PFD report

Ricky James MONAHAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Oct 2025•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
4

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
12

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Unprotected fire escapes providing easy access to roofs in rehabilitation settings
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to prevent unsafe access to elevated roofsPart of recurring concern: Inadequate safety controls for accessible elevated areas in residential and rehabilitation accommodation
  2. Lack of environmental risk assessment of fire escape and roof accessibility
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to prevent unsafe access to elevated roofsPart of recurring concern: Inadequate safety controls for accessible elevated areas in residential and rehabilitation accommodation
  3. Lack of guidelines specifying required fire escape protections in rehabilitation settings
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate clarity of fire-safety standards and guidance
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Signpost registered providers to fire-safety and environmental-premises guidance through the CQC website.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 October 2025.
  2. Action

    Request environmental risk assessments and observe ward environments during inspections to assess premises safety.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 October 2025.
  3. Action

    Scope revisions to HTM 05-02 fire-safety guidance for healthcare-premises design.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 October 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.6

  1. Position

    National or local guidance on fire-escape protections is outside the regulatory scope and cannot be directly addressed.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unprotected fire escapes providing easy access to roofs in rehabilitation settings

Wider context from the report

“1. Mr Monahan was in a 10 bedded rehabilitation unit and was detained under S37 of the Mental Health Act. There was an unprotected fire escape at the rear of the building which could be easily accessed from the garden which in turn gave easy access to the roof. No environmental risk assessment had been completed regarding how accessible the fire escape was and how it easily provided access to the roof due to inadequate railings at the top of the staircase. The trust relied on individual risk assessments when considering what controls were required for individual patients when accessing the garden. 2. The inquest heard how there are no current guidelines setting out what protections are required for fire escapes in rehabilitation settings. The lack of any guidelines presents a risk of future deaths and in my view, action should be taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to prevent unsafe access to elevated roofs; Inadequate safety controls for accessible elevated areas in residential and rehabilitation accommodation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of environmental risk assessment of fire escape and roof accessibility

Wider context from the report

“1. Mr Monahan was in a 10 bedded rehabilitation unit and was detained under S37 of the Mental Health Act. There was an unprotected fire escape at the rear of the building which could be easily accessed from the garden which in turn gave easy access to the roof. No environmental risk assessment had been completed regarding how accessible the fire escape was and how it easily provided access to the roof due to inadequate railings at the top of the staircase. The trust relied on individual risk assessments when considering what controls were required for individual patients when accessing the garden. 2. The inquest heard how there are no current guidelines setting out what protections are required for fire escapes in rehabilitation settings. The lack of any guidelines presents a risk of future deaths and in my view, action should be taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to prevent unsafe access to elevated roofs; Inadequate safety controls for accessible elevated areas in residential and rehabilitation accommodation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of guidelines specifying required fire escape protections in rehabilitation settings

Wider context from the report

“1. Mr Monahan was in a 10 bedded rehabilitation unit and was detained under S37 of the Mental Health Act. There was an unprotected fire escape at the rear of the building which could be easily accessed from the garden which in turn gave easy access to the roof. No environmental risk assessment had been completed regarding how accessible the fire escape was and how it easily provided access to the roof due to inadequate railings at the top of the staircase. The trust relied on individual risk assessments when considering what controls were required for individual patients when accessing the garden. 2. The inquest heard how there are no current guidelines setting out what protections are required for fire escapes in rehabilitation settings. The lack of any guidelines presents a risk of future deaths and in my view, action should be taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate clarity of fire-safety standards and guidance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reliance on individual patient risk assessments instead of environmental access controls

Wider context from the report

“1. Mr Monahan was in a 10 bedded rehabilitation unit and was detained under S37 of the Mental Health Act. There was an unprotected fire escape at the rear of the building which could be easily accessed from the garden which in turn gave easy access to the roof. No environmental risk assessment had been completed regarding how accessible the fire escape was and how it easily provided access to the roof due to inadequate railings at the top of the staircase. The trust relied on individual risk assessments when considering what controls were required for individual patients when accessing the garden. 2. The inquest heard how there are no current guidelines setting out what protections are required for fire escapes in rehabilitation settings. The lack of any guidelines presents a risk of future deaths and in my view, action should be taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Signpost registered providers to fire-safety and environmental-premises guidance through the CQC website.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your concerns relate specifically to the availability of national or local guidance. We are unable to comment directly on this point due to it being outside the remit of our regulatory scope. We are currently not aware of guidelines regarding fire escapes specifically in rehabilitation settings. However, the CQC signposts registered providers to information regarding fire safety and the environmental safety of their premises on our website.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request environmental risk assessments and observe ward environments during inspections to assess premises safety.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of our inspection process, CQC will routinely ask for the most recent environmental risk assessment to provide assurance that providers have made the premises safe for people who use the service. CQC inspectors will also observe the ward environment as part of an inspection. In our inspection in October 2023, CQC found that there were risk assessments in place in all ward areas which removed or reduced any risks they identified. The report in October 2023 does not make specific reference to the external fire escape.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Scope revisions to HTM 05-02 fire-safety guidance for healthcare-premises design.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England’s Estates Team are currently scoping HTM 05-02, fire safety in the design of healthcare premises, which will be revised imminently.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish national best-practice guidance promoting person-centred safety assessment, formulation, management and environmental safety planning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England also published the Staying Safe from Suicide: Best Practice Guidance for Safety Assessment, Formulation and Management on 4 April 2025. It promotes a shift towards a more holistic, person-centred approach rather than relying on risk prediction, which can be unreliable because suicidal thoughts can change quickly. Instead, it recommends using a method based on understanding each person’s situation and managing their safety. The purpose of this guidance is to enable mental health practitioners to adopt best practice principles in working with people of all ages to stay safe from suicide. The guidance highlights environmental safety as one of six steps of safety planning, which should include reducing access to or avoiding high risk locations.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Liaise with Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust about environmental risk assessment and unauthorised roof access from the fire escape.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England’s regional mental health team has liaised with the Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT) regarding your concerns, including the lack of environmental risk assessment of the fire escape, and particularly its ability to allow unauthorised access to the roof.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Escalate and monitor the development of national guidance on fire-escape protections in rehabilitation settings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The inquest also heard how there are no current guidelines setting out what protections are required for fire escapes in rehabilitation settings. The lack of any guidelines presents a risk of future deaths and therefore action should be taken.”

