PFD report

Henry George HONOUR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Nov 2017•Central and South East Kent

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to implement required falls precautions
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
  2. Unclear bedrail risk assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable bedrail safety controls
  3. Failure to maintain adequate, complete, current and enforced falls risk assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to implement required falls precautions

Wider context from the report

“(1) Between January 2017 and April 2017 five deaths occurred on Cambridge Wards at William Harvey Hospital. Common to each was the fact that the death was caused as a result of a fall on the ward in circumstances where falls risk assessments were either inadequate, incomplete, not reviewed or not enforced. Inquests in respect of each the deaths have been held, the last in November 2017. The Trust was given an opportunity following the earlier inquests to provide evidence of changes to practice following the deaths. It is recognised that at the time of hearing the inquests much work has already been done to address these issues but that work is ongoing and parts of that work have not yet been implemented/were in the process of being implemented. It is for this reason that Regulation 28 reports arise from three of the deaths. (2) In respect of Mr Honour the falls risk assessment completed on admission was at best perfunctory, as were subsequent reviews which did not rectify earlier errors or recognise the need for precautionary measures to be taken when Mr. Honour should have been nursed in an observable bed with a falls alert and hip protectors in light of the risks posed. (3) The bedrail risk assessment was difficult to interpret in light of the falls risk assessment, bed rails were utilised when they should not have been. (4) The falls risk assessment was not updated post fall and no protective measures were put in place. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unclear bedrail risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“(1) Between January 2017 and April 2017 five deaths occurred on Cambridge Wards at William Harvey Hospital. Common to each was the fact that the death was caused as a result of a fall on the ward in circumstances where falls risk assessments were either inadequate, incomplete, not reviewed or not enforced. Inquests in respect of each the deaths have been held, the last in November 2017. The Trust was given an opportunity following the earlier inquests to provide evidence of changes to practice following the deaths. It is recognised that at the time of hearing the inquests much work has already been done to address these issues but that work is ongoing and parts of that work have not yet been implemented/were in the process of being implemented. It is for this reason that Regulation 28 reports arise from three of the deaths. (2) In respect of Mr Honour the falls risk assessment completed on admission was at best perfunctory, as were subsequent reviews which did not rectify earlier errors or recognise the need for precautionary measures to be taken when Mr. Honour should have been nursed in an observable bed with a falls alert and hip protectors in light of the risks posed. (3) The bedrail risk assessment was difficult to interpret in light of the falls risk assessment, bed rails were utilised when they should not have been. (4) The falls risk assessment was not updated post fall and no protective measures were put in place. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable bedrail safety controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain adequate, complete, current and enforced falls risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“(1) Between January 2017 and April 2017 five deaths occurred on Cambridge Wards at William Harvey Hospital. Common to each was the fact that the death was caused as a result of a fall on the ward in circumstances where falls risk assessments were either inadequate, incomplete, not reviewed or not enforced. Inquests in respect of each the deaths have been held, the last in November 2017. The Trust was given an opportunity following the earlier inquests to provide evidence of changes to practice following the deaths. It is recognised that at the time of hearing the inquests much work has already been done to address these issues but that work is ongoing and parts of that work have not yet been implemented/were in the process of being implemented. It is for this reason that Regulation 28 reports arise from three of the deaths. (2) In respect of Mr Honour the falls risk assessment completed on admission was at best perfunctory, as were subsequent reviews which did not rectify earlier errors or recognise the need for precautionary measures to be taken when Mr. Honour should have been nursed in an observable bed with a falls alert and hip protectors in light of the risks posed. (3) The bedrail risk assessment was difficult to interpret in light of the falls risk assessment, bed rails were utilised when they should not have been. (4) The falls risk assessment was not updated post fall and no protective measures were put in place. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inappropriate use of bed rails

Wider context from the report

“(1) Between January 2017 and April 2017 five deaths occurred on Cambridge Wards at William Harvey Hospital. Common to each was the fact that the death was caused as a result of a fall on the ward in circumstances where falls risk assessments were either inadequate, incomplete, not reviewed or not enforced. Inquests in respect of each the deaths have been held, the last in November 2017. The Trust was given an opportunity following the earlier inquests to provide evidence of changes to practice following the deaths. It is recognised that at the time of hearing the inquests much work has already been done to address these issues but that work is ongoing and parts of that work have not yet been implemented/were in the process of being implemented. It is for this reason that Regulation 28 reports arise from three of the deaths. (2) In respect of Mr Honour the falls risk assessment completed on admission was at best perfunctory, as were subsequent reviews which did not rectify earlier errors or recognise the need for precautionary measures to be taken when Mr. Honour should have been nursed in an observable bed with a falls alert and hip protectors in light of the risks posed. (3) The bedrail risk assessment was difficult to interpret in light of the falls risk assessment, bed rails were utilised when they should not have been. (4) The falls risk assessment was not updated post fall and no protective measures were put in place. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Unreliable bedrail safety controls.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.