Thomas Edward Curtin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Mar 2018•Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of a national framework governing private providers’ response times to referrals for locked rehabilitation units
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable mental health referral pathways

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. NHS England

    Require NHS England-commissioned specialist mental health providers, public and private, to respond to referrals within specified timeframes through standardised contracts.

  2. NHS England

    Scope and cost a national specialist mental health rehabilitation programme with ALBs, building on local acute-system demand and capacity work.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. NHS England

    For specialist rehabilitation services commissioned by Clinical Commissioning Groups, referral response-time requirements are determined locally by the relevant commissioning CCG.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. NHS England

    Standardised NHS England contracts already require both public and private commissioned providers to respond to secondary mental health referrals within set timeframes.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a national framework governing private providers’ response times to referrals for locked rehabilitation units

Wider context from the report

“At the hearing witnesses from the treating Mental Health Trust advised the court that Mr Curtin was identified as requiring a placement on a locked rehabilitation ward to treat the chronic nature of his illness namely of schizophrenia, with ADHD with harmful misuse of alcohol and drugs and psychoactive substances and to prevent relapse. The majority of such facilities are provided by the private sector. Evidence at inquest revealed that public entities of low and medium security facilities were subject to a National NHS England framework concerning the timing of their response to referrals for specialist units. The evidence at inquest was that private providers of “Locked Rehabilitation Units” were not subject to such a National NHS England framework. This may lead to the risk of future deaths as patients are left on a ward which is inappropriate for their needs while awaiting the private provider’s response to a referral. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable mental health referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require NHS England-commissioned specialist mental health providers, public and private, to respond to referrals within specified timeframes through standardised contracts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the inquest, you raised a concern in your Report to NHS England regarding the requirement for specialist mental health providers to respond to referrals within a given timeframe. Evidence presented at the inquest suggested that this requirement only applies to public providers of low and medium security facilities and not to private providers of ‘Locked Rehabilitation Units’.”

Source location

2018-0076-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 1 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Scope and cost a national specialist mental health rehabilitation programme with ALBs, building on local acute-system demand and capacity work.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to the report’s findings and recommendations, NHS England is working with the relevant Arm’s-length bodies (“ALBs”) to scope and cost a programme of work focused on specialist mental health rehabilitation. It is likely that this will aim to improve national-level understanding of current CCG commissioned rehabilitation services and support local areas to plan and commission the rehabilitation pathway more effectively in future in order to better manage demand and avoid lengthy waits for individuals who need the level of care, treatment and support that an inpatient rehabilitation unit can provide.”

Source location

2018-0076-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 2 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

For specialist rehabilitation services commissioned by Clinical Commissioning Groups, referral response-time requirements are determined locally by the relevant commissioning CCG.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Some specialist mental health services, including specialist mental health rehabilitation services, are the commissioning responsibility of local Clinical Commissioning Groups (“CCG”) and therefore are not subject to similar national frameworks requiring set response times. This enables services to be commissioned in response to local population need, local priorities and plans. As such, the contractual requirement to respond to referrals within a given time would be determined by the commissioning CCG and therefore subject to local variation.”

Source location

2018-0076-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 1 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Standardised NHS England contracts already require both public and private commissioned providers to respond to secondary mental health referrals within set timeframes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the inquest, you raised a concern in your Report to NHS England regarding the requirement for specialist mental health providers to respond to referrals within a given timeframe. Evidence presented at the inquest suggested that this requirement only applies to public providers of low and medium security facilities and not to private providers of ‘Locked Rehabilitation Units’.”

Source location

2018-0076-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 1 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026