PFD report

Terence Briney · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Jan 2024•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to consider and investigate treatable conditions in elderly patients when deterioration is attributed to ageing
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Operate a total GP triage model for all medical requests to improve continuity of care.

    Stated by NHS GM Integrated CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2024.
  2. Action

    Have GPs consider neurological causes alongside cancer when older people present with weight loss and swallowing difficulties, and document that consideration for subsequent clinicians.

    Stated by NHS GM Integrated CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2024.
  3. Action

    Review and discuss the case among GP partners to facilitate shared learning about recognising neurological conditions in older people.

    Stated by NHS GM Integrated CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The partners concluded they would not have acted differently because the symptoms and information available made the existing referral approach clinically appropriate.

    Stated by NHS GM Integrated CareNo action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider and investigate treatable conditions in elderly patients when deterioration is attributed to ageing

Wider context from the report

“The inquest heard evidence that symptoms raised by Mr Briney and his family were attributed to old age rather than a possible neurological disease. The evidence before the inquest was that there were situations where clinicians would attribute a deterioration to the aging process rather than consider the whole picture and investigate if there was a treatable condition. This presented a risk that treatable conditions in the elderly could be missed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a total GP triage model for all medical requests to improve continuity of care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since July 2023 we have moved to a total triage model and all medical requests are triaged by a GP who will determine the next course of action thus ensuring continuity care more successfully.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 6 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Have GPs consider neurological causes alongside cancer when older people present with weight loss and swallowing difficulties, and document that consideration for subsequent clinicians.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Having reflected and discussed Mr Briney’s presentation, all GPs are now more likely to consider neurological causes for weight loss and swallowing difficulties in older people, alongside the need to rule out cancer, which would always, realistically need to be done first. This consideration to be documented in the notes to aid other clinicians who may see the patient subsequently.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 6 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and discuss the case among GP partners to facilitate shared learning about recognising neurological conditions in older people.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In light of the Prevention of Future Deaths Report, the GP Partners reviewed Mr Briney’s case and discussed if and what could have been done differently. They analysed all of the interactions between Mr Briney and the practice from the point of his discharge from Stepping Hill Hospital on 25 May 2022 (this admission had been due to a fall down a flight of stairs).”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 4 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The partners concluded they would not have acted differently because the symptoms and information available made the existing referral approach clinically appropriate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“By coming together to review and discuss the circumstances surrounding Mr Briney’s case, this has increased the likelihood of GPs considering the possibility of neurological conditions in older people presenting with similar symptoms. It has also facilitated detailed discussion and hence shared learning. However, the partners felt that they would not have acted differently in this case given the symptoms and information available at the time.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 6 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The symptoms and available information indicated upper gastrointestinal pathology rather than a neurological condition, so cancer exclusion was appropriately prioritised.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Given the comments in the Regulation 28 Report: ‘The inquest heard evidence that symptoms raised by Mr Briney and his family were attributed to old age rather than a possible neurological disease’, the GPs discussed whether they would have considered a referral to neurology at this stage. However, on reflection Mr Briney’s symptoms were in keeping with a possible upper GI cancer and was deemed clinically appropriate to exclude cancer first before investigating other referral options.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 5 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Ensure patients receiving practice text messages are able and willing to use that communication method.

    Stated by NHS GM Integrated CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 12 February 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure patients receiving practice text messages are able and willing to use that communication method.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During the reflection process, it was also discussed that although Mr Briney and his family did respond to text messages from the practice, that there could be more consideration to the age of patients who we engage with via text message. Whilst it is common practice for the GPs to discuss with the patients that they are going to send them a text, we should always ensure that they are able and happy to receive and respond using this method of communication.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 6 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026