PFD report

Kevin Phillip SHERWOOD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 Sep 2018•Hertfordshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised1

  1. Insufficient railway boundary fencing in areas used by dog walkers and others
    Part of recurring concern: Ineffective controls preventing access to railway tracks
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Reassess the Icknield Way boundary risk using the fencing standard after the incident.

    Stated by Network RailStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 January 2019.
  2. Action

    Carry out three-monthly inspections of the Icknield Way fencing to manage its increased risk rating.

    Stated by Network RailStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 18 January 2019.
  3. Action

    Renew the Icknield Way fencing with a scheduled replacement in 2019/2020.

    Stated by Network RailStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 18 January 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing compliant fencing, three-monthly inspections and scheduled renewal are considered sufficient pending replacement.

    Stated by Network RailExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient railway boundary fencing in areas used by dog walkers and others

Wider context from the report

“(1) Only post and wire fencing at the railway boundary in this area. The areas on both sides off the Ickneild Way, particularly to the west of the railway, are used by dog walkers and others. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective controls preventing access to railway tracks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reassess the Icknield Way boundary risk using the fencing standard after the incident.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At the time of the incident the boundary measure in the Icknield Way, Hitchin area had been assessed as 3 (Likelihood) x 3 (Consequence) + 0 (Condition) = 9 and, as such, deemed medium risk. The class 3 (1.4m high) boundary measure on both sides of the track was installed twelve years ago. The inspection prior to the incident on 15th February 2018 recorded the fence as ‘good condition’ and regarded as compliant to the Fencing Standard.”

Source location

2018-0289-Response-by-Network-Rail
Page 2 · response
Published 18 January 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Carry out three-monthly inspections of the Icknield Way fencing to manage its increased risk rating.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a result of this incident, the site was re-assessed (in line with the Fencing Standard) and the likelihood score increased from 3 to 4 as there was now “recorded evidence of trespass or vandalism within the last twelve months”. The consequence score was also increased from 3 to 4 as a result of the increase in numbers of trains through this section of railway. The revised score, therefore, became 4 (Likelihood) x 4 (Consequence) + 0 (Condition) = 16.”

Source location

2018-0289-Response-by-Network-Rail
Page 2 · response
Published 18 January 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Renew the Icknield Way fencing with a scheduled replacement in 2019/2020.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The mitigation for the increased risk score is a requirement to increase the frequency of inspection from annual to three monthly. The standard also requires that, at the point where the current fence becomes life expired, it will be replaced by a class 1 (1.8m high) fence. A fence line may be renewed prior to life expiry in some circumstances due to operational requirements or route enhancement projects (subject to funding).”

Source location

2018-0289-Response-by-Network-Rail
Page 2 · response
Published 18 January 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing compliant fencing, three-monthly inspections and scheduled renewal are considered sufficient pending replacement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The mitigation for the increased risk score is a requirement to increase the frequency of inspection from annual to three monthly. The standard also requires that, at the point where the current fence becomes life expired, it will be replaced by a class 1 (1.8m high) fence. A fence line may be renewed prior to life expiry in some circumstances due to operational requirements or route enhancement projects (subject to funding).”

Source location

2018-0289-Response-by-Network-Rail
Page 2 · response
Published 18 January 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Continue working with industry partners to prevent loss of life in the Hitchin area through the Thameslink suicide-prevention strategy.

    Stated by Network RailStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 18 January 2019.
  2. 2

    Add platform-end anti-trespass measures at Hitchin Station to deter track access.

    Stated by Network RailStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 January 2019.
  3. 3

    Introduce roving patrollers focused on suicide prevention and rapid incident response along the Thameslink route.

    Stated by Network RailStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 January 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with industry partners to prevent loss of life in the Hitchin area through the Thameslink suicide-prevention strategy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Network Rail and the British Transport Police (BTP), together with Train Operating Companies, are working together to actively mitigate against suicidal intent along the line of route from Peterborough to Kings Cross and Bedford to St Pancras (which includes Hitchin), together known as the Thameslink route.”

Source location

2018-0289-Response-by-Network-Rail
Page 2 · response
Published 18 January 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add platform-end anti-trespass measures at Hitchin Station to deter track access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Specifically, Platform End Anti-trespass measures have been added to Hitchin Station to deter access on to the track. In addition to existing Mobile Operations staff who patrol the area, the Route has been supported by BTP Emergency Interventions Units and BTP Embedded Inspectors. Network Rail has also introduced a team of ‘roving patrollers’ whose focus is suicide prevention on this line of route and providing rapid response to incidents. We continue to work closely with industry partners to prevent loss of life in the Hitchin area as part of our strategy for the Thameslink route.”

Source location

2018-0289-Response-by-Network-Rail
Page 3 · response
Published 18 January 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce roving patrollers focused on suicide prevention and rapid incident response along the Thameslink route.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Specifically, Platform End Anti-trespass measures have been added to Hitchin Station to deter access on to the track. In addition to existing Mobile Operations staff who patrol the area, the Route has been supported by BTP Emergency Interventions Units and BTP Embedded Inspectors. Network Rail has also introduced a team of ‘roving patrollers’ whose focus is suicide prevention on this line of route and providing rapid response to incidents. We continue to work closely with industry partners to prevent loss of life in the Hitchin area as part of our strategy for the Thameslink route.”

Source location

2018-0289-Response-by-Network-Rail
Page 3 · response
Published 18 January 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026