PFD report

Steven Nicholson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Mar 2016•Newcastle upon Tyne

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of appropriate flood-risk warning signage on the A1018 slip road
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signage
  2. Lack of appropriate lighting on the A1018 slip road
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate and unreliable public-road street lightingPart of recurring concern: Inadequate outdoor safety lighting
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Deploy temporary flood-warning signs until the highway drainage improvement works are complete.

    Stated by Durham County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 March 2016.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Permanent flood warning signs will not be installed because traffic-sign regulations provide only for their temporary use.

    Stated by Durham County CouncilUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of appropriate flood-risk warning signage on the A1018 slip road

Wider context from the report

“(1) The absence of appropriate lighting on the A1018 slip road, to assist motorists in identifying and reacting to sudden unexpected hazards. (2) The absence of appropriate signage warning motorists of the risk of flooding on the A1018 slip road. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road warning signage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of appropriate lighting on the A1018 slip road

Wider context from the report

“(1) The absence of appropriate lighting on the A1018 slip road, to assist motorists in identifying and reacting to sudden unexpected hazards. (2) The absence of appropriate signage warning motorists of the risk of flooding on the A1018 slip road. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate and unreliable public-road street lighting; Inadequate outdoor safety lighting.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deploy temporary flood-warning signs until the highway drainage improvement works are complete.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Absence of Flood Warning Signs The Inquest confirmed that highway flooding had occurred at this location although we were not aware of any issues prior to this incident. If we had received reports of flooding we would have deployed temporary flood warning signs in line with our standard procedures.”

Source location

Durham-City-Council-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 30 March 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Permanent flood warning signs will not be installed because traffic-sign regulations provide only for their temporary use.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Flood warning signs are prescribed in the Department for Transport’s traffic sign regulations for temporary use only to warn of occasional hazards. They should be retained only for so long as the hazard continues to exist or is expected to recur in the near future. There is no provision in the Department for Transport’s traffic sign regulations, which we are obliged to follow, for the installation of permanent flood warning signs. Therefore we do not propose to install permanent flood warning signs.”

Source location

Durham-City-Council-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 30 March 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Street lighting is not considered necessary because the existing policy and alternative drainage mitigation are considered more appropriate and effective for the flooding risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Absence of Street Lighting The Council provides street lighting in accordance with our Street Lighting Policy which was approved by our Cabinet on 20th November 2013 following extensive public consultation. The majority of consultation responses were supportive of the updated policy. Please find link to the report:”

Source location

Durham-City-Council-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 30 March 2016

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Replace existing side-entry gullies with more effective open-top gullies to improve highway drainage.

    Stated by Durham County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 March 2016.
  2. 2

    Remove blockages in the drainage system to reduce the risk of future flooding.

    Stated by Durham County CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 March 2016.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Replace existing side-entry gullies with more effective open-top gullies to improve highway drainage.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In accordance with our Street Lighting Policy and best road safety practice we consider that measures to mitigate the risk of future flooding at this location are more appropriate and effective than the installation of street lighting which would only help to illuminate any remaining flooding issue in the hours of darkness.”

Source location

Durham-City-Council-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 30 March 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remove blockages in the drainage system to reduce the risk of future flooding.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The investigations and works we have done since the incident to remove the blockages in the drainage system have significantly reduced the risk of flooding going forward. Nevertheless, I have arranged for temporary flood warning signs to be deployed until the above highway drainage improvement works are complete.”

Source location

Durham-City-Council-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 30 March 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026