PFD report

Jonathan Neal Goldstein and 2 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Dec 2023•Inner South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to restrict untrained PPL(A) licence holders from conducting mountain flying
  2. Lack of compulsory specific mountain flying training in theoretical and practical PPL training
  3. Failure to require flying schools to provide specific mountain flying advice to PPL(A) candidates
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Disseminate the new webpage and guidance through SkyWise, training organisations and GA representative organisations.

    Stated by Civil Aviation AuthorityStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 December 2023.
  2. Action

    Create and maintain a dedicated webpage publishing relevant international guidance on the risks and challenges of high-mountain flying.

    Stated by Civil Aviation AuthorityStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 December 2023.
  3. Action

    Develop and publish a Safety Sense Leaflet providing mountain-flying safety information and guidance to pilots.

    Stated by Civil Aviation AuthorityStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 December 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    New guidance and existing private pilot licensing requirements provide necessary knowledge, information and skills for safe mountainous VFR flight.

    Stated by Civil Aviation AuthorityExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to restrict untrained PPL(A) licence holders from conducting mountain flying

Wider context from the report

“Specifically, I am concerned that: 1) There is no compulsory specific mountain flying training element to either the theoretical or practical parts of PPL training, and once qualified, there is no restriction on the right of pilots with PPL(A) licences to conduct mountain flying without having had such training; 2) Nor, in the absence of any formal requirement, does the CAA request or require flying schools to provide specific mountain flying advice for PPL(A) candidates; and 3) Despite the safety advice given by the STSIB, guidance has not been given in the UK by any organisation to currently qualified pilots, highlighting the specific risks of navigating through mountain passes, and offering either guidance, or the location where guidance can be found. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of compulsory specific mountain flying training in theoretical and practical PPL training

Wider context from the report

“Specifically, I am concerned that: 1) There is no compulsory specific mountain flying training element to either the theoretical or practical parts of PPL training, and once qualified, there is no restriction on the right of pilots with PPL(A) licences to conduct mountain flying without having had such training; 2) Nor, in the absence of any formal requirement, does the CAA request or require flying schools to provide specific mountain flying advice for PPL(A) candidates; and 3) Despite the safety advice given by the STSIB, guidance has not been given in the UK by any organisation to currently qualified pilots, highlighting the specific risks of navigating through mountain passes, and offering either guidance, or the location where guidance can be found. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to require flying schools to provide specific mountain flying advice to PPL(A) candidates

Wider context from the report

“Specifically, I am concerned that: 1) There is no compulsory specific mountain flying training element to either the theoretical or practical parts of PPL training, and once qualified, there is no restriction on the right of pilots with PPL(A) licences to conduct mountain flying without having had such training; 2) Nor, in the absence of any formal requirement, does the CAA request or require flying schools to provide specific mountain flying advice for PPL(A) candidates; and 3) Despite the safety advice given by the STSIB, guidance has not been given in the UK by any organisation to currently qualified pilots, highlighting the specific risks of navigating through mountain passes, and offering either guidance, or the location where guidance can be found. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide currently qualified pilots with guidance on the risks of navigating through mountain passes

Wider context from the report

“Specifically, I am concerned that: 1) There is no compulsory specific mountain flying training element to either the theoretical or practical parts of PPL training, and once qualified, there is no restriction on the right of pilots with PPL(A) licences to conduct mountain flying without having had such training; 2) Nor, in the absence of any formal requirement, does the CAA request or require flying schools to provide specific mountain flying advice for PPL(A) candidates; and 3) Despite the safety advice given by the STSIB, guidance has not been given in the UK by any organisation to currently qualified pilots, highlighting the specific risks of navigating through mountain passes, and offering either guidance, or the location where guidance can be found. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate the new webpage and guidance through SkyWise, training organisations and GA representative organisations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The CAA will use a number of platforms to share the new webpage and guidance widely among the GA stakeholder community, including SkyWise, a free subscription service providing regular updates on items such as safety guidance, regulations and more to approximately 12,000 members of the UK GA community. The CAA will especially ensure that all Approved and Declared Training Organisations in the UK are made aware of the guidance. The CAA will also bring the new webpage and guidance to the attention of GA representative organisations (including, for example, members of the General Aviation Partnership) for them to promote among their members.”

