PFD report

Alice Olivia CLARK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Oct 2024•North West Kent

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of regular time-bound review of driving standards
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably assess driver fitness and driving safety
  2. Lack of a formal complaint procedure for recording, investigating and communicating outcomes
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable handling of safety-related complaints
  3. Lack of independent assessment of driving standards
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably assess driver fitness and driving safety
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Run a weekly multidisciplinary Driving Standards Review Panel to assess concerns, determine outcomes and monitor repeated concerns.

    Stated by South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 December 2024.
  2. Action

    Use a documented complaint procedure requiring recorded meetings, investigation updates, outcomes and manager referral through a standard flow chart.

    Stated by South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 December 2024.
  3. Action

    Maintain five-yearly response-driver reassessments, annual theory training and return-to-work driving assessments before resuming full driving duties.

    Stated by South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 December 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    A documented driving-concerns mechanism exists, so the premise that no formal complaint procedure is in place is disputed.

    Stated by South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of regular time-bound review of driving standards

Wider context from the report

“(3) Driving standards are assessed by 'drive outs' with managers - should this be carried out by independent assessors and completed within a set time i.e. every 6 months or equally cctv reviewed on a regular basis of driving standards. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably assess driver fitness and driving safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a formal complaint procedure for recording, investigating and communicating outcomes

Wider context from the report

“(2) No formal complaint procedure in place. I am concerned by the evidence that a paramedic raises a complaint with their supervisor and there are no written notes/statement taken and the paramedic is not updated regarding the investigation/outcome. I am concerned that without a set complaint procedure in place with statement taking, interviews and time limits lives could be at risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable handling of safety-related complaints.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of independent assessment of driving standards

Wider context from the report

“(3) Driving standards are assessed by 'drive outs' with managers - should this be carried out by independent assessors and completed within a set time i.e. every 6 months or equally cctv reviewed on a regular basis of driving standards. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably assess driver fitness and driving safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to appropriately deal with complaints about unsafe driving standards

Wider context from the report

“(1) Complaints had been received by other paramedic passengers as to the unsafe driving standards of ████████ and these were not dealt with appropriately. I am concerned that this could occur in the future and put lives at risk ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable handling of safety-related complaints.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Run a weekly multidisciplinary Driving Standards Review Panel to assess concerns, determine outcomes and monitor repeated concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In March 2023 a new weekly Driving Standards Review Panel was formed. This comprises supervisors from Operations, Risk, Security, Patient Safety, Driving Standards and Professional Standards. Any driving concern that has been raised and progressed through to Driving Standards is discussed, an outcome which can range from words of advice, through to face-to-face meeting and follow up Driver Training, to formal HR procedures; a concern could also be referred to the Police.”

Source location

Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service
Page 1 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use a documented complaint procedure requiring recorded meetings, investigation updates, outcomes and manager referral through a standard flow chart.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As described above, the new Driving Standards Policy includes a documented mechanism for concerns to be raised. Driving Standards will speak to the complainant direct with appropriate support from line manager/union colleagues if they wish. Notes are now taken of meetings in response to such concerns, which form part of an investigation and presentation to the Driving Standards Review Panel. This will support other evidence such as CCTV and telematics. The complainant is now kept up to date with the investigation and will be given an outcome. A flow chart has been created by Driving Standards for Managers to follow to ensure any complaints are forwarded to Driving Standards for investigation. This flow chart will form part of the upcoming scene management training for all Operational Supervisors starting in February 2025.”

Source location

Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service
Page 2 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain five-yearly response-driver reassessments, annual theory training and return-to-work driving assessments before resuming full driving duties.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, Section 19 of the Road Traffic Act 2008 is well embedded into the Trust and has been for more than three years. This requires every response driver to be reassessed within every 5 years. In addition, there is yearly theory learning via our Key Skills course, which is mandatory training for all drivers. If any driver has been out of the Trust for any reason such as maternity or long-term sickness, they are given a driving assessment with a fully qualified Driving Instructor from the Driving Team on their return to work and they are asked to complete the online modular training before returning to full driving duties.”

