PFD report

Oliver Steeper · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 May 2024•Central and South East Kent

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Lack of refresher training on baby weaning for nursery staff
  2. Insufficient staff knowledge and training on baby weaning and safe nursery feeding
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe implementation of choking-risk prevention measures
  3. Failure to elicit, record, review and apply accurate information about children’s individual weaning stages
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Assess qualifications against the revised criteria and add approved qualifications to the Early Years Qualifications List.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 31 May 2024.
  2. Action

    Publish sector guidance on food safety, choking prevention and introducing babies to solid food.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 31 May 2024.
  3. Action

    Complete the EYFS safeguarding consultation and use its findings to develop proposed safer-eating requirements.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 31 May 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Awarding organisations and training providers are responsible for developing and delivering qualification content that meets the Department’s early-years criteria.

    Stated by Department for EducationRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of refresher training on baby weaning for nursery staff

Wider context from the report

“3. Staff Education Regarding Weaning Stages Evidence has been heard during the course of the inquest concerning nursery staffs' understanding of the different stages of weaning that a child moves through. It was not clear that staff appreciated the importance of mirroring weaning at home with weaning at nursery. Staff (and systems) did not appear to ensure that detailed and accurate information about a child’s individual weaning stage was elicited from parents, recorded, audited, reviewed and applied. It was not clear that staff appreciated the importance of eliciting and recording this detailed information from the family. Despite staff members having levels 1, 2 and 3 Diplomas in Childcare and Education, there was limited evidence of any knowledge or training on the stages of baby weaning and the risk of a child choking on food. As such, it is not clear that the content of those qualifications adequately covers stages of weaning and how to safely wean in the nursery environment. Even if the training does cover this, it is not apparent that any refresher training is provided to nursery staff holding these qualifications, to ensure that they are up to date in their knowledge, i.e. continuing professional development. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient staff knowledge and training on baby weaning and safe nursery feeding

Wider context from the report

“3. Staff Education Regarding Weaning Stages Evidence has been heard during the course of the inquest concerning nursery staffs' understanding of the different stages of weaning that a child moves through. It was not clear that staff appreciated the importance of mirroring weaning at home with weaning at nursery. Staff (and systems) did not appear to ensure that detailed and accurate information about a child’s individual weaning stage was elicited from parents, recorded, audited, reviewed and applied. It was not clear that staff appreciated the importance of eliciting and recording this detailed information from the family. Despite staff members having levels 1, 2 and 3 Diplomas in Childcare and Education, there was limited evidence of any knowledge or training on the stages of baby weaning and the risk of a child choking on food. As such, it is not clear that the content of those qualifications adequately covers stages of weaning and how to safely wean in the nursery environment. Even if the training does cover this, it is not apparent that any refresher training is provided to nursery staff holding these qualifications, to ensure that they are up to date in their knowledge, i.e. continuing professional development. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe implementation of choking-risk prevention measures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to elicit, record, review and apply accurate information about children’s individual weaning stages

Wider context from the report

“3. Staff Education Regarding Weaning Stages Evidence has been heard during the course of the inquest concerning nursery staffs' understanding of the different stages of weaning that a child moves through. It was not clear that staff appreciated the importance of mirroring weaning at home with weaning at nursery. Staff (and systems) did not appear to ensure that detailed and accurate information about a child’s individual weaning stage was elicited from parents, recorded, audited, reviewed and applied. It was not clear that staff appreciated the importance of eliciting and recording this detailed information from the family. Despite staff members having levels 1, 2 and 3 Diplomas in Childcare and Education, there was limited evidence of any knowledge or training on the stages of baby weaning and the risk of a child choking on food. As such, it is not clear that the content of those qualifications adequately covers stages of weaning and how to safely wean in the nursery environment. Even if the training does cover this, it is not apparent that any refresher training is provided to nursery staff holding these qualifications, to ensure that they are up to date in their knowledge, i.e. continuing professional development. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of refresher training for paediatric first aid staff between three-year renewals

Wider context from the report

“2. Paediatric First Aid Training Validity Period. Evidence heard at the inquest was that staff PFA certificates lasted for a period of 3 years before requiring renewal. The EYFS Framework currently states as follows: [§3.25]: PFA training must be renewed every three years and be relevant for workers caring for young children and where relevant, babies. The guidelines for the management of paediatric choking that were current at the time of this incident were published by the Resuscitation Council UK, and this remains the case today. It was apparent from the evidence heard in this inquest that when confronted with an emergency situation with a choking child, the nursery staff were not able to comply with the Resuscitation Council UK guidelines. The expert stated: “the first aid care delivered overall was of a relatively poor standard for nursery staff trained and current in paediatric first aid.” I am concerned that staff with a valid PFA training certificate, may have had that training up to 3 years earlier without having had any refresher training in the interim. They would still be compliant with the EYFS statutory framework requirements, but staff may not be able to recall the detail of their training to ensure correct and effective first aid is given, due to the passage of time. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate staff competence to provide first aid.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient numbers of qualified paediatric first aiders present on site

