Arnold SOULSBY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 May 2014•Black Country

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to apply forward-facing mirror requirements retrospectively to lorries
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate front-obstruction visibility controls for large vehicles

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Department for Transport

    Prepare a consultation on retrofitting forward-facing Class VI mirrors to older heavy goods vehicles, assessing benefits, costs and engineering issues.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to apply forward-facing mirror requirements retrospectively to lorries

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that the regulations that have been introduced requiring lorries to have forward facing mirrors are not retrospective, hence there are a large number of lorries on the road which do not have this facility. I have conducted a number of inquests where the circumstances are similar and I have previously drawn the attention of the department to this problem on (I believe) two occasions, one prior to the 2007 Regulations providing for forward facing mirrors and one thereafter. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate front-obstruction visibility controls for large vehicles.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prepare a consultation on retrofitting forward-facing Class VI mirrors to older heavy goods vehicles, assessing benefits, costs and engineering issues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Driver vision is an important factor in minimising collisions of large vehicles with vulnerable road users and I have recently asked officials to prepare a consultation which is specifically about retro-fitting forward facing (Class VI) mirrors above the windscreen of heavy goods vehicles that were first registered prior to 26 January 2007. These mirrors were required as standard fitment on heavy goods vehicles first used after that date.”

Source location

2014-0241-Response-by-Department-of-Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 28 May 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026