm system linked to on-site security arrangements in the relevant area.

  3. the centre manager

    Enhance the physical perimeter safety measures, with completion of all measures scheduled for April 2026.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of sufficiently conspicuous alarm alerts for electronic sensor activation

Wider context from the report

“(1) Written evidence from a senior member of staff at MAPP (who provide security management at Hempstead Valley) set out that there is an electronic sensor system in place ████████The evidence was that, "When the sensor beam is broken, the corresponding CCTV camera automatically moves to the activation point and displays a visual alert marked 'Alarm'. The camera remains focused on the area to allow for monitoring if an operator is present." The investigating officer from Kent Police, said in their statement, "This 'alarm' is visual only and displays for a few seconds. Due to the number of screens, this could have been easily missed by the CCTV operator." For the avoidance of doubt, the evidence suggested that the alarm system was working and operational on 17 August 2025. Further, there was no evidence of a delayed response in this particular instance. However, it is not difficult to envisage (particularly given that there is no audible alarm) a situation in which a triggering of the 'alarm' could be missed and an opportunity for staff to intervene being lost. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Arrange on-site suicide prevention awareness training delivered by an external provider.

Verbatim wording from the response

“MAPP manage the building on behalf of our client and therefore we are responding on behalf of the centre manager (████████) whom you also address the Report to. The matters identified in the Report have been considered. In response we can confirm that action has been taken in respect of:”

Source location

Response from MAPP
Page 1 · response
Published 2 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement an audible alarm system linked to on-site security arrangements in the relevant area.

Verbatim wording from the response

“MAPP manage the building on behalf of our client and therefore we are responding on behalf of the centre manager (████████) whom you also address the Report to. The matters identified in the Report have been considered. In response we can confirm that action has been taken in respect of:”

Source location

Response from MAPP
Page 1 · response
Published 2 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Enhance the physical perimeter safety measures, with completion of all measures scheduled for April 2026.

Verbatim wording from the response

“MAPP manage the building on behalf of our client and therefore we are responding on behalf of the centre manager (████████) whom you also address the Report to. The matters identified in the Report have been considered. In response we can confirm that action has been taken in respect of:”

Source location

Response from MAPP
Page 1 · response
Published 2 February 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026