Wider context from the report

“1. Paediatric First Aid (PFA) Requirements I have heard evidence during the course of the inquest that the Early Years Foundation Stage Statutory Framework For Group and School-Based Providers stated that of all the staff on site “at least one” member of staff must have a valid paediatric first aid certificate. Whilst I accept that providers could potentially have more, there is a risk that there is only one PFA certified member of staff on site, and that this would still be compliant within the framework mandate. If there is only one PFA certified staff member, they may be solely responsible for providing first aid for all the children on site. If that one staff member is unavailable or indisposed when an emergency situation arises, or simply is unable to render the required first aid by nature of the traumatic events unfolding, this may in turn have a serious and detrimental effect on the child requiring assistance. Other staff members, who perhaps have not had recent PFA training, or staff with no PFA training at all, may have to urgently deal with the evolving situation. There is always a risk that young children, particularly weaning babies like Oliver, will require emergency first aid due to sudden choking. In the 20 years between 2001 and 2021, the Office for National statistics recorded 40 deaths due to choking in infants (children aged less than one year) in England and Wales. I am concerned that the Framework does not mandate an increased number of qualified paediatric first aiders to be present on site. I have reviewed the current EYFS statutory framework, published 8th December 2023 and updated 4th January 2024. This contains the same provision as that which was in force at the time of Oliver’s death in 2021. See paragraph 3.29. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable on-site emergency medical and first-aid response arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess qualifications against the revised criteria and add approved qualifications to the Early Years Qualifications List.

Verbatim wording from the response

“20. Following the publication of the new EYE criteria, the Department asked awarding organisations and training providers to update their qualifications at Levels 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8*2 to meet the new criteria and submit them to DfE for assessment and approval by September 2024, in order to remain on the EYQL after September 2024. These qualifications must then be delivered for “first teach” for new learners by September 2025 at the latest, so that new learners starting on a qualification from September 2025 take on an approved qualification. As part of its business-as-usual activity, the Department is currently in the process of approving qualifications against the new criteria and will be adding approved qualifications to the EYQL by September 2024.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 5 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish sector guidance on food safety, choking prevention and introducing babies to solid food.

Verbatim wording from the response

“26. In addition to the EYFS statutory requirements, we have also produced information for the sector regarding food safety and choking prevention which was published in July 2021, and introducing babies to solid food which was published in March 2024. This can be found on the DfE owned “Help for early years provider’s” platform:”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 7 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete the EYFS safeguarding consultation and use its findings to develop proposed safer-eating requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“12. The requirements outlined above when implemented together should ensure that there is a PFA member of staff available and ready to respond to incidents quickly. However, the Department recognises the importance of staff members being PFA trained, especially whilst children are eating, which is why in the recent EYFS safeguarding consultation which closed on 17 June 2024, we have put forward the following proposals:”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 4 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and publish revised Level 3 Early Years Educator qualification criteria incorporating weaning and choking-prevention content.

Verbatim wording from the response

“19. The Level 3 Early Years Educator (EYE) qualifications criteria were recently reviewed in order to improve the quality of the criteria and by extension the quality of early years qualifications at Level 3 and above, and ensure better-quality care for children as a result. Following the review and subsequent public consultation, the Department published the new Level 3 EYE qualifications criteria in April 2023. The new criteria can be found at Annex E of the Early years qualification requirements and standards document and will come into effect from 1 September 2024.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 5 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Awarding organisations and training providers are responsible for developing and delivering qualification content that meets the Department’s early-years criteria.

Verbatim wording from the response

“17. The Department sets the standards (the early years qualifications criteria) which underpin early years qualifications. The qualifications criteria we hold are the Level 2 Early Years Practitioner criteria, and the Level 3 Early Years Educator criteria, and can be found in the Early Years Qualifications and Standards document.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 5 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing staffing, supervision and paediatric first-aid requirements should ensure a trained responder is available quickly during emergencies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“‘3.30. Providers should take into account the number of children, staff, and layout of premises to ensure that a paediatric first aider is able to respond to emergencies quickly.’”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 3 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Continue monitoring and reviewing safeguarding requirements for early years settings.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 31 May 2024.
  2. 2

    Publish the Government response to the EYFS safeguarding consultation.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 31 May 2024.
  3. 3

    Consider this report’s findings in future revisions of the Level 2 Early Years Practitioner qualification criteria.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 31 May 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring and reviewing safeguarding requirements for early years settings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“29. The safety of our youngest children is our utmost priority and the Department continually monitors and reviews safeguarding requirements for early years settings to make sure children are kept as safe as possible.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 8 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish the Government response to the EYFS safeguarding consultation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“28. The EYFS safeguarding consultation concluded on 17 June 2024. The consultation proposes changes to the safeguarding section in both the childminder and group/school-based provider versions of the EYFS, to make it easier for practitioners to understand the requirements and how to fulfil them. As already outlined, there is a proposal for a new safer eating section which has been informed by extensive engagement with providers, health professionals, sector stakeholders and safeguarding experts and using lessons learned from previous incidents. We expect to publish the response to the consultation in autumn this year.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 8 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider this report’s findings in future revisions of the Level 2 Early Years Practitioner qualification criteria.

Verbatim wording from the response

“23. The Level 2 Early Years Practitioner (EYP) criteria were last updated in 2019 and include key subsections on Safeguarding (Section 2), Health and Safety (Section 3) and Wellbeing (section 4). While the criteria do not contain explicit reference to preventing choking as such, there is reference to carrying out routines including for eating (including weaning) (see para 4.5 of the criteria at Annex C of the Early Years qualification requirements and standards document), and to assessing risks and acting accordingly including in the event of children requiring urgent medical attention (see para 3.3 of the criteria at Annex C). The Department does not currently have plans to revise the Level 2 EYP criteria in the near future, but we will consider the findings of this report in any future revisions as part of our regulatory role.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 6 · response
Published 31 May 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026