PFD report

MAUREEN MILTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Nov 2019•Staffordshire South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
6

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 6 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of awareness of petrol-based emollient fire risks
  2. Fire ignition of clothing impregnated with petrol-based emollient cream
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate controls for fire risks from paraffin-containing emollients
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Launch the emollient-risk toolkit with a press release and coordinated dissemination of key messages through stakeholder networks.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 December 2019.
  2. Action

    Communicate information about severe and fatal burns associated with paraffin-containing and paraffin-free emollients through safety communications.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2019.
  3. Action

    Design and optimise sustainable training and educational resources and their distribution and access to maintain awareness of emollient fire risks.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 December 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.6

  1. Position

    Oversight of medicine and medical-product safety and product labelling falls outside the respondent’s role.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of awareness of petrol-based emollient fire risks

Wider context from the report

“Evidence given by fire investigators was that they are increasingly attending fires involving (mostly) the elderly where there is evidence of petrol based emollient cream in use. The petrol base is found in a significant number of prescribed creams and creams (such as moisturisers) which are readily available over the counter. This cream impregnates clothing and is not washed away during a normal washing programme. In the event of a fire the victim is rapidly engulfed by flames with little chance of survival. The cause of death is generally burns, not inhalation of smoke. The concern is the lack of awareness of this problem by medical professionals, carers, victims and their families. It is felt appropriate heighten awareness of this growing problem amongst health professionals and others who work in the field of prescribing such creams and those caring for patients using petrol based emollients. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Fire ignition of clothing impregnated with petrol-based emollient cream

Wider context from the report

“Evidence given by fire investigators was that they are increasingly attending fires involving (mostly) the elderly where there is evidence of petrol based emollient cream in use. The petrol base is found in a significant number of prescribed creams and creams (such as moisturisers) which are readily available over the counter. This cream impregnates clothing and is not washed away during a normal washing programme. In the event of a fire the victim is rapidly engulfed by flames with little chance of survival. The cause of death is generally burns, not inhalation of smoke. The concern is the lack of awareness of this problem by medical professionals, carers, victims and their families. It is felt appropriate heighten awareness of this growing problem amongst health professionals and others who work in the field of prescribing such creams and those caring for patients using petrol based emollients. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for fire risks from paraffin-containing emollients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Launch the emollient-risk toolkit with a press release and coordinated dissemination of key messages through stakeholder networks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am advised that the group has met twice, most recently on 10 December 2019, and is working towards producing a toolkit of resources for patients, their carers’, healthcare professionals, health organisations and healthcare professional educators. The Government welcomes plans by the MHRA to officially launch the toolkit in 2020. This will be accompanied by a MHRA press release and stakeholders will propagate the key messages through their networks at the same time.”

Source location

2019-0396-Response-by-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Communicate information about severe and fatal burns associated with paraffin-containing and paraffin-free emollients through safety communications.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The MHRA advises that it most recently communicated information about the risk of severe and fatal burns with paraffin-containing and paraffin-free emollients in December 2018 through a press release and an article in Drug Safety Update¹. These communications resulted from an in-depth review of this issue by the MHRA’s independent expert advisory committee, the Commission on Human Medicines (CHM).”

Source location

2019-0396-Response-by-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Design and optimise sustainable training and educational resources and their distribution and access to maintain awareness of emollient fire risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“bodies, organisations that provide guidance to health and social care workers, patient representatives and organisations that speak for relevant patient populations such as the National Eczema Society. The stakeholder group is designing and optimising sustainable training and educational resources for healthcare professionals and the public and their method of distribution and access, to ensure these are impactful and maintain long-term awareness of the risk of emollient creams.”

Source location

2019-0396-Response-by-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Oversight of medicine and medical-product safety and product labelling falls outside the respondent’s role.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NICE does not have a role in overseeing the safety of medicines and medical products, or in ensuring appropriate warnings on the labels of such products. In the UK, this is the responsibility of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). In addition, NICE does not have a role in running safety awareness or educational campaigns aimed at professionals or patients and carers. The responsibility for this would rest with organisations such as the MHRA and other healthcare regulators, professional bodies and voluntary organisations and charities.”

Source location

2019-0396-Response-by-NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing prescriber information and warnings about emollient fire risks are considered adequate, leaving nothing specifically to add.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We consider that appropriate information and warnings are available to prescribers regarding the risks of fire associated with the use of paraffin-based emollient products, and that there is nothing specifically NICE can do to add to this. As explained above, an awareness or educational campaign for professionals, patients or carers on this important issue would not fall within our role.”

Source location

2019-0396-Response-by-NICE
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The MHRA is responsible for medicine and medical-product safety oversight and ensuring appropriate product warnings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NICE does not have a role in overseeing the safety of medicines and medical products, or in ensuring appropriate warnings on the labels of such products. In the UK, this is the responsibility of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). In addition, NICE does not have a role in running safety awareness or educational campaigns aimed at professionals or patients and carers. The responsibility for this would rest with organisations such as the MHRA and other healthcare regulators, professional bodies and voluntary organisations and charities.”

Source location

2019-0396-Response-by-NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Safety-awareness and educational campaigns are the responsibility of the MHRA, healthcare regulators, professional bodies, voluntary organisations and charities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NICE does not have a role in overseeing the safety of medicines and medical products, or in ensuring appropriate warnings on the labels of such products. In the UK, this is the responsibility of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). In addition, NICE does not have a role in running safety awareness or educational campaigns aimed at professionals or patients and carers. The responsibility for this would rest with organisations such as the MHRA and other healthcare regulators, professional bodies and voluntary organisations and charities.”

Source location

2019-0396-Response-by-NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Running safety-awareness or educational campaigns for professionals, patients and carers falls outside the respondent’s role.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NICE does not have a role in overseeing the safety of medicines and medical products, or in ensuring appropriate warnings on the labels of such products. In the UK, this is the responsibility of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). In addition, NICE does not have a role in running safety awareness or educational campaigns aimed at professionals or patients and carers. The responsibility for this would rest with organisations such as the MHRA and other healthcare regulators, professional bodies and voluntary organisations and charities.”

Source location

2019-0396-Response-by-NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

MHRA is better placed to respond to risks involving petroleum-based emollients and skin creams because they are medicines.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have reviewed the report and Public Health England have no comments to add as the report refers to the risks of petroleum-based emollients/skin creams which have been implicated in fire deaths prescribed to the elderly, as they act as an additional fuel.”

Source location

2019-0396-Response-by-Public-Health-England
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Convene a stakeholder group involving fire services, healthcare professionals, patient representatives and relevant guidance organisations.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Convene a stakeholder group involving fire services, healthcare professionals, patient representatives and relevant guidance organisations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following that review, the MHRA has convened a stakeholder group that includes representatives from the fire service, healthcare professionals and their representative”

Source location

2019-0396-Response-by-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/6

Data last updated 7 September 2026