PFD report

Eva Eileen WHEELER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 Dec 2021•South Wales Central

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of a clear and robust process for documenting, requesting and chasing-up emergency ambulances
  2. Lack of protocol-based provision for joint discussion between on-call medical and surgical registrars
  3. Lack of a protocol to inform relevant staff when an emergency ambulance is awaited so that appropriate patients are kept nil by mouth
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of patients' nutritional requirements
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Revise the process for managing patients awaiting emergency ambulances, specifying nil-by-mouth instructions, documentation, and notification responsibilities.

    Stated by Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 December 2021.
  2. Action

    Discuss and explore whether joint registrar discussions should be incorporated into the process for acutely unwell patients.

    Stated by Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 December 2021.
  3. Action

    Deliver re-education for registered nursing and medical staff on the revised acutely unwell patient transfer process.

    Stated by Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 22 December 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The established process between on-call teams is considered sufficient, so no shared discussion protocol is required.

    Stated by Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health BoardExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a clear and robust process for documenting, requesting and chasing-up emergency ambulances

Wider context from the report

“(1) The communication error between staff led to a failure to contact an emergency ambulance to transfer a critically ill patient to a major hospital. Since this incident, computerisation has largely replaced written notes in this Trust, and evidence from staff did not satisfy me that any changes were embedded on the ground. I am concerned that there is not a clear and robust process in place for documenting, requesting and chasing-up emergency ambulances throughout YCC; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of protocol-based provision for joint discussion between on-call medical and surgical registrars

Wider context from the report

“(3) The on-call Medical Registrar at Prince Charles Hospital was contacted for advice, since doctors do not work at YCC overnight. Had the on-call Surgical Registrar been consulted, there may have been an earlier diagnosis of suspected sigmoid volvulus. Bowel obstructions are relatively common in an elderly patient cohort, so I question whether provision for joint discussion between the registrars should be built into a protocol. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a protocol to inform relevant staff when an emergency ambulance is awaited so that appropriate patients are kept nil by mouth

Wider context from the report

“(2) A consequence of the communication error (above) was that Mrs Wheeler was given lunch, rather than being kept nil by mouth prior to proposed surgical assessment. There should be a protocol to inform relevant staff when an emergency ambulance is awaited, so that where appropriate, the patient is kept nil by mouth; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable communication of patients' nutritional requirements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise the process for managing patients awaiting emergency ambulances, specifying nil-by-mouth instructions, documentation, and notification responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A consequence of the communication error (above) was that Mrs Wheeler was given lunch, rather than being kept nil by mouth prior to proposed surgical assessment. There should be a protocol to inform relevant staff when an emergency ambulance is awaited, so that where appropriate, the patient is kept nil by mouth.”

Source location

2021-0424-Response-from-Cwm-Taf-Morgannwg-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss and explore whether joint registrar discussions should be incorporated into the process for acutely unwell patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The on-call Medical Registrar at Prince Charles Hospital was contacted for advice, since doctors do not work at YCC overnight. Had the on-call Surgical Registrar been consulted, there may have been an earlier diagnosis of suspected sigmoid volvulus. Bowel obstructions are relatively common in an elderly patient cohort, so I question whether provision for joint discussion between the registrars should be built into a protocol.”

Source location

2021-0424-Response-from-Cwm-Taf-Morgannwg-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver re-education for registered nursing and medical staff on the revised acutely unwell patient transfer process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, a programme of re-education is in the process of being taken forward to ensure that all Registered Nursing staff and Medical staff are fully conversant with the revised process. Paper copies of the revised process will also be laminated and displayed by the nurses station for ease of reference at all times.”

Source location

2021-0424-Response-from-Cwm-Taf-Morgannwg-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit staff knowledge and understanding of the revised transfer process after completing re-education.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Furthermore, staff knowledge and understanding of the process will be monitored by undertaking an audit following completion of the re-education process. This will be undertaken by the Senior Nurse with responsibility for the wards within Ysbyty Cwm Cynon.”

Source location

2021-0424-Response-from-Cwm-Taf-Morgannwg-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Laminate and display copies of the revised transfer process at nurses’ stations for continuous reference.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, a programme of re-education is in the process of being taken forward to ensure that all Registered Nursing staff and Medical staff are fully conversant with the revised process. Paper copies of the revised process will also be laminated and displayed by the nurses station for ease of reference at all times.”

Source location

2021-0424-Response-from-Cwm-Taf-Morgannwg-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise the process for transferring acutely unwell patients, clarifying staff responsibilities, process stages, and documentation of verbal instructions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“With regards to the first matter, the existing process for the “Transfer of an Acutely Unwell Patient” has been reviewed and revised with a view to:-”

Source location

2021-0424-Response-from-Cwm-Taf-Morgannwg-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The established process between on-call teams is considered sufficient, so no shared discussion protocol is required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Having reviewed the process which currently exists between the on call teams, there have been no reported incidents in relation this well-established process and it is therefore concluded that there is no requirement for an “on call shared discussion protocol” to be developed.”

Source location

2021-0424-Response-from-Cwm-Taf-Morgannwg-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Conduct monthly NEWS documentation audits, report results, act on findings, and provide one-to-one practice development sessions to strengthen clinical competencies.

    Stated by Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 December 2021.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    The on-call team is responsible for deciding whether discussion or referral to another specialty is required.

    Stated by Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health BoardRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct monthly NEWS documentation audits, report results, act on findings, and provide one-to-one practice development sessions to strengthen clinical competencies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, there is an ongoing monthly NEWS audit in place to ensure compliance with the NEWS documentation, the results of which are reported and acted upon by the site based Advanced Nurse Practitioner in partnership with the Senior Nurse and Ward Managers. This includes the provision of one to one practice development sessions to aid learning and strengthen clinical competencies.”

Source location

2021-0424-Response-from-Cwm-Taf-Morgannwg-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The on-call team is responsible for deciding whether discussion or referral to another specialty is required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During out of hours, this process continues and where it is identified that a patient is deteriorating, the escalation process is initiated. Again this process is embedded across all four wards with all Registered Nurses being fully conversant with the action they are required to undertake, namely refer to the on call medical teams for further advice. In this case, the Registered Nurse with responsibility for the patient followed due process by referring to the medical team on call. The decision as to whether discussion or referral to another specialty is required is a clinical decision made by the on call team taking the call.”

Source location

2021-0424-Response-from-Cwm-Taf-Morgannwg-University-Health-Board_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026