PFD report

Mrs Tripta Bhanote · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Sep 2021•Black Country

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Poor procedures for identifying residents' DNAR status
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable DNACPR decision-making, recording and communication
  2. Lack of clarity among care staff about the role and referral circumstances of the enhanced care and quality team
  3. Lack of clarity among care staff about escalation requirements for acutely unwell patients or residents
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate staff competence to recognise and respond to acutely unwell patientsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable escalation policy for care concerns
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Poor procedures for identifying residents' DNAR status

Wider context from the report

“3. There was evidence of poor procedures in place in identifying the DNAR status of residents. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable DNACPR decision-making, recording and communication.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clarity among care staff about the role and referral circumstances of the enhanced care and quality team

Wider context from the report

“2. There was lack of clarity and understanding by care staff of the role of the enhanced care and quality team and circumstances for referral to them. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clarity among care staff about escalation requirements for acutely unwell patients or residents

Wider context from the report

“1. Evidence emerged during the inquest that there was a lack of clarity and understanding by care staff in the requirements for escalation to emergency services when a patient/resident becomes acutely unwell. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate staff competence to recognise and respond to acutely unwell patients; Unreliable escalation policy for care concerns.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.