Source location

Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service
Page 3 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A documented driving-concerns mechanism exists, so the premise that no formal complaint procedure is in place is disputed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. No formal complaint procedure in place. I am concerned by the evidence that a paramedic raises a complaint with their supervisor and there are no written notes/statement taken and the paramedic is not updated regarding the investigation/outcome. I am concerned that without a set complaint procedure in place with statement taking, interviews and time limits lives could be at risk.”

Source location

Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service
Page 2 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Qualified assessments, five-year reassessment, annual training and incident-triggered CCTV reviews are considered sufficient instead of independent six-monthly assessments or regular CCTV review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Official driving assessments are carried out by a fully qualified driving instructor inline with Section 19 criteria and follow the standard objectives from qualifications taught by the awarding body (Futurequals). The assessments are bespoke training to the individual’s needs and are carried out by the Driver Training team only. Any reviews from the Driving Standards Review Panel are now carried out by dedicated, qualified Driving Instructor from the SECAmb Driving Team who works directly with the Review Panel to ensure any referrals are completed in a standardised and timely manner. A written report is then forwarded to the local supervisor as well as to Driving Standards. A ‘drive out’ with a local supervisor may be part of an outcome in an informal manner as a wider supporting mechanism.”

Source location

Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service
Page 3 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Formal complaint response timescales are not set because they depend on the nature of the response required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Formal timescales for response are not set as these depend on the nature of the response required. However, Driving Standards will pick up an investigation as soon as it is raised and as there is a weekly meeting of the Panel the response will be timely. As soon as evidence is gained, it will be taken to the next weekly review panel and an outcome/advice forwarded that same afternoon to the relevant people.”

Source location

Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service
Page 2 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. 1

    Provide qualified instructor assessments, including standardised reviews of referrals made by the Driving Standards Review Panel.

    Stated by South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 December 2024.
  2. 2

    Deliver scene management training for Operational Supervisors covering complaint routing, repeated driving concerns and the new reporting process.

    Stated by South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 18 December 2024.
  3. 3

    Launch a Trust-wide Speak Up Driving Standards campaign using a QR code and online reporting form.

    Stated by South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 18 December 2024.
  4. 4

    Teach emergency driving staff to recognise and report peer driving concerns through CERAD and annual Key Skills human factors training.

    Stated by South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 December 2024.
  5. 5

    Request and review CCTV after road traffic collisions or driving concerns, using suitable footage for panel review, feedback and non-identifiable Trust-wide learning.

    Stated by South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 December 2024.
  6. 6

    Operate a confidential and anonymous reporting route that sends driving concerns to Driving Standards for investigation and records linked reports.

    Stated by South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 December 2024.
  7. 7

    Publish a driving policy with appendices explaining how staff can speak up about colleagues’ driving concerns.

    Stated by South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 December 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide qualified instructor assessments, including standardised reviews of referrals made by the Driving Standards Review Panel.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Official driving assessments are carried out by a fully qualified driving instructor inline with Section 19 criteria and follow the standard objectives from qualifications taught by the awarding body (Futurequals). The assessments are bespoke training to the individual’s needs and are carried out by the Driver Training team only. Any reviews from the Driving Standards Review Panel are now carried out by dedicated, qualified Driving Instructor from the SECAmb Driving Team who works directly with the Review Panel to ensure any referrals are completed in a standardised and timely manner. A written report is then forwarded to the local supervisor as well as to Driving Standards. A ‘drive out’ with a local supervisor may be part of an outcome in an informal manner as a wider supporting mechanism.”

