PFD report

Noah Lomax · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 May 2019•South Yorkshire (Western)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure of the CAMHS GP referral form process to capture sufficient information for timely assessment
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient detail in referrals for safe risk assessment and prioritisationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable mental health referral pathways
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Maintain updated referral guidance for use with CAMHS referrals.

    Stated by Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 August 2019.
  2. Action

    Update referral guidance to support the revised CAMHS referral form.

    Stated by Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 August 2019.
  3. Action

    Distribute the revised CAMHS referral form and supporting guidance to all General Practitioners by 12 July 2019.

    Stated by Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 August 2019.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the CAMHS GP referral form process to capture sufficient information for timely assessment

Wider context from the report

“1. As I made clear during the Inquest I was concerned about the adequacy of the CAMHS, GP referral form. ████████, Noah’s GP, was inexperienced she had not completed a CAMHS referral form before. She accepted she had not provided sufficient detail in the form. This resulted in CAMHS being unable to assess Noah’s risk and declining Noah’s referral. This in turn meant that Noah did not receive an appointment with CAMHS before his death. The Trust’s investigation report stated that the evidence “suggests that the current referral form does not capture the information required to process referrals without delay.” ████████, CAMHS Clinical Lead, said that there had not been any other problems with the form with GP’s not completing them sufficiently. I am not sure how ████████ is able to be so confident about this. I was told that redesigning the form had been considered by the Trust but was told that this was not the answer. Instead, further training has been provided to GPs within the area. Guidance is attached to the form to assist GPs in completing the form. Having carefully considered the evidence I am not satisfied that steps have been put in place to ameliorate the risk identified. Given the realities of the pressures on a GP’s day expecting a GP to use their 10 minute appointment to extract sufficient information for the referral and then at some point complete a referral form, with which they may be unfamiliar, creates the risk that relevant information may not be provided. I would invite the Trust to reconsider whether the form could be improved to reduce the risk of inadequate or insufficient information being provided which may result in a delay in care. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient detail in referrals for safe risk assessment and prioritisation; Unreliable mental health referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain updated referral guidance for use with CAMHS referrals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During the inquest it was confirmed that the referral guidelines were being updated with input from a General Practitioner. This has now been completed and the guidance is now in place and being used. The current form will continue to be used alongside the new guidance in mitigation until the actions outlined below have been completed.”

Source location

2019-0186-Response-by-Sheffields-Childrens-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 14 August 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update referral guidance to support the revised CAMHS referral form.

Verbatim wording from the response

“consists of a number of General Practitioners and 2 service users. Comments from this group have been collated and are to inform necessary amendments to the referral form. Subsequently the current guidance will be updated to support the new referral form and this will then be distributed to all General Practitioners.”

Source location

2019-0186-Response-by-Sheffields-Childrens-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 August 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Distribute the revised CAMHS referral form and supporting guidance to all General Practitioners by 12 July 2019.

Verbatim wording from the response

“consists of a number of General Practitioners and 2 service users. Comments from this group have been collated and are to inform necessary amendments to the referral form. Subsequently the current guidance will be updated to support the new referral form and this will then be distributed to all General Practitioners.”

Source location

2019-0186-Response-by-Sheffields-Childrens-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 August 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and amend the CAMHS referral form using General Practitioner and service-user feedback.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The CAMHS team have commenced a review of the referral form, and a draft form was sent to the Clinical Director for Mental Health commissioning the Sheffield Clinical Commissioning Group (SCCG), for comments. This draft was reviewed by SCCG’s Clinical Reference Group, which”

Source location

2019-0186-Response-by-Sheffields-Childrens-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 14 August 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026