Source location

Response from Birmingham and Solihull NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

National or local guidance on fire-escape protections is outside the regulatory scope and cannot be directly addressed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your concerns relate specifically to the availability of national or local guidance. We are unable to comment directly on this point due to it being outside the remit of our regulatory scope. We are currently not aware of guidelines regarding fire escapes specifically in rehabilitation settings. However, the CQC signposts registered providers to information regarding fire safety and the environmental safety of their premises on our website.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Specific environmental risk assessments are not required; providers must instead take reasonable steps to manage health and safety risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We do not specify that all providers must carry out specific environmental risk assessments, however providers must make sure that the premises and any equipment used is safe and where applicable, available in sufficient quantities. CQC understands that there may be inherent risks in carrying out care and treatment, and we will not consider it to be unsafe if providers can demonstrate that they have taken all reasonable steps to ensure the health and safety of people using their services and to manage risks that may arise during care and treatment.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing guidance and provider risk-assessment arrangements are considered appropriate to manage fire-escape and roof-access risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst none of the documents mentioned above specifically refer to fire escapes, secure access to fire escapes should be embedded within the provider’s risk assessments. The clinical risk assessment should cover the patient’s current level of risk (absconding, self-harm etc) and the patient should be supervised according to the level of risk posed.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 4 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Further comment on the specific local risk assessment cannot be provided.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Ultimately, there appears to be appropriate guidance in place to ensure that incidents such as this should not happen, however it appears that the local risk assessment did not take the specific risks of the fire escape and access to the roof into account. NHS England is not able to comment further on this and directs the Coroner to the Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care Service in this regard.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 4 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care Service is responsible for addressing the local fire-escape risk assessment in greater detail.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I note that your Report is also addressed to the Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care Service, who will be able to address the position locally in more detail.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS England is responsible for developing national guidance on fire escape protections in rehabilitation settings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have carefully considered this issue and feel that NHS England are most appropriately placed to provide a response. While the development of such guidance sits with NHS England, the ICB will take proactive steps to escalate and monitor this issue.”

Source location

Response from Birmingham and Solihull NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. 1

    Discuss Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share resulting learning across national and regional NHS services.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 October 2025.
  2. 2

    Revise the NHS Premises Assurance Model from an assurance-based to a compliance-based approach for 2025–26.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 October 2025.
  3. 3

    Commission NCISH through the national Culture of Care programme to support personalised safety planning in NHS-commissioned inpatient services.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 October 2025.
  4. 4

    Make training on the national safety guidance available to mental health practitioners through an e-learning module.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 October 2025.
  5. 5

    Work with BSMHFT and NHS England to prevent future deaths.

    Stated by NHS Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care Board and NHS Black Country Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 October 2025.
  6. 6

    Share learning from the incident with all local mental health and rehabilitation providers by 17 December 2025.

    Stated by NHS Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care Board and NHS Black Country Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 October 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share resulting learning across national and regional NHS services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Ricky, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 4 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise the NHS Premises Assurance Model from an assurance-based to a compliance-based approach for 2025–26.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The NHS PAM is being revised for 2025-26 to move from an assurance-based approach to a compliance-based approach.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission NCISH through the national Culture of Care programme to support personalised safety planning in NHS-commissioned inpatient services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The evidence regarding assessment of the risk of harm to self has been recently updated, to indicate that the use of risk stratification tools should be avoided as it can lead to false assurances about a person’s risk. There is evidence that many people acting on suicidal or self-harm impulses may have no plans or intentions to do so even minutes beforehand. This means it is really important to develop an understanding of factors that may reduce or increase safety for the individual in future. The National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health (NCISH) has been commissioned through the NHS England national Culture of Care programme to support every provider of NHS commissioned inpatient services to move to personalised safety planning in line with evidence.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make training on the national safety guidance available to mental health practitioners through an e-learning module.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Work is also underway to make training available to all mental health practitioners to incorporate the principles of this guidance into their practice. This training was recently launched and is available via an e-learning module. This complements existing local training on suicide prevention, and a number of other national e-learning products that are already available.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with BSMHFT and NHS England to prevent future deaths.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We take the recommendations within the Regulation 28 report extremely seriously and are committed to working with BSMHFT and NHS England to prevent future deaths. Please let us know if you require any further detail or clarification.”

Source location

Response from Birmingham and Solihull NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning from the incident with all local mental health and rehabilitation providers by 17 December 2025.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Learning and System Improvement”

Source location

Response from Birmingham and Solihull NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
4/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026