PFD report

John Paul Pace · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 13 Nov 2023•Essex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to document and embed the drug detoxification discharge pathway in operating procedures
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to document and embed the drug detoxification discharge pathway in operating procedures

Wider context from the report

“One of the material issues in evidence was about changes in the discharge pathway for prisoners on methadone detoxification as well as those who decided to stop the detoxification programme before completion. CRG identified the need for this change in their Root Cause Analysis review and their live witnesses provided evidence that this new process is now being followed. Forward Trust provided evidence that this is the new process now embedded in their operating procedure. However, no documentary evidence of this new drug detoxification discharge pathway seems to exist, no protocols, no written procedures, no policy, no addendum to existing policies and procedures. It is my concern that this new discharge pathway aimed at providing monitoring and support to prisoners who stop or complete the programme whilst in prison, has not been embedded in your organisations’ operating procedure and as such, there is a risk to prisoners in the future as compliance with the new discharge pathway and consistency of operations cannot be ensured. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Added the protocol to Clinical Governance, Managers and Staff meeting agendas.

    Stated by The Forward TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 November 2023.
  2. 2

    Conducted an internal audit of relevant policies and procedures.

    Stated by The Forward TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 November 2023.
  3. 3

    Published the new protocol on the organisational intranet.

    Stated by The Forward TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 November 2023.
  4. 4

    Drafted and implemented a protocol for managing non-engaging service users.

    Stated by The Forward TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 November 2023.
  5. 5

    Facilitated dissemination and staff training using the protocol’s matrix and signatory documents.

    Stated by The Forward TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 November 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Added the protocol to Clinical Governance, Managers and Staff meeting agendas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The new protocol has now been published on the policy section of our Intranet. A dissemination and training programme has been facilitated using the matrix and Staff signatory documents contained within the appendices of the protocol. We have also added the protocol to the Clinical Governance, Managers and Staff meeting agendas.”

Source location

Response from the Forward Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conducted an internal audit of relevant policies and procedures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following an internal audit of the relevant policies and procedures, we have now drafted and implemented a new protocol on the ‘Management of Non-engaging Service Users Protocol’ provided with our response.”

Source location

Response from the Forward Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Published the new protocol on the organisational intranet.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The new protocol has now been published on the policy section of our Intranet. A dissemination and training programme has been facilitated using the matrix and Staff signatory documents contained within the appendices of the protocol. We have also added the protocol to the Clinical Governance, Managers and Staff meeting agendas.”

Source location

Response from the Forward Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Drafted and implemented a protocol for managing non-engaging service users.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following an internal audit of the relevant policies and procedures, we have now drafted and implemented a new protocol on the ‘Management of Non-engaging Service Users Protocol’ provided with our response.”

Source location

Response from the Forward Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Facilitated dissemination and staff training using the protocol’s matrix and signatory documents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The new protocol has now been published on the policy section of our Intranet. A dissemination and training programme has been facilitated using the matrix and Staff signatory documents contained within the appendices of the protocol. We have also added the protocol to the Clinical Governance, Managers and Staff meeting agendas.”

Source location

Response from the Forward Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026