PFD report

Mrs Patricia Irene Walker · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Jan 2026•East Riding and Hull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to maintain adequate staffing for TAG nursing care
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Operate daily site staffing meetings and twice-daily Trust-wide safe staffing reviews to identify staffing risks and redistribute workforce to priority areas.

    Stated by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 January 2026.
  2. Action

    Implement the approved safer-staffing investment in phases, prioritising red-rated areas and aligning recruitment with affordability planning.

    Stated by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 January 2026.
  3. Action

    Approve nursing establishment investment for priority red-rated areas, including the recommended Ward 90 healthcare-assistant uplift.

    Stated by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 January 2026.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The staffing and TAG nursing concerns fall outside NHS England’s usual role and remit.

    Stated by NHS EnglandOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain adequate staffing for TAG nursing care

Wider context from the report

“(1) Staffing was sub optimal and remain sub optimal on Ward 90 as recruitment is difficult which means that TAG nursing care is not always possible, and patients are at an increased risk of falls. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate daily site staffing meetings and twice-daily Trust-wide safe staffing reviews to identify staffing risks and redistribute workforce to priority areas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has established daily operational controls to mitigate staffing pressures in real time. Daily staffing meetings take place across all sites, where ward-level escalations relating to actual versus planned staffing, changes in acuity, and red flag indicators are reviewed by dedicated staffing representatives. These representatives cover all Trust sites, providing a consistent view of risk and enabling rapid redistribution of workforce to the highest priority areas.”

Source location

2026-0044 - Response from Hull University Teaching Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 29 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the approved safer-staffing investment in phases, prioritising red-rated areas and aligning recruitment with affordability planning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While the Trust’s actions are Trust-wide and intended to improve safety across multiple wards/services, the approved investment recommendations do include Ward 90, which is identified as SNCT Red with a recommended uplift the number of Health Care Assistant 12 hours per day.).”

Source location

2026-0044 - Response from Hull University Teaching Hospital
Page 3 · response
Published 29 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Approve nursing establishment investment for priority red-rated areas, including the recommended Ward 90 healthcare-assistant uplift.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• that funding the “red” areas would require investment, equating to 123.82 WTE, and that this is intended to support safer care delivery and reduce premium “bad cost” spend by moving to substantive recruitment where possible.”

Source location

2026-0044 - Response from Hull University Teaching Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 29 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a safer staffing establishment review using recognised staffing tools and triangulation with patient outcomes to identify staffing gaps and prioritise investment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the above, as part of a wider programme to strengthen safe staffing and reduce reliance on temporary mitigation, the Trust (as part of Humber Health Partnership) has undertaken a comprehensive safer staffing establishment review using recognised safer staffing tools (including the Safer Nursing Care Tool census approach) and triangulation with patient outcomes.”

Source location

2026-0044 - Response from Hull University Teaching Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 29 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide 24/7 site-matron oversight of staffing escalations, including authorising redeployment, temporary staffing and enhanced-care arrangements outside core hours.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Out of hours, staffing escalations are directed to site matrons who provide senior clinical leadership 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and who review and authorise redeployment, temporary staffing requests and enhanced care arrangements during evenings, nights and weekends, ensuring continuous oversight and rapid response to any deterioration in staffing levels or patient acuity outside core hours.”

Source location

2026-0044 - Response from Hull University Teaching Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 29 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The staffing and TAG nursing concerns fall outside NHS England’s usual role and remit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We note that your Report has also been sent to Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, who would be best placed to respond to your concerns from a local perspective. NHS England has endeavoured to address your concerns as far as we are able to, but consider the issues in this case to fall outside of our usual role and remit.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 29 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust is responsible for its own recruitment and should address related queries.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS provider organisations have a statutory duty to ensure that services are staffed safely and appropriately to meet the clinical needs of patients. Each Trust or NHS organisation is responsible for its own recruitment and therefore any future queries in this regard will be best addressed by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 29 January 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Discuss received reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share patient-safety learning across NHS national and regional services.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 January 2026.
  2. 2

    Report to the Workforce, Education and Culture Committees on managing staffing investment, redeployment expectations and reducing and monitoring bank and agency use.

    Stated by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 January 2026.
  3. 3

    Provide six-monthly safer-staffing reports with peer benchmarking and outcome KPIs, with the next report scheduled for April 2026.

    Stated by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 January 2026.
  4. 4

    Assess every security-bed-watch patient daily by a specialist registered nurse and support clinical areas to provide appropriate enhanced observation.

    Stated by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 January 2026.
  5. 5

    Monitor staffing and quality measures, temporary staffing use, fill rates, falls and incident learning to assess the impact of staffing actions.

    Stated by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 January 2026.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss received reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share patient-safety learning across NHS national and regional services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Patricia, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 29 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Report to the Workforce, Education and Culture Committees on managing staffing investment, redeployment expectations and reducing and monitoring bank and agency use.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Executive Team will report to the Workforce, Education & Culture Committees-in-Common on how the staffing investment will be managed, including expectations around redeployment and the planned reduction and ongoing monitoring of bank and agency usage.”

Source location

2026-0044 - Response from Hull University Teaching Hospital
Page 3 · response
Published 29 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide six-monthly safer-staffing reports with peer benchmarking and outcome KPIs, with the next report scheduled for April 2026.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Boards have also agreed strengthened governance and reporting arrangements, including receipt of a safer staffing paper every six months, with the next report scheduled for April 2026. Future reports will include benchmarking against peers and KPIs to evidence the outcomes and benefits of the approved investment, including a baseline position and expected improvements following implementation.”

Source location

2026-0044 - Response from Hull University Teaching Hospital
Page 3 · response
Published 29 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess every security-bed-watch patient daily by a specialist registered nurse and support clinical areas to provide appropriate enhanced observation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Reducing inappropriate 1:1 mitigations: the paper notes use of security bed watch staff for patients requiring one-to-one supervision, acknowledging this can be inappropriate and linked to reduced non-registered nursing capacity; the intention of investing in the non-registered workforce is to reduce reliance on this mitigation and improve patient experience.”

Source location

2026-0044 - Response from Hull University Teaching Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 29 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor staffing and quality measures, temporary staffing use, fill rates, falls and incident learning to assess the impact of staffing actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust will monitor the impact of these actions through staffing and quality measures, triangulated with patient outcomes and incident learning, including temporary staffing usage, staffing fill rates, and patient safety indicators such as falls (including falls with harm), particularly across frailty wards.”

Source location

2026-0044 - Response from Hull University Teaching Hospital
Page 3 · response
Published 29 January 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026