Source location

Response from UK Civil Aviation Authority
Page 2 · response
Published 12 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create and maintain a dedicated webpage publishing relevant international guidance on the risks and challenges of high-mountain flying.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The CAA has therefore decided to create a webpage on its website dedicated to the risks of flying in high mountain terrain. The CAA considers that the most appropriate guidance is that produced by National Aviation Authorities (“NAAs”) of states which do have high mountain terrain because those states have the necessary expertise to provide such guidance. The CAA will therefore provide links to relevant international guidance given on mountain flying and publish it within the Safety Topics section of its GA webpages to ensure the information can be easily located. The links will be regularly checked and updated to ensure the guidance remains current and relevant.”

Source location

Response from UK Civil Aviation Authority
Page 2 · response
Published 12 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and publish a Safety Sense Leaflet providing mountain-flying safety information and guidance to pilots.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The CAA has also decided to develop a Safety Sense Leaflet on mountain flying. Safety Sense Leaflets are an additional form of information and guidance to pilots covering specific safety topics. For example, safety guidance and information from the CAA exists for UK GA pilots flying under VFR conditions in the form of the Safety Sense Leaflet: Flight under VFR - Visual Flight Rules.¹”

Source location

Response from UK Civil Aviation Authority
Page 2 · response
Published 12 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider whether to implement regulatory-framework changes in light of relevant safety data and international developments, following required consultation and impact assessment processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The CAA will continue to review UK aviation safety data relevant to the concerns raised by the Assistant Coroner and will monitor any future developments in the international aviation context in this area. Where appropriate, the CAA will consider whether to implement a change to the regulatory framework to reflect those developments. Any decision to take mandatory action in respect of changes to the requirements associated with obtaining a PPL(A) must follow the CAA’s aviation safety legislation and policy development process, including public stakeholder consultation and impact assessment, where necessary.”

Source location

Response from UK Civil Aviation Authority
Page 3 · response
Published 12 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

New guidance and existing private pilot licensing requirements provide necessary knowledge, information and skills for safe mountainous VFR flight.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The new webpage and guidance, together with the requirements for private pilot licensing in the UK, mean that the CAA is satisfied PPL(A) holders will have access to the necessary knowledge, information and skills to safely operate an aircraft in a variety of environments, including planning and executing a safe transit along a VFR route in mountainous terrain in good weather. The CAA has summarised the requirements applicable to a PPL(A) below.”

Source location

Response from UK Civil Aviation Authority
Page 2 · response
Published 12 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Detailed mountain-flying guidance is most appropriately produced by national aviation authorities with high-mountain expertise.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The CAA has therefore decided to create a webpage on its website dedicated to the risks of flying in high mountain terrain. The CAA considers that the most appropriate guidance is that produced by National Aviation Authorities (“NAAs”) of states which do have high mountain terrain because those states have the necessary expertise to provide such guidance. The CAA will therefore provide links to relevant international guidance given on mountain flying and publish it within the Safety Topics section of its GA webpages to ensure the information can be easily located. The links will be regularly checked and updated to ensure the guidance remains current and relevant.”

Source location

Response from UK Civil Aviation Authority
Page 2 · response
Published 12 December 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Continue reviewing UK aviation safety data and monitoring international developments relevant to high-mountain flying concerns.

    Stated by Civil Aviation AuthorityStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 12 December 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue reviewing UK aviation safety data and monitoring international developments relevant to high-mountain flying concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The CAA will continue to review UK aviation safety data relevant to the concerns raised by the Assistant Coroner and will monitor any future developments in the international aviation context in this area. Where appropriate, the CAA will consider whether to implement a change to the regulatory framework to reflect those developments. Any decision to take mandatory action in respect of changes to the requirements associated with obtaining a PPL(A) must follow the CAA’s aviation safety legislation and policy development process, including public stakeholder consultation and impact assessment, where necessary.”

Source location

Response from UK Civil Aviation Authority
Page 3 · response
Published 12 December 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026