Investigation and inquest
On 18th September 2017 I commenced an investigation into the death of Joan Wright. The inquest concluded on the 12th December 2018 and the conclusion was one of Natural Causes
The medical cause of death was 1a) Acute myocardial insufficiency;
1b) Coronary artery atheroma
Circumstances of the death
Joan Wright resided at Belmont Residential Home. She had poor mobility and was unable to verbally communicate. The Care Home was rated inadequate in January 2017. It was subject of ongoing intervention in relation to implementation of an action plan. On 25th August 2017 it was identified she had been given Oramorph incorrectly in the preceding days. She was not seen by a GP. On 16th September 2017 she died at Belmont Residential Home. Post-mortem examination found that she had extensive coronary artery atheroma which had caused her death.
Coroner’s concerns
1. The inquest heard that Oramorph had different classifications depending on the strength prescribed. This impacts the storage/handling arrangements. The inquest heard that opioids can have a significant impact at whatever strength they are prescribed if given in excess;
2. Evidence was given that because of the abolition of PCT and replacement with CCG’s there was no designation of the CCG’s as designated bodies with statutory responsibility in relation to drugs. This was an oversight but has not been corrected;
3. Following the maladministration of medication to Mrs Wright, the inquest heard that the matter was reported to GMP .The CDLO investigated but did not liaise with the local police unit or discuss the safeguarding implications;
4. GMP’s call handler did not recognise the potential safeguarding risks of the maladministration of opioids to a vulnerable member of the community and referred the report to the local division. The local division assessor (LRO) failed to recognise the safeguarding risks and filed the report as theft. GMP have changed their policies significantly since the matter was referred to them after Mrs Wright’s death. However it was unclear about whether or not the issue had been addressed by Forces nationally. The inquest was told that the CDLO role had been brought in after the Shipman inquiry to ensure safeguarding risks were identified in relation to maladministration of drugs;
5. The home in question has been rated as inadequate by CQC and was under regular monitoring via an action plan. It was also being visited regularly by the Local Authority Quality Support Team every 10 days or so. One of the issues previously identified was poor management/documentation of medication. Notwithstanding that, access and unauthorised repeated administration of Oramorph took place;
6. The CQC gave evidence that the legislation requires regular checks by care homes in relation to medication but there is no statutory definition of what regular means. As a result in some it is monthly in others weekly.