Hoshi Jane Naylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Feb 2019•West Yorkshire Eastern

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Sparse provision of facilitated pedestrian crossing points on the A6120
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks
  2. Failure of street lighting to adequately illuminate grass verges at the collision site
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate and unreliable public-road street lightingPart of recurring concern: Inadequate outdoor safety lighting

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Leeds City Council

    Widen the carriageway to construct a pedestrian refuge at the crossing location.

  2. Leeds City Council

    Install lighting in the grassed area to illuminate the pedestrian route and highlight pedestrians approaching the road.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Sparse provision of facilitated pedestrian crossing points on the A6120

Wider context from the report

“(1) The point at which Hoshi started to cross the road is approximately opposite a bus stop and a shop which she was intending to visit to buy packed lunch provisions for a school trip the following day. It is a point where pedestrians can reasonably be anticipated to cross the road to and from the bus stop and the shop. (2) The nearest pedestrian refuge island to the scene of the collision is approximately 500 metres away from it, in an eastbound direction. (3) The nearest traffic signal controlled pedestrian crossing to the scene of the collision is approximately 940 metres away from it, in an eastbound direction. (4) In the opinion of a Forensic Collision Investigator called as an expert witness to the Inquest, the provision of facilitated pedestrian crossing points on this stretch of the A6120 (whether facilitated by refuge islands or pedestrian crossings) is sparse in comparison to such provision on similar stretches of the A6120 elsewhere along its length. (5) The street lighting at the collision site appears to offer little illumination of the grass verges to either side of the road. In dark conditions, motorists' awareness of pedestrians intending to cross the road is likely to be restricted. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of street lighting to adequately illuminate grass verges at the collision site

Wider context from the report

“(1) The point at which Hoshi started to cross the road is approximately opposite a bus stop and a shop which she was intending to visit to buy packed lunch provisions for a school trip the following day. It is a point where pedestrians can reasonably be anticipated to cross the road to and from the bus stop and the shop. (2) The nearest pedestrian refuge island to the scene of the collision is approximately 500 metres away from it, in an eastbound direction. (3) The nearest traffic signal controlled pedestrian crossing to the scene of the collision is approximately 940 metres away from it, in an eastbound direction. (4) In the opinion of a Forensic Collision Investigator called as an expert witness to the Inquest, the provision of facilitated pedestrian crossing points on this stretch of the A6120 (whether facilitated by refuge islands or pedestrian crossings) is sparse in comparison to such provision on similar stretches of the A6120 elsewhere along its length. (5) The street lighting at the collision site appears to offer little illumination of the grass verges to either side of the road. In dark conditions, motorists' awareness of pedestrians intending to cross the road is likely to be restricted. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate and unreliable public-road street lighting; Inadequate outdoor safety lighting.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Widen the carriageway to construct a pedestrian refuge at the crossing location.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However given the circumstance behind the sad death of Ms Naylor and the continued desire line to the shop for the residential area to the south of the Ring Road, a scheme has been included in this year’s works program to widen the carriageway at this location to enable a pedestrian refuge to be constructed. In addition to these proposed works it is also proposed to provide lighting within the grassed area to illuminate the route and to highlight the presence of any pedestrians walking towards the road to cross.”

Source location

2019-0076-Response-by-Leeds-City-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 9 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install lighting in the grassed area to illuminate the pedestrian route and highlight pedestrians approaching the road.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However given the circumstance behind the sad death of Ms Naylor and the continued desire line to the shop for the residential area to the south of the Ring Road, a scheme has been included in this year’s works program to widen the carriageway at this location to enable a pedestrian refuge to be constructed. In addition to these proposed works it is also proposed to provide lighting within the grassed area to illuminate the route and to highlight the presence of any pedestrians walking towards the road to cross.”

Source location

2019-0076-Response-by-Leeds-City-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 9 June 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026