PFD report

Sean Higgins · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 Mar 2025•Mid Kent and Medway

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to review relevant ongoing records and case notes before risk reviews
  2. Failure to ensure support plans are started or completed before ACCT closure
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Conduct briefing sessions for all ACCT case coordinators on reviewing documentation, assessing risk, and implementing meaningful support plans before ACCT closure.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 March 2025.
  2. Action

    Produce and share training covering accurate risk assessment and support-plan quality with ACCT case coordinators and line managers.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 March 2025.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review relevant ongoing records and case notes before risk reviews

Wider context from the report

“(1) Although HMP Rochester had addressed many of the concerns raised by the PPO in advance of the inquest, evidence was given at the inquest that some officers chairing reviews did not read relevant documentation beyond the last ACCT review prior to the review taking place. Although they additionally looked at the last CSIP review where the processes were running in tandem, they did not read the ongoing record or Nomis case notes and were unable to conduct an accurate assessment of risk as a result ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure support plans are started or completed before ACCT closure

Wider context from the report

“(2) Some of the officers chairing reviews did not understand how to complete the support plan paperwork such that the ACCT was closed when some of the support plans had not started or had not been completed ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct briefing sessions for all ACCT case coordinators on reviewing documentation, assessing risk, and implementing meaningful support plans before ACCT closure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To further embed understanding of existing procedures, HMP Rochester’s Safety Team has conducted briefing sessions with all case coordinators, specifically focused on the concerns raised at the inquest. These sessions have been designed to reinforce the importance of thoroughly reviewing all relevant documentation, including ongoing case notes when assessing risk. They have also emphasised the need to create meaningful support plans that are actioned and fully implemented before initiating the closure of the ACCT.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Produce and share training covering accurate risk assessment and support-plan quality with ACCT case coordinators and line managers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Governor of HMP Rochester has provided assurances that these issues have been addressed, and the establishment have produced a training video covering both areas of concern. This has been shared with case coordinators and their line managers and is intended to ensure there is a clear understanding of the process among those responsible for conducting ACCT reviews and developing support plans.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 1 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026