Source location

Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service
Page 3 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver scene management training for Operational Supervisors covering complaint routing, repeated driving concerns and the new reporting process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Any concern can be raised confidentially and will be treated appropriately by Driving Standards, who will maintain a spreadsheet from the Speak Up campaign which will allow us to tie up more than one report and treat them as a bigger picture, using the information supplied on the MS form. Staff will be able to report anonymously but will need to provide some basic information to allow Driving Standards to investigate the complaint – such as date, time, location etc to allow cctv/telematics to be viewed. This new process will form part of scene management training for all Operational Supervisors commencing in February 2025, run by Driving Standards to include how to handle repeated concerns about an individual’s driving and the Driving Standards Review Panel will actively monitor for repeated concerns.”

Source location

Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service
Page 2 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Launch a Trust-wide Speak Up Driving Standards campaign using a QR code and online reporting form.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We strongly support the need to ensure colleagues are encouraged to raise any concerns they have, and that they feel comfortable in doing so. Our new driving policy which was published in August 2023 contains three new Appendices on Speaking Up and how to raise any concerns about colleagues’ driving (please see below). A stand-alone Speak Up Driving Standards campaign is due to be launched across the Trust in January 2025 (awaiting a final approval of a minor amendment to the policy). A QR code has been set up which links directly to a Microsoft form (easily accessible) which in turn will be sent direct to Driving Standards who will investigate all submissions. These are investigated promptly in liaison with the relevant departments such as Driving Standards/Driver Training/HR/Professional Standards.”

Source location

Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service
Page 1 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Teach emergency driving staff to recognise and report peer driving concerns through CERAD and annual Key Skills human factors training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Every student who attends the Driver Training Unit for their initial emergency response (CERAD) course is taught how to report driving standards concerns and to recognise poor driving with their peers. This is covered within a Human Factors training session. A human factors/confrontational session for all emergency driving staff is also now included in their yearly Key Skills training days.”

Source location

Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service
Page 2 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request and review CCTV after road traffic collisions or driving concerns, using suitable footage for panel review, feedback and non-identifiable Trust-wide learning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following an RTC or driving behaviour concern, line managers and/or driving standards will request CCTV. This is then viewed and if appropriate (for learning and education) is presented at the next Driving Standards Review Panel. An outcome will often be for the driver to have a face-to-face meeting with Driving Standards and as part of the learning, the CCTV is viewed together and discussed. This meeting can include the TU representative and line manager as applicable. The driver is regularly asked if they are happy that driving standards use the CCTV clip for Trustwide learning and for driver training (in a non-identifiable way) to encourage an open culture of improvement.”

Source location

Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service
Page 3 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a confidential and anonymous reporting route that sends driving concerns to Driving Standards for investigation and records linked reports.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We strongly support the need to ensure colleagues are encouraged to raise any concerns they have, and that they feel comfortable in doing so. Our new driving policy which was published in August 2023 contains three new Appendices on Speaking Up and how to raise any concerns about colleagues’ driving (please see below). A stand-alone Speak Up Driving Standards campaign is due to be launched across the Trust in January 2025 (awaiting a final approval of a minor amendment to the policy). A QR code has been set up which links directly to a Microsoft form (easily accessible) which in turn will be sent direct to Driving Standards who will investigate all submissions. These are investigated promptly in liaison with the relevant departments such as Driving Standards/Driver Training/HR/Professional Standards.”

Source location

Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service
Page 1 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish a driving policy with appendices explaining how staff can speak up about colleagues’ driving concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We strongly support the need to ensure colleagues are encouraged to raise any concerns they have, and that they feel comfortable in doing so. Our new driving policy which was published in August 2023 contains three new Appendices on Speaking Up and how to raise any concerns about colleagues’ driving (please see below). A stand-alone Speak Up Driving Standards campaign is due to be launched across the Trust in January 2025 (awaiting a final approval of a minor amendment to the policy). A QR code has been set up which links directly to a Microsoft form (easily accessible) which in turn will be sent direct to Driving Standards who will investigate all submissions. These are investigated promptly in liaison with the relevant departments such as Driving Standards/Driver Training/HR/Professional Standards.”

Source location

Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service
Page 1 · response
Published 18 December 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026