PFD report

Pamela Margaret Hands aka Horner · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Dec 2017•Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of guidance on monitoring patients after administration of an anaesthetic nerve block
  2. Lack of recognition among emergency medicine professionals of relative opioid toxicity after local anaesthetic nerve block
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to identify clinically significant medication risks
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Update the BOAST hip-fracture management standard to emphasise appropriate monitoring of patients, including those in pain before or after procedures.

    Stated by British Orthopaedic AssociationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 11 February 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Local pain-management guidelines and post-analgesia monitoring involve anaesthesia, pain and nursing teams, so relevant professional bodies should also be consulted.

    Stated by British Orthopaedic AssociationRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of guidance on monitoring patients after administration of an anaesthetic nerve block

Wider context from the report

“The Expert Consultant in Pain Medicine explained that after the fascia iliac block was administered analgesia will occur over 10-15 minutes. As the patient obtains better analgesia from the fascia iliac block, the opioids in the circulation would have a more toxic effect than an analgesic effect. Pain is a potential arousal stimulus keeping the patient awake and aware of their surroundings. Pain is also a respiratory stimulant. There is an intimate link between the neurophysiology of pain and the respiratory stimulant. It was recognised that removing a painful stimulus using a local anaesthetic block can pre-dispose patients who have had opioids to respiratory depression. The risk can be increased if the patient has other respiratory depressant risks such as alcohol which can act synergistically with the opioid. In order to avoid this, the patient would need to be observed during the first 30 minutes after the administration of the block to reverse the effect of the opioid or support the respiration if required to avoid a cardiac arrest and death. At the time of the death were no National Guidelines to advise on the need to monitor patients post procedure or application of the anaesthetic nerve block At inquest it was clear from the evidence of the Clinical Director of Emergency Medicine that in 2015 the effect of relative opioid toxicity following the administration of a local anaesthetic nerve block for proximal femur fractures was not widely recognised within Emergency Medicine. As there was an increase in the use of fascia iliac block in conjunction with opioid analgesia in emergency medicine, this risk should be highlighted to health professionals so that they were aware of the risk and the appropriate guidelines put in place. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of recognition among emergency medicine professionals of relative opioid toxicity after local anaesthetic nerve block

Wider context from the report

“The Expert Consultant in Pain Medicine explained that after the fascia iliac block was administered analgesia will occur over 10-15 minutes. As the patient obtains better analgesia from the fascia iliac block, the opioids in the circulation would have a more toxic effect than an analgesic effect. Pain is a potential arousal stimulus keeping the patient awake and aware of their surroundings. Pain is also a respiratory stimulant. There is an intimate link between the neurophysiology of pain and the respiratory stimulant. It was recognised that removing a painful stimulus using a local anaesthetic block can pre-dispose patients who have had opioids to respiratory depression. The risk can be increased if the patient has other respiratory depressant risks such as alcohol which can act synergistically with the opioid. In order to avoid this, the patient would need to be observed during the first 30 minutes after the administration of the block to reverse the effect of the opioid or support the respiration if required to avoid a cardiac arrest and death. At the time of the death were no National Guidelines to advise on the need to monitor patients post procedure or application of the anaesthetic nerve block At inquest it was clear from the evidence of the Clinical Director of Emergency Medicine that in 2015 the effect of relative opioid toxicity following the administration of a local anaesthetic nerve block for proximal femur fractures was not widely recognised within Emergency Medicine. As there was an increase in the use of fascia iliac block in conjunction with opioid analgesia in emergency medicine, this risk should be highlighted to health professionals so that they were aware of the risk and the appropriate guidelines put in place. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to identify clinically significant medication risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the BOAST hip-fracture management standard to emphasise appropriate monitoring of patients, including those in pain before or after procedures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“On our part, we intend that our BOAST (BOA Standards for Trauma) document that covers the management of hip fractures will be updated to reflect and emphasise the need for appropriate monitoring of all patients particularly those in pain pre or post procedure. This document is due for renewal within the next 12months.”

Source location

2017-0373-Response-by-British-Orthopaedic-Association
Page 2 · response
Published 11 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Local pain-management guidelines and post-analgesia monitoring involve anaesthesia, pain and nursing teams, so relevant professional bodies should also be consulted.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We appreciate your recognition that a multidisciplinary team is involved in patient care but we note that you have only contacted the BOA and the Royal College of Emergency Medicine with respect to this incident. It is often the Anaesthetists and the Pain Team who are involved in the local guidelines for management of pain in patients (including post procedural pain) and the Nursing Staff who take prime responsibility for the monitoring of such patients following the administration of analgesic medication in any format. We feel that it important that your advice is distributed to all involved and we would like to suggest that you also seek input from the relevant bodies for nursing and anaesthesia, namely the RCN and the AAGBI.”

Source location

2017-0373-Response-by-British-Orthopaedic-Association
Page 1 · response
Published 11 February 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. 1

    Develop and advocate a prompt multidisciplinary approach to assessing and managing patients with femoral-neck fractures.

    Stated by British Orthopaedic AssociationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 February 2018.
  2. 2

    Develop dedicated trauma lists for patients with hip fractures.

    Stated by British Orthopaedic AssociationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 February 2018.
  3. 3

    Cascade relevant hip-fracture care updates to BOA members through regular emails.

