PFD report

Luca Yates · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Nov 2023•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Reduction in paediatric middle grades' practical experience in neonatal resuscitation
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure staff competence in resuscitationPart of recurring concern: Inadequate competence in neonatal resuscitation
  2. Lower level of consultant general paediatricians' experience in complex neonatal resuscitation
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate competence in neonatal resuscitation
  3. Reliance on consultants who may be non-resident on call during neonatal resuscitation
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable consultant attendance when clinically required
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Require general paediatric specialty trainees to spend time in a neonatal setting.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 November 2023.
  2. Action

    Require all core trainees to spend time in a neonatal setting during training.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 November 2023.
  3. Action

    Use a formal supervisor assessment to confirm trainee readiness for tier 2 rota work.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 November 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Mandatory non-invasive airway skills, readiness assessment, consultant support and current Newborn Life Support status provide safe preparation for neonatal resuscitation.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reduction in paediatric middle grades' practical experience in neonatal resuscitation

Wider context from the report

“The court heard evidence as to planned changes to paediatric specialist training which will result in a reduction in amount of time specialty trainees are required to spend gaining experience in Level 3 Neonatal units. The following matters of concern arise from this:- 1) It is a matter of concern that paediatric middle grades may have reduced practical experience in resuscitation of neonates born in poor condition, that will increase the reliance on Consultants (who in some clinical settings may be non-resident on call depending when delivery takes place); and 2) It is a matter of concern that Consultant general paediatricians of the future will have a lower level of experience than is currently the case of complex neonatal resuscitation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure staff competence in resuscitation; Inadequate competence in neonatal resuscitation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lower level of consultant general paediatricians' experience in complex neonatal resuscitation

Wider context from the report

“The court heard evidence as to planned changes to paediatric specialist training which will result in a reduction in amount of time specialty trainees are required to spend gaining experience in Level 3 Neonatal units. The following matters of concern arise from this:- 1) It is a matter of concern that paediatric middle grades may have reduced practical experience in resuscitation of neonates born in poor condition, that will increase the reliance on Consultants (who in some clinical settings may be non-resident on call depending when delivery takes place); and 2) It is a matter of concern that Consultant general paediatricians of the future will have a lower level of experience than is currently the case of complex neonatal resuscitation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate competence in neonatal resuscitation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reliance on consultants who may be non-resident on call during neonatal resuscitation

Wider context from the report

“The court heard evidence as to planned changes to paediatric specialist training which will result in a reduction in amount of time specialty trainees are required to spend gaining experience in Level 3 Neonatal units. The following matters of concern arise from this:- 1) It is a matter of concern that paediatric middle grades may have reduced practical experience in resuscitation of neonates born in poor condition, that will increase the reliance on Consultants (who in some clinical settings may be non-resident on call depending when delivery takes place); and 2) It is a matter of concern that Consultant general paediatricians of the future will have a lower level of experience than is currently the case of complex neonatal resuscitation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable consultant attendance when clinically required.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require general paediatric specialty trainees to spend time in a neonatal setting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“E. General paediatric consultants experience of neonatal resuscitation”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 3 · response
Published 13 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require all core trainees to spend time in a neonatal setting during training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is true that there are no specific mandatory placements during core training. This is because the curricular learning outcomes and key capabilities are generic in nature and can be acquired in most settings. However, in order to meet the key capabilities related to neonatal care (see below) and to prepare trainees to be on tier 2 rotas at ST4 covering neonatal units, all trainees will spend time during their core training in a neonatal setting. Full”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 1 · response
Published 13 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use a formal supervisor assessment to confirm trainee readiness for tier 2 rota work.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The capabilities to lead neonatal resuscitation will be largely acquired and maintained through training and simulation, augmented by clinical experience. The key capabilities needed are outlined in the core syllabus document and are clearly aligned to the need for neonatal resuscitation skills. It is our view that these key capabilities, combined with our new 'readiness for tier 2 working' assessment form, and the much more specific (and safe) airway capabilities in the core curriculum do provide safe training to manage neonatal resuscitation as the first senior responder – always with consultant support available to come in from home. In addition, there continues to be a requirement to be a current Newborn Life Support (NLS) provider in order to work on the tier 2 rota.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 2 · response
Published 13 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain mandatory specialty-level capabilities for neonatal resuscitation and airway management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“70% of paediatric trainees will train as general paediatricians, of which a significant proportion will go on to work in a DGH covering a local neonatal unit or SCBU where there may be a need for neonatal resuscitation. In recognition of this, the general paediatric specialty level syllabus has mandatory key capabilities relating to neonatal resuscitation and airway management. To evidence these, trainees at specialty level following the general paediatric pathway will need to spend time in a neonatal setting again.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 3 · response
Published 13 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Mandatory non-invasive airway skills, readiness assessment, consultant support and current Newborn Life Support status provide safe preparation for neonatal resuscitation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The capabilities to lead neonatal resuscitation will be largely acquired and maintained through training and simulation, augmented by clinical experience. The key capabilities needed are outlined in the core syllabus document and are clearly aligned to the need for neonatal resuscitation skills. It is our view that these key capabilities, combined with our new 'readiness for tier 2 working' assessment form, and the much more specific (and safe) airway capabilities in the core curriculum do provide safe training to manage neonatal resuscitation as the first senior responder – always with consultant support available to come in from home. In addition, there continues to be a requirement to be a current Newborn Life Support (NLS) provider in order to work on the tier 2 rota.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 2 · response
Published 13 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Specific mandatory neonatal placements are unnecessary because capabilities can be acquired in most settings, with all trainees spending time in a neonatal setting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is true that there are no specific mandatory placements during core training. This is because the curricular learning outcomes and key capabilities are generic in nature and can be acquired in most settings. However, in order to meet the key capabilities related to neonatal care (see below) and to prepare trainees to be on tier 2 rotas at ST4 covering neonatal units, all trainees will spend time during their core training in a neonatal setting. Full”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 1 · response
Published 13 November 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Share the report for discussion with the Clinical Quality in Practice group in early Spring.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 November 2023.
  2. 2

    Mandate safe non-invasive neonatal airway management skills in the core curriculum.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 November 2023.
  3. 3

    Share information and local improvement suggestions from the report with paediatric members through the patient safety portal.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 November 2023.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    A single neonatal intubation assessment does not establish safe practice, while repeated attempts by unskilled trainees can cause harm.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the report for discussion with the Clinical Quality in Practice group in early Spring.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Sharing information for quality improvements”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 3 · response
Published 13 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Mandate safe non-invasive neonatal airway management skills in the core curriculum.

Verbatim wording from the response

“C. Airway Capabilities”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 2 · response
Published 13 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share information and local improvement suggestions from the report with paediatric members through the patient safety portal.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Sharing information for quality improvements”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 3 · response
Published 13 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A single neonatal intubation assessment does not establish safe practice, while repeated attempts by unskilled trainees can cause harm.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Previously in training, Level 1 (ST1-3) needed to have a successful DOPS for neonatal intubation. However, there are fewer neonates being intubated as part of routine neonatal care and opportunities to learn and maintain skills are increasingly limited. It is recognised that neonatal intubation in unskilled hands can be damaging, particularly if there are repeated attempts. A single successful DOPS for intubation does not make someone safe and it takes the emphasis away from developing safe, non-invasive neonatal airway management skills.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 2 · response
Published 13 November 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026