PFD report

Susan Lynne EDWARDS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Jun 2024•Worcestershire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of a system to ensure that mechanical thromboprophylaxis instructions are carried out
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate thromboprophylaxis for patients at risk of venous thromboembolism
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Include prescription-chart checks in matron audits to verify prophylaxis prescriptions are signed as in place.

    Stated by Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 June 2024.
  2. Action

    Implement mechanical prophylaxis documentation on the electronic patient prescribing and administration system.

    Stated by Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 June 2024.
  3. Action

    Deliver weekly teaching on mechanical prophylaxis and reinforce signing prescription charts to confirm prophylaxis is in place.

    Stated by Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 June 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a system to ensure that mechanical thromboprophylaxis instructions are carried out

Wider context from the report

“1) On 19 September 2023 a Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment made clear that Mrs. Edwards should be provided with mechanical thromboprophylaxis. This instruction was not entered on Mrs. Edwards’ anticoagulation drug card, and Mrs. Edwards was not provided with any form of mechanical thromboprophylaxis between that date and her death 18 days later on 7 October 2023. No nurse or reviewing doctor picked up on this omission. Although I was satisfied that, in this case, the provision of mechanical thromboprophylaxis would probably not have prevented Mrs. Edwards’ death, I am concerned that: (a) no system appears to be in place at Worcestershire Royal Hospital to ensure that such an instruction is carried out; and (b) as long as that remains the case, the lives of patients who require thromboprophylaxis during a hospital admission may be put at risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate thromboprophylaxis for patients at risk of venous thromboembolism.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include prescription-chart checks in matron audits to verify prophylaxis prescriptions are signed as in place.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Monitoring:”

Source location

Response from Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement mechanical prophylaxis documentation on the electronic patient prescribing and administration system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Long term plan is this will be on the electronic patient medical prescribing / administration system.”

Source location

Response from Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver weekly teaching on mechanical prophylaxis and reinforce signing prescription charts to confirm prophylaxis is in place.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. We have focussed on educating our staff in order to provide clear instructions around this area and will implement the following:”

Source location

Response from Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Reinforce prophylaxis requirements across clinical areas through safety huddles.

    Stated by Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 June 2024.
  2. 2

    Provide teaching to junior doctors on the practical effects of different prophylaxis types.

    Stated by Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 June 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reinforce prophylaxis requirements across clinical areas through safety huddles.

Verbatim wording from the response

“○ Reminder of the above is to be verbalised across all areas via safety huddles.”

Source location

Response from Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide teaching to junior doctors on the practical effects of different prophylaxis types.

Verbatim wording from the response

“○ Anti-coagulation nurses are going to provide some teaching to the junior doctor workforce to ensure their understanding of the practical impact of the different types of prophylaxis.”

Source location

Response from Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 7 June 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026