    Stated by British Orthopaedic AssociationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 February 2018.
  4. 4

    Discuss hip-fracture care outcomes at annual national meetings and within relevant specialist societies.

    Stated by British Orthopaedic AssociationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 February 2018.
  5. 5

    Develop written standards for managing hip fractures.

    Stated by British Orthopaedic AssociationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 February 2018.
  6. 6

    Establish the National Hip Fracture Database to monitor care processes and patient outcomes.

    Stated by British Orthopaedic AssociationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 February 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and advocate a prompt multidisciplinary approach to assessing and managing patients with femoral-neck fractures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The BOA supports a multidisciplinary approach to the management of this group of vulnerable patients with a fracture of the femoral neck. We have advocated for and been actively involved in the development of a prompt MDT approach to the assessment and management of these patients, the development of dedicated trauma lists for patients with hip fractures, written standards for the management of such fractures and the instigation of a National Hip Fracture Database that monitors the process for and outcome of these patients. We feel that the care of this group of patients has improved significantly over recent years. Outcomes are discussed regularly at our annual national meeting as well as amongst our Specialist Societies (such as the Orthopaedic Trauma Society – OTS). Relevant updates are cascaded to our membership via regular emails to the members of our association.”

Source location

2017-0373-Response-by-British-Orthopaedic-Association
Page 1 · response
Published 11 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop dedicated trauma lists for patients with hip fractures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The BOA supports a multidisciplinary approach to the management of this group of vulnerable patients with a fracture of the femoral neck. We have advocated for and been actively involved in the development of a prompt MDT approach to the assessment and management of these patients, the development of dedicated trauma lists for patients with hip fractures, written standards for the management of such fractures and the instigation of a National Hip Fracture Database that monitors the process for and outcome of these patients. We feel that the care of this group of patients has improved significantly over recent years. Outcomes are discussed regularly at our annual national meeting as well as amongst our Specialist Societies (such as the Orthopaedic Trauma Society – OTS). Relevant updates are cascaded to our membership via regular emails to the members of our association.”

Source location

2017-0373-Response-by-British-Orthopaedic-Association
Page 1 · response
Published 11 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Cascade relevant hip-fracture care updates to BOA members through regular emails.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The BOA supports a multidisciplinary approach to the management of this group of vulnerable patients with a fracture of the femoral neck. We have advocated for and been actively involved in the development of a prompt MDT approach to the assessment and management of these patients, the development of dedicated trauma lists for patients with hip fractures, written standards for the management of such fractures and the instigation of a National Hip Fracture Database that monitors the process for and outcome of these patients. We feel that the care of this group of patients has improved significantly over recent years. Outcomes are discussed regularly at our annual national meeting as well as amongst our Specialist Societies (such as the Orthopaedic Trauma Society – OTS). Relevant updates are cascaded to our membership via regular emails to the members of our association.”

Source location

2017-0373-Response-by-British-Orthopaedic-Association
Page 1 · response
Published 11 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss hip-fracture care outcomes at annual national meetings and within relevant specialist societies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The BOA supports a multidisciplinary approach to the management of this group of vulnerable patients with a fracture of the femoral neck. We have advocated for and been actively involved in the development of a prompt MDT approach to the assessment and management of these patients, the development of dedicated trauma lists for patients with hip fractures, written standards for the management of such fractures and the instigation of a National Hip Fracture Database that monitors the process for and outcome of these patients. We feel that the care of this group of patients has improved significantly over recent years. Outcomes are discussed regularly at our annual national meeting as well as amongst our Specialist Societies (such as the Orthopaedic Trauma Society – OTS). Relevant updates are cascaded to our membership via regular emails to the members of our association.”

Source location

2017-0373-Response-by-British-Orthopaedic-Association
Page 1 · response
Published 11 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop written standards for managing hip fractures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The BOA supports a multidisciplinary approach to the management of this group of vulnerable patients with a fracture of the femoral neck. We have advocated for and been actively involved in the development of a prompt MDT approach to the assessment and management of these patients, the development of dedicated trauma lists for patients with hip fractures, written standards for the management of such fractures and the instigation of a National Hip Fracture Database that monitors the process for and outcome of these patients. We feel that the care of this group of patients has improved significantly over recent years. Outcomes are discussed regularly at our annual national meeting as well as amongst our Specialist Societies (such as the Orthopaedic Trauma Society – OTS). Relevant updates are cascaded to our membership via regular emails to the members of our association.”

Source location

2017-0373-Response-by-British-Orthopaedic-Association
Page 1 · response
Published 11 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish the National Hip Fracture Database to monitor care processes and patient outcomes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The BOA supports a multidisciplinary approach to the management of this group of vulnerable patients with a fracture of the femoral neck. We have advocated for and been actively involved in the development of a prompt MDT approach to the assessment and management of these patients, the development of dedicated trauma lists for patients with hip fractures, written standards for the management of such fractures and the instigation of a National Hip Fracture Database that monitors the process for and outcome of these patients. We feel that the care of this group of patients has improved significantly over recent years. Outcomes are discussed regularly at our annual national meeting as well as amongst our Specialist Societies (such as the Orthopaedic Trauma Society – OTS). Relevant updates are cascaded to our membership via regular emails to the members of our association.”

Source location

2017-0373-Response-by-British-Orthopaedic-Association
Page 1 · response
Published 11 February 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026