Investigation and inquest
On14th May 2014 I commenced an investigation into the death of Mary Fenton dob 13th September 1931. The investigation concluded on the 8th October 2014 and the conclusion was one of Natural Causes. The medical cause of death was (1a) Coronary Artery Atheroma (b) Acute Cerebral Infarction.
Circumstances of the death
On the 26th April 2014 she was admitted into Tameside Hospital as being in need of an urgent heart pacemaker. Various delays then occurred and opportunities were missed and she died on the 30th April 2014.
Coroner’s concerns
1. Although Tameside Hospital holds itself out as performing pacemaker insertions, both temporary and permanent, no Cardiology Consultant is on call after 5.00pm or at week-ends. There is therefore no-one available to the junior staff having the requisite levels of skill and expertise to advise. (For Tameside Hospital)
2. After 5.00pm there is no facility for an echocardiogram to be performed at the hospital. (For Tameside Hospital)
3. This patient was being kept alive by the use of Isoprenaline. It transpires that there were severe shortages of this drug in the hospital but also nationally. I was told that this drug is produced as an unlicensed drug by NHS Pharmaceutical Productions. If so why do they not ensure sufficient supply? (For Tameside Hospital and for The Secretary of State)
4. There was a failure of the medical staff to assess and/or document the mental “capacity” of the patient (For Tameside Hospital)
5. There was a failure of the medical staff to obtain “consent” to treatment or to document why such consent was unavailable and why they were “self-consenting”. (For Tameside Hospital)
6. Despite this being a major District General Hospital providing cardiology cover for a large proportion of the population of Greater Manchester, there is no-one with the skill or qualification to fit “temporary/permanent” pacing wires. (For Tameside Hospital)
7. There were inexcusably and potentially catastrophic delays in inserting the pacing wires (For Tameside Hospital)
8. It was demonstrated by the evidence that if there should be a situation where the placing of the pacing causes unforeseen problems (e.g. by causing bleeding within the pericardium leading to cardiac tamponade) there is a lack of adequate facilities to address that situation. (For Tameside Hospital)
9. The National pharmaceutical supply chain was described in evidence by a Chief Pharmacist as being “very fragile” (For Secretary of State)
10. There was very poor communication between staff and other staff, and between staff and the family of the deceased and the patient herself (e.g. in relation to DNAR notice, “consent” forms etc.) (Tameside Hospital).