PFD report

Raymond Horace Watkins · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Jun 2024•Manchester North

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of Time Critical Medicine guidance for the community setting
  2. Failure to ensure receipt of correct medicine authorisations by District Nurses
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Responsibility for addressing community prescribing and time-critical medicines guidance rests with NHS England.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of Time Critical Medicine guidance for the community setting

Wider context from the report

“1. During the course of the evidence the court heard that receipt of correct authorisations in respect of medicines is an issue faced by District Nurses in many areas of the country. Currently there is no “Time Critical Medicine” guidance for the community setting. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure receipt of correct medicine authorisations by District Nurses

Wider context from the report

“1. During the course of the evidence the court heard that receipt of correct authorisations in respect of medicines is an issue faced by District Nurses in many areas of the country. Currently there is no “Time Critical Medicine” guidance for the community setting. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for addressing community prescribing and time-critical medicines guidance rests with NHS England.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• During the course of the evidence the court heard that receipt of correct authorisations in respect of medicines is an issue faced by District Nurses in many areas of the country. Currently there is no “Time Critical Medicine” guidance for the community setting.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 1 · response
Published 4 July 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026