PFD report

Joan Wright · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Dec 2018•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
9

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised9

  1. Poor management and documentation of medication
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable medication management in care homes
  2. Failure to prevent unauthorised access and repeated administration of Oramorph
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable medication management in care homesPart of recurring concern: Unsafe medication administration
  3. Failure of GMP call handlers to recognise safeguarding risks in opioid maladministration reports
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable safeguarding response to medication maladministration
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Deploy additional clinical pharmacists in primary care and care homes.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 December 2018.
  2. Action

    Implement the Controlled Drugs Regulations establishing tighter controls and mandatory governance arrangements for prescribing, records, custody, monitoring and accountable officers.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2018.
  3. Action

    Accelerate rollout of electronic prescribing for controlled drugs and medicines administration.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 December 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    Existing controlled-drug governance measures are considered sufficient to detect and minimise inappropriate use, although they cannot prevent every incident.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Poor management and documentation of medication

Wider context from the report

“5. The home in question has been rated as inadequate by CQC and was under regular monitoring via an action plan. It was also being visited regularly by the Local Authority Quality Support Team every 10 days or so. One of the issues previously identified was poor management/documentation of medication. Notwithstanding that, access and unauthorised repeated administration of Oramorph took place; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable medication management in care homes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to prevent unauthorised access and repeated administration of Oramorph

Wider context from the report

“5. The home in question has been rated as inadequate by CQC and was under regular monitoring via an action plan. It was also being visited regularly by the Local Authority Quality Support Team every 10 days or so. One of the issues previously identified was poor management/documentation of medication. Notwithstanding that, access and unauthorised repeated administration of Oramorph took place; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable medication management in care homes; Unsafe medication administration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of GMP call handlers to recognise safeguarding risks in opioid maladministration reports

Wider context from the report

“4. GMP’s call handler did not recognise the potential safeguarding risks of the maladministration of opioids to a vulnerable member of the community and referred the report to the local division. The local division assessor (LRO) failed to recognise the safeguarding risks and filed the report as theft. GMP have changed their policies significantly since the matter was referred to them after Mrs Wright’s death. However it was unclear about whether or not the issue had been addressed by Forces nationally. The inquest was told that the CDLO role had been brought in after the Shipman inquiry to ensure safeguarding risks were identified in relation to maladministration of drugs; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safeguarding response to medication maladministration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Significant impact from excess administration of opioids at any prescribed strength

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard that Oramorph had different classifications depending on the strength prescribed. This impacts the storage/handling arrangements. The inquest heard that opioids can have a significant impact at whatever strength they are prescribed if given in excess; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe medication administration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of local division assessors to recognise safeguarding risks in opioid maladministration reports

Wider context from the report

“4. GMP’s call handler did not recognise the potential safeguarding risks of the maladministration of opioids to a vulnerable member of the community and referred the report to the local division. The local division assessor (LRO) failed to recognise the safeguarding risks and filed the report as theft. GMP have changed their policies significantly since the matter was referred to them after Mrs Wright’s death. However it was unclear about whether or not the issue had been addressed by Forces nationally. The inquest was told that the CDLO role had been brought in after the Shipman inquiry to ensure safeguarding risks were identified in relation to maladministration of drugs; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safeguarding response to medication maladministration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain consistent classification-based storage and handling arrangements for Oramorph

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard that Oramorph had different classifications depending on the strength prescribed. This impacts the storage/handling arrangements. The inquest heard that opioids can have a significant impact at whatever strength they are prescribed if given in excess; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable Oramorph storage and handling controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a statutory definition of the required frequency of medication checks by care homes

Wider context from the report

“6. The CQC gave evidence that the legislation requires regular checks by care homes in relation to medication but there is no statutory definition of what regular means. As a result in some it is monthly in others weekly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable medication checking in care homes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the CDLO to liaise with the local police unit and discuss safeguarding implications

Wider context from the report

“3. Following the maladministration of medication to Mrs Wright, the inquest heard that the matter was reported to GMP .The CDLO investigated but did not liaise with the local police unit or discuss the safeguarding implications; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable interagency sharing of safeguarding risk information; Unreliable safeguarding response to medication maladministration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of designation of CCGs as bodies with statutory responsibility for drugs

Wider context from the report

“2. Evidence was given that because of the abolition of PCT and replacement with CCG’s there was no designation of the CCG’s as designated bodies with statutory responsibility in relation to drugs. This was an oversight but has not been corrected; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deploy additional clinical pharmacists in primary care and care homes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, as part of the Government's response to the World Health Organisation's patient safety challenge on medicines safety, we are developing a programme of work led by NHS Improvement to improve medicines safety. Work is underway to accelerate the roll-out of electronic prescribing to controlled drugs and medicines administration, and to deploy more clinical pharmacists in primary care and care homes. We have also introduced monitoring of the highest risk prescribing practice linked to hospital admissions.”

