PFD report

Mrs Ibiyemi Ereohah · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Mar 2020•East London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to ensure timely consultant reviews
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in consultant review of patients
  2. Insufficient gynae-oncology consultant cover
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient medical staffing capacity for timely patient carePart of recurring concern: Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure timely consultant reviews

Wider context from the report

“2. Mrs Ereohah was deemed unfit for surgery by a clinical nurse specialist on the 16th February 2018. The nurse requested a consultant review which should have taken place within 3-5 weeks. It did not take place until 16 weeks later. The Inquest heard evidence that there was no system in place to ensure that all consultant reviews were carried out within a timely manner. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in consultant review of patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient gynae-oncology consultant cover

Wider context from the report

“1. Many of the concerns arising in this case were considered to be due to an insufficiency of gynae-oncology consultant cover at Newham University hospital. The lack of adequate Consultant cover was deemed to have contributed to the lack of advocacy at the MDT meeting; the inability to challenge the MDT conclusion and the lack of Consultant overview of the recurrent admissions. In July 2019, the Trust agreed two key actions to address this deficiency: • Clinical Leads at the RLH and NUH to review gynaecological oncology staffing and job planning, to ensure adequate administration time; cover when on leave/programmed for other duties, such as hot weeks. • There should be an urgent organisational development/service level review of the NUH gynae-oncology team that is independent of the site. As at the date of the Inquest, neither of these necessary actions had been completed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient medical staffing capacity for timely patient care; Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.