Source location

2018-0408-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 28 December 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the Controlled Drugs Regulations establishing tighter controls and mandatory governance arrangements for prescribing, records, custody, monitoring and accountable officers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You mention the Shipman Inquiry in your report. In response to the Shipman Inquiry's Fourth Report¹, there have been significant changes in the governance arrangements for the use and management of controlled drugs.”

Source location

2018-0408-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Accelerate rollout of electronic prescribing for controlled drugs and medicines administration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, as part of the Government's response to the World Health Organisation's patient safety challenge on medicines safety, we are developing a programme of work led by NHS Improvement to improve medicines safety. Work is underway to accelerate the roll-out of electronic prescribing to controlled drugs and medicines administration, and to deploy more clinical pharmacists in primary care and care homes. We have also introduced monitoring of the highest risk prescribing practice linked to hospital admissions.”

Source location

2018-0408-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 28 December 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing controlled-drug governance measures are considered sufficient to detect and minimise inappropriate use, although they cannot prevent every incident.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While no system can ever completely prevent the mismanagement or misuse of controlled drugs, we believe the measures that have been put in place mean that the inappropriate use of opioids and other controlled drugs can be detected more quickly and minimised, so that protracted poor practice is less likely to continue unchecked.”

Source location

2018-0408-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 4 · response
Published 28 December 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Concerns about police responses and national learning should be raised with the Home Secretary because Controlled Drug Liaison Officers are police employees.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your report raises concerns about the actions of Greater Manchester Police in responding to the potential safeguarding risks following the incident report of maladministration of Oramorph to Mrs Wright, and questions if learning from this incident has been shared at a national level.”

Source location

2018-0408-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 5 · response
Published 28 December 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Registered providers and managers are responsible for ensuring the proper and safe management of medicines in care homes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is the registered provider and the registered manager’s responsibility to ensure the proper and safe management of medicines and guidance is available to support them to achieve this. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has produced a national guideline on the ‘Safe use and management of controlled drugs’ (NG46)⁶, published in 2016, and a social care guideline (SC1), published in 2014, provides guidance on ‘Managing medicines in care homes’⁷. Furthermore, the CQC has clear guidance on its website on ‘Storing controlled drugs in care homes’⁸.”

Source location

2018-0408-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 4 · response
Published 28 December 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Undertake and publish the statutory post-implementation review of the 2013 Controlled Drugs Regulations before 31 March 2020.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 December 2018.
  2. 2

    Develop a programme of work to improve medicines safety in response to the World Health Organization medicines-safety challenge.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 December 2018.
  3. 3

    Introduce monitoring of the highest-risk prescribing practices linked to hospital admissions.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake and publish the statutory post-implementation review of the 2013 Controlled Drugs Regulations before 31 March 2020.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A statutory post-implementation review of the revised 2013 Regulations will be undertaken and published before 31 March 2020. I hope this information is helpful and provides assurance that the Regulations will be reviewed to ensure their continued effectiveness.”

Source location

2018-0408-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a programme of work to improve medicines safety in response to the World Health Organization medicines-safety challenge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, as part of the Government's response to the World Health Organisation's patient safety challenge on medicines safety, we are developing a programme of work led by NHS Improvement to improve medicines safety. Work is underway to accelerate the roll-out of electronic prescribing to controlled drugs and medicines administration, and to deploy more clinical pharmacists in primary care and care homes. We have also introduced monitoring of the highest risk prescribing practice linked to hospital admissions.”

Source location

2018-0408-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 28 December 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce monitoring of the highest-risk prescribing practices linked to hospital admissions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, as part of the Government's response to the World Health Organisation's patient safety challenge on medicines safety, we are developing a programme of work led by NHS Improvement to improve medicines safety. Work is underway to accelerate the roll-out of electronic prescribing to controlled drugs and medicines administration, and to deploy more clinical pharmacists in primary care and care homes. We have also introduced monitoring of the highest risk prescribing practice linked to hospital admissions.”

Source location

2018-0408-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